Skip to main content

Digital Beamforming and Adaptive Processing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Modern ESAs present the opportunity to do digital processing on the outputs of multiple subarrays without having to digitally sample the output of each element, thereby greatly simplifying the design of the ESA while still achieving the benefits of adaptive processing. The principles behind two common techniques, minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) and space-time adaptive processing (STAP), are described, and it is shown that under idealized conditions MVDR and STAP perform identically. An example of jammer nulling is discussed in detail when the interfering signal(s) is within the main beam of the ESA but outside of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) beamwidth. It is shown also that MVDR works better in this case when the jammers are distributed symmetrically about the desired signal, something that can be achieved in MVDR by simply modifying the subarray to subarray covariance matrix of the interference used to compute subarray weights.

This Section was originally presented as a paper (Dana 2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Another way to see that this must be true is by considering the derivation of the link margin equation. The received signal power is the product of the power per unit area times the effective area of the aperture. For equal area subarrays, their effective area must be 1/N SA times that of the full array assuming lossless combining.

  2. 2.

    The weights are based on linearly constrained, minimum variance (LCMV) optimization as described in Van Trees (2002, Chap. 6).

  3. 3.

    The weights are computed by setting Λ =  − 1 in Eq. (6.2) and then using Eq. (6.3) to renormalize.

References

  • Dana, R. A. (2018, September) Digital beamforming vs adaptive processing in modern electronically scanned arrays (ESAs). In: Proceedings of Antenna Applications Symposium

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailloux, R. J. (2005). Phased Array antenna handbook (2nd ed.). Boston: Artech House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, K. B., & Pedersen, M. S. (2008, November). The matrix cookbook (matrixcookbook.com).

  • Richards, M. A. (2014). Fundamentals of radar signal processing. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Trees, H. L. (2002). Optimum array processing. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dana, R.A. (2019). Digital Beamforming and Adaptive Processing. In: Electronically Scanned Arrays (ESAs) and K-Space Gain Formulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04678-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04678-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04677-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04678-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics