Skip to main content

“Scum of the Earth”: Animus and Violence Against Sex Offenders in Canadian Penitentiaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sexual Crime and the Experience of Imprisonment

Part of the book series: Sexual Crime ((SEXCR))

Abstract

Correctional scholars have long explored how those who are imprisoned for sexual offences (SOs) are targeted because of the nature of their crimes. In consequence, SOs report experiencing excessive physical, psychological, and emotional violence in prison. On the surface, their experiences resonate with how some scholars conceptualize the patterns of victimization faced by hate crime victims. This area of inquiry, however, remains underexplored. In response, the authors draw from the voices of 56 former federally incarcerated Canadian men, shedding light on their interpretations of other prisoners, either thought to be or actually convicted of a sex offence as well as any parallels in the positioning of SOs in prison and victims of bias-motivated crimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Once transferred to federal custody, all men begin by serving time in reception (e.g., a range or prison classified as maximum security) and are later assessed and transferred to their “home” institution of the security classification deemed appropriate (Correctional Service Canada, 2012).

  2. 2.

    Given our sampling procedure, we are unable to verify exactly how many parolees declined participation.

  3. 3.

    An honorarium was provided to compensate participants for their time—which was refused by one participant.

  4. 4.

    Any direct verbal quotes from interviewees have been edited for speech fillers (i.e., “like,” “umm,” and “ahh”) and grammar to assist with clarity and flow.

  5. 5.

    For example, after being sentenced to 15 consecutive life sentences for the murder, rape, and the dismembering of 15 of his 17 victims between 1978 and 1991, Jeffrey Dahmer was brutally stabbed to death by a fellow prisoner.

References

  • Åkerström, M. (1986). Outcasts in prison: The cases of informers and sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 7(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axford, M. (2011). Homicide, sex, robbery and drug offenders in federal corrections: An end-of-2008 review. Correctional Service of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. (2001). Policing hatred. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagden, N., & Pemberton, S. (2010). The challenge in conducting qualitative research with convicted sex offenders. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 49(3), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti, N., & Garland, J. (2012). Reconceptualizing hate crime victimization and through the lens of vulnerability and ‘difference’. Theoretical Criminology, 16(4), 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmer, D. (1958). The prison community. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compendium, C. (2008). Sex offenders in the correctional system: Survey summary. Lincoln, NE: CEGA Services Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correctional Service Canada. (2012). Correctional service Canada 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/index-eng.shtml

  • Cowburn, M. (1996). The black male sex offenders in prison: Images and issues. The Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2(2), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig-Henderson, K. (2009). The psychological harms of hate: Implications and interventions. In B. Perry & P. Iganski (Eds.), Hate crimes: The consequences of hate crime (pp. 15–30). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelber, K. (2000). Hate crimes: Public policy implications of the inclusion of gender. Australian Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groth, A. N. (1983). Treatment of sex offenders in a correctional institution. In J. G. Greer & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Berrill, K. T. (Eds.). (1992). Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C., & Ireland, C. A. (2009). Attitudes towards male and female sex offenders: A comparison of forensic staff, prison officers and the general public in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 11(1), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, T. E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders. In N. K. Clark & G. M. Stephenson (Eds.), Sexual offenders: Context, assessment and treatment (pp. 27–32). Leicester: BPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iganski, P. (2001). Hate crimes hurt more. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(4), 626–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iganski, P., & Lagou, S. (2009). How hate crimes hurt more: Evidence from the British Crime Survey. In B. Perry & P. Iganski (Eds.), Hate crimes: The consequences of hate crime (pp. 1–14). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, V., & Broad, K. (1997). Hate crimes: New social movements and the politics of violence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, F. M. (1999). Punishing hate: Bias crimes under American law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. (2002). The violence of hate: Confronting racism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of bigotry. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. A. (2009). Beyond the immediate victim: Understanding hate crimes as message crimes. In B. Perry & P. Iganski (Eds.), Hate crimes: The consequences of hate crime (pp. 107–122). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, G. (2010). Prejudice and paedophilia in hate crime laws: Dunn v R. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1601685

  • Mason, G. (2014). Victim attributes in hate crime law: Difference and the politics of justice. British Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, B. (2003). Gender-bias hate crimes: A review. In B. Perry (Ed.), Hate and bias crime: A reader (pp. 261–280). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia. (2017). Surrey creep catcher. Retrieved from https://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/2060

  • Perry, B. (2001). In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. (2008). Silent victims: Hate crime against native Americans. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrunik, M. G. (2002). Managing unacceptable risk: Sex offenders, community response, and social policy in the United States and Canada. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(4), 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardelli, R. (2014). The inmate code: Looking at men in Canadian penitentiaries. Journal of Crime and Justice, 37(2), 234–255. Retrieved December 3, 2012, from https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.746012

  • Ricciardelli, R., & Moir, M. (2013). Stigmatized among the stigmatized: Sex offenders in Canadian penitentiaries. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(3), 353–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardelli, R., & Spencer, D. (2014). Exposing ‘sex’ offenders: Precarity, abjection and violence in the Canadian federal prison system. British Journal of Criminology, 54(3), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardelli, R., & Spencer, D. (2017). Violence, sex offenders, and corrections. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbers, M. L. P. (2009). Lifers on the outside. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X07312953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaebe, C. (2005). Learning to pass: Sex offenders’ strategies for establishing a viable identity in the prison general population. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(6), 614–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D., & Ricciardelli, R. (2016). They’re a very sick group of individuals’: Correctional officers, emotions, and sex offenders. Theoretical Criminology, 21(3), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480616647590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, M. S., & Sapp, A. D. (1989). Less than utopian: Sex offender treatment in a milieu of power struggles, status positioning, and inmate manipulation in state correctional institutions. The Prison Journal, 69(2), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldram, J. B. (2007). Everybody has a story: Listening to imprisoned sexual offenders. Qualitative Health Research, 17(7), 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307306014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (1997, November). The transforming power of hate: Social cognition theory and the harms of hate-related crime. Southern California Law Review, 71, 47–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J. (1992). First amendment challenges to hate crime legislation: Where’s the speech? Criminal Justice Ethics, 11(2), 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, D. J. (1983). Sex offenders and offending. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 182–233). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnick, T. A., & Bodkin, M. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled ‘ex-con’. Deviant Behavior, 29(4), 295–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701588081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, N., Blitz, C. L., Shi, J., Siegel, J. A., & Bachman, R. (2007). Physical violence inside prisons: Rates of victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(5), 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scrivens, R., Ricciardelli, R. (2019). “Scum of the Earth”: Animus and Violence Against Sex Offenders in Canadian Penitentiaries. In: Blagden, N., Winder, B., Hocken, K., Lievesley, R., Banyard, P., Elliott, H. (eds) Sexual Crime and the Experience of Imprisonment. Sexual Crime. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04930-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics