Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

  • 3058 Accesses

Abstract

Because a large time spread in most crack initiation tests makes it a daunting task to predict the initiation time of cracking, a probabilistic model, such as the Weibull distribution, has been usually employed to model it. In this case, although it might be anticipated to develop a more reliable cracking model under ideal cracking test conditions (e.g., large number of specimen, narrow censoring interval, etc.), it is not straightforward to quantitatively assess the effects of these experimental conditions on model estimation uncertainty . Therefore, we studied the effects of some key experimental conditions on estimation uncertainties of the Weibull parameters through the Monte Carlo simulations. Simulation results suggested that the estimated scale parameter would be more reliable than the estimated shape parameter from the tests. It was also shown that increasing the number of specimen would be more efficient to reduce the uncertainty of estimators than the more frequent censoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

CDF:

Cumulative distribution function

\( F\left( \cdot \right) \) :

Cumulative distribution function of Weibull distribution

ECF:

End cracking fraction

\( \hat{\eta } \) :

Estimator of Weibull scale parameter

\( \hat{\beta } \) :

Estimator of Weibull shape parameter

EVD:

Extreme value distribution

EVDm :

Extreme value distribution for minima

GEVD:

Generalized extreme value distribution

iid:

Independent and identically distributed

\( s_{i} \) :

Last censoring time of i th suspended specimen

LCI:

Length of censoring interval

\( L\left( \cdot \right) \) :

Likelihood function

\( \mu \) :

Location parameter of generalized extreme value distribution

\( l\left( \cdot \right) \) :

Log-likelihood function

LB:

Lower bound

\( c_{{j_{L} }} \) :

Lower bound time of censoring interval for j th cracking

MLE:

Maximum likelihood estimation

C:

Number of interval-censored cracked specimens

S:

Number of suspended specimens

PDF:

Probability density function

\( g\left( \cdot \right) \) :

Probability density function of generalized extreme value distribution

\( {\text{RE}}\left( \cdot \right) \) :

Relative error

\( {\text{RE}}_{50\% } \) :

Relative error of median estimates

\( {\text{RLCI}}_{90\% } \) :

Relative length of 90% confidence interval

RTD:

Relative test duration

\( \sigma \) :

Scale parameter of generalized extreme value distribution

\( \eta \) :

Scale parameter of Weibull distribution

\( \xi \) :

Shape parameter of generalized extreme value distribution

\( \beta \) :

Shape parameter of Weibull distribution

SCC:

Stress corrosion cracking

t :

Time

\( \eta_{\text{true}} \) :

True Weibull scale parameter

\( \beta_{\text{true}} \) :

True Weibull shape parameter

UB:

Upper bound

\( c_{{j_{U} }} \) :

Upper bound time of censoring interval for jth cracking

\( x \) :

Variable of generalized extreme value distribution

References

  1. W. Lunceford, T. DeWees, P. Scott, EPRI Materials Degradation Matrix, Rev. 3. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, USA 3002000628, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Scott, M.-C. Meunier, Materials Reliability Program: Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Alloys 182 and 82 in PWR Primary Water Service (MRP-220). EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, USA Rep. No. 1015427, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  3. K.J. Kim and E.S. Do, Technical Report: Inspection of Bottom Mounted Instrumentation Nozzle (in Korean). Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS), Daejeon, Korea KINS/RR-1360, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Amzallag, S.L. Hong, C. Pages, A. Gelpi, Stress Corrosion Life Assessment of Alloy 600 PWR Components. in 9th International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, 1999, pp. 243–250

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y.S. Garud, Stress Corrosion Cracking Initiation Model for Stainless Steel and Nickel Alloys. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, USA 1019032, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Erickson, F. Ammirato, B. Brust, D. Dedhia, E. Focht, M. Kirk, et al., Models and Inputs Selected for Use in the xLPR Pilot Study. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, USA 1022528, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Troyer, S. Fyfitch, K. Schmitt, G. White, C. Harrington, Dissimilar Metal Weld PWSCC Initiation Model Refinement for XLPR Part I: A Survey of Alloy 82/182/132 Crack Initiation Literature. in 17th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, August 9–13, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Weibull, A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech. 18, 293–297 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Eason, Materials Reliability Program: Effects of Hydrogen, pH, Lithium and Boron on Primary Water Stress Corrosion Crack Initiation in Alloy 600 for Temperatures in the Range 320–330°C (MRP-147). EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, USA 1012145, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  10. I.S. Hwang, S.U. Kwon, J.H. Kim, S.G. Lee, An intraspecimen method for the statistical characterization of stress corrosion crack initiation behavior. Corrosion 57, 787–793 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. McCool, Using the Weibull distribution: reliability, modeling, and inference (Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., USA, 2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. S.M. Ross, Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 4th edn. (Elsevier Academic Press, USA, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.A. Fisher L.H.C. Tippett, Limiting Forms of the Frequency Distribution of the Largest or Smallest Member of a Sample. in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1928, pp. 180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.L. Wolpert, Extremes, Available online: https://www2.stat.duke.edu/courses/Fall15/sta711/lec/topics/extremes.pdf, 2014

  15. J.P. Park, C. Park, J. Cho, C.B. Bahn, Effects of cracking test conditions on estimation uncertainty for Weibull parameters considering time-dependent censoring interval. Materials 10, 3 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. D. McFadden,Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. Transportation Research Record 1978

    Google Scholar 

  17. U. Genschel, W.Q. Meeker, A comparison of maximum likelihood and median-rank regression for Weibull estimation. Q. Eng. 22, 236–255 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J.P. Park, C.B. Bahn, Uncertainty evaluation of Weibull estimators through Monte Carlo simulation: applications for crack initiation testing. Materials 9, 521 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F.R. Hampel, E.M. Ronchetti, P.J. Rousseeuw, W.A. Stahel, Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions vol 114, Wiley, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.D. Hong, C. Jang, T.S. Kim, PFM application for the PWSCC integrity of Ni-Base alloy welds—development and application of PINEP-PWSCC. Nuclear Eng. Technol. 44, 961–970 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Dozaki, D. Akutagawa, N. Nagata, H. Takihuchi, K. Norring, Effects of dissolved hydrogen condtent in PWR primary water on PWSCC initiation property. E-J. Adv. Main. 2, 65–76 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y.S. Garud, SCC initiation model and its implementation for probabilistic assessment. in ASME Pressure Vessels & Piping Division, July 18–22, 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KOFONS) granted financial resource from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea (No. 1403006), and was supported by “Human Resources Program in Energy Technology” of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), who granted the financial resources from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Korea. (No. 20164010201000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Cite this paper

Park, J.P., Park, C., Bahn, C.B. (2019). A Statistical Analysis on Modeling Uncertainty Through Crack Initiation Tests. In: Jackson, J., Paraventi, D., Wright, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems – Water Reactors. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04639-2_135

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics