Skip to main content

Forgetting Punished Recommendations for MOOC

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Data and Social Networks (CSoNet 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11280))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Prerequisite inadequacy tends to cause more drop-out of MOOC. Recommendation is an effective method of learning intervene. Existing recommendation for MOOC is mainly for subsequent learning objects that have not been learned before. This paper proposes a solution called Forgetting-punished MOOC Recommendation (FMR). FMR combines the forgetting effect on learning score as a main feature for recommendation. It provides Prerequisite Recommendation (PR) for the unqualified learning objects and Subsequent Recommendation (SR) for the qualified objects. Experiments verify the accuracy improvement of PR and SR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://jclass.pte.sh.cn.

References

  1. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., De Boer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., Seaton, D.T.: Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: research into edX’s first MOOC. Res. Pract. Assess. 8, 13–25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., Schneider, E.: Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 170–179. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pappano, L.: The year of the MOOC. New York Times, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Polyzou, A., Karypis, G.: Grade prediction with course and student specific models. In: Bailey, J., Khan, L., Washio, T., Dobbie, G., Huang, J.Z., Wang, R. (eds.) PAKDD 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9651, pp. 89–101. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31753-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, Y., Liu, H., Carbonell, J., Ma, W.: Concept graph learning from educational data. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 159–168. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, J., Jiang, L., Wu, Z., Zheng, Q., Qian, Y.: Mining learning dependency between knowledge units from text. VLDB J. Int. J. Very Large Data Bases 20(3), 335–345 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, X., Yang, K., Lawrence, V.B.: An efficient data mining approach to concept map generation for adaptive learning. In: Perner, P. (ed.) ICDM 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9165, pp. 247–260. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20910-4_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Scheines, R., Silver, E., Goldin, I.M.: Discovering prerequisite relationships among knowledge components. In: EDM, pp. 355–356 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vuong, A., Nixon, T., Towle, B.: A method for finding prerequisites within a curriculum. In: EDM, pp. 211–216 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liang, C., Wu, Z., Huang, W., Giles, C.L.: Measuring prerequisite relations among concepts. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1668–1674 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Talukdar, P.P., Cohen, W.W.: Crowd sourced comprehension: predicting prerequisite structure in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, pp. 307–315. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, S., et al.: Using prerequisites to extract concept maps from textbooks. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 317–326. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agrawal, R., Golshan, B., Terzi, E.: Grouping students in educational settings. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1017–1026. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, Z., Pan, S.J., Li, Y., Jiang, J., Yang, Q.: Collaborative evolution for user profiling in recommender systems. In: IJCAI, pp. 3804–3810 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, Y., Han, J., Yan, X., Yu, P.S., Wu, T.: Pathsim: meta path-based top-k similarity search in heterogeneous information networks. Proc. VLDB Endow. 4(11), 992–1003 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Gan, J., Ren, J., Hu, Y.: Content-based top-N recommendation using heterogeneous relations. In: Cheema, M.A., Zhang, W., Chang, L. (eds.) ADC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9877, pp. 308–320. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46922-5_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, H., O’Riedl, M.: A sequential recommendation approach for interactive personalized story generation. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 71–78. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, Y.-M., Huang, T.-C., Wang, K.-T., Hwang, W.-Y.: A Markov-based recommendation model for exploring the transfer of learning on the web. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(2), 144 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mi, F., Faltings, B.: Adaptive sequential recommendation using context trees. In: IJCAI, pp. 4018–4019 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, Y., Cho, J.: An intelligent course recommendation system. SmartCR 1(1), 69–84 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Education Growth Advisors: Learning to adapt: understanding the adaptive learning supplier landscape. PLN/Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ebbinghaus, H.: Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. Ann. Neurosci. 20(4), 155 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schacter, D.L.: The seven sins of memory: insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Am. Psychol. 54(3), 182 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Averell, L., Heathcote, A.: The form of the forgetting curve and the fate of memories. J. Math. Psychol. 55(1), 25–35 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Breese, J.S., Heckerman, D., Kadie, C.: Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 43–52. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clark, D.: Adaptive MOOCs. CogBooks adaptive learning. Copyright CogBooks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work is funded by computer science and technology subject of Shanghai Polytechnic University with No. xxkzd1604.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanxia Pang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pang, Y., Li, L., Tan, W., Jin, Y., Zhang, Y. (2018). Forgetting Punished Recommendations for MOOC. In: Chen, X., Sen, A., Li, W., Thai, M. (eds) Computational Data and Social Networks. CSoNet 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11280. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04648-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04648-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04647-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04648-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics