Abstract
In this chapter, we provide a reflective and analytical description of the interdisciplinary design activities of E-Rebuild, identify driving design questions and salient design patterns that capture and frame the essence of E-Rebuild development, and discuss distilled meta-generalizations that help to decompose the interdisciplinary learning game design processes to inform future work related to design, research, and deployment. The description of salient patterns of interdisciplinary game design in this chapter provides a contextualized design narrative/account of core design processes along with an analytical synthesis of core design pattern elements—a design problem statement with its context and specifics, the solution or technique to solving the stated problem, and the pattern of transferring or scaling this design solution or design move.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burns, J. M. (1998). Transactional and transforming leadership. In G. R. Hickman (Ed.), Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (pp. 133–134). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Csikszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441.
Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206.
Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 64(2), 219–244.
Ke, F., Shute, V., Clark, K., Erlebacher, G., Smith, D., Fazian, P., Lee, S., & Xu, X. (2017, April). Math learning through game-based architectural design and building. Paper presented at 2017 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX.
Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24.
Kim, Y. J., Almond, R. G., & Shute, V. J. (2016). Applying evidence-centered design for the development of game-based assessments in physics playground. International Journal of Testing, 16(2), 142–163.
Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., & Lukas, J. F. (2003). A brief introduction to evidence-centered design. ETS Research Report Series, 2003(1). Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-03-16.pdf
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pratt, D. D., Winters, N., Cerulli, M., & Leemkuil, H. (2009). A patterns approach to connecting the design and deployment of mathematical games and simulations. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 215–232). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Reigeluth, C. (1992). Elaborating the elaboration theory. Educational Technology Research & Development, 40(3), 80–86.
Winters, N., & Mor, Y. (2008). IDR: A participatory methodology for interdisciplinary design in technology enhanced learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 579–600.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ke, F., Shute, V., Clark, K.M., Erlebacher, G. (2019). Interdisciplinary Design Activities and Patterns. In: Interdisciplinary Design of Game-based Learning Platforms. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04339-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04339-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04338-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04339-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)