Abstract
Games are not just a vehicle to enhance learning but a new way of understanding and organizing learning. The starting point of an optimal integration of learning and play in the game setting is to identify the salient elements of learning itself and the inherent learning processes in gameplay. In this introductory chapter, we discuss relevant theoretical perspectives on the nature of knowledge and learning that guide the exploration of playful elements in learning and consequently the opportunities for learning that games offer. We then provide a conceptual review of prior research of game design and discuss the challenges and the interdisciplinary nature of educational game development. In the end, we introduce the overall goal, structure, and chapters of this book.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abt, C. C. (1975). Serious games. New York: Viking Compass.
Adams, E. (2014). Fundamentals of game design. New York: Pearson Education.
Adams, E., & Dormans, J. (2012). Game mechanics: Advanced game design. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
Amory, A. (2007). Game object model version II: A theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 51–77.
Andersen, E., Liu, Y. E., Snider, R., Szeto, R., Cooper, S., & Popović, Z. (2011, June). On the harmfulness of secondary game objectives. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 30–37). New York: ACM.
Annetta, L. A. (2010). The “I's” have it: A framework for serious educational game design. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 105–112.
Becker, K. (2008). The invention of good games: Understanding learning design in commercial video games (Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary).
Björk, S., & Holopainen, J. (2005). Patterns in game design. Boston, MA: Charles River Media.
Breuer, J., & Bente, G. (2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1), 7–24.
Butler, E., Andersen, E., Smith, A. M., Gulwani, S., & Popović, Z. (2015, April). Automatic game progression design through analysis of solution features. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2407–2416). New York: ACM.
Calvillo-Gámez, E. H., Cairns, P., & Cox, A. L. (2015). Assessing the core elements of the gaming experience. In Game user experience evaluation (pp. 37–62). New York: Springer, Cham.
Charsky, D. (2010). From edutainment to serious games: A change in the use of game characteristics. Games and culture, 5(2), 177–198.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249–264.
Denis, G., & Jouvelot, P. (2005, June). Motivation-driven educational game design: Applying best practices to music education. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (pp. 462–465). New York: ACM.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). New York: ACM.
Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31, 121–127.
Dewey, J. (1929). The quest of certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 253–273.
Eriksson, I., & Lindberg, V. (2016). Enriching ‘learning activity’ with ‘epistemic practices’–enhancing students’ epistemic agency and authority. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(1), 32432.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20–20.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., et al. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21.
Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004, July). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on challenges in game AI (Vol. 4(1), p. 1722–1726).
Jenkins, H. (2004). Game design as narrative architecture. In P. Harrington & N. Frup-Waldrop (Eds.), First person (pp. 44–53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kafai, Y. B. (2012). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. New York: Routledge.
Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 64(2), 219–244.
Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24.
Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). Engagement and fun. In Gamification in Learning and Education (pp. 7–14). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward. Cambridge, MA: The Education Arcade.
Koster, R. (2013). Theory of fun for game design. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction volume 3: Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mitgutsch, K. (2009). Passionate digital play-based Learning, (re)Learning in computer games like Shadow of the Colossus. Eludamos, 3(1), 9–22.
Mitgutsch, K., & Alvarado, N. (2012, May). Purposeful by design?: A serious game design assessment framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the foundations of digital games (pp. 121–128). New York: ACM.
O'Rourke, E., Andersen, E., Gulwani, S., & Popović, Z. (2015, April). A framework for automatically generating interactive instructional scaffolding. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1545–1554). New York: ACM.
O'Rourke, E., Haimovitz, K., Ballweber, C., Dweck, C., & Popović, Z. (2014, April). Brain points: A growth mindset incentive structure boosts persistence in an educational game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3339–3348). New York: ACM.
Pinelle, D., Wong, N., & Stach, T. (2008, April). Heuristic evaluation for games: Usability principles for video game design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1453–1462). New York: ACM.
Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(2), 43–58.
Robertson, J., & Howells, C. (2008). Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 559–578.
Rodriguez, H. (2006). The playful and the serious: An approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens. Game Studies, 6(1), 1604–7982.
Salen, K., Tekinbaş, K. S., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Boston: MIT press.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2005). Game design and meaningful play. In J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 59–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sawyer, B. (2003) Serious games: Improving public policy through game-based learning and simulation. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Retrieved from http://wwics.si.edu/foresight/index.htm.
Schell, J. (2014). The art of game design: A book of lenses. New York: AK Peters/CRC Press.
Shute, V. J., & Ke, F. (2012). Games, learning, and assessment. In D. Ifenthaler, D. Eseryel, & X. Ge (Eds.), Assessment in game-based learning: Foundations, innovations, and perspectives (pp. 43–58). New York: Springer.
Suits, B. H. (1978). The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Susi, T., Johannesson, M., & Backlund, P. (2007). Serious games: An overview. Retrieved from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:2416/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Torbeyns, J., Lehtinen, E., & Elen, J. (2015). Describing and studying domain-specific serious games. Switzerland, Cham: Springer.
Van Staalduinen, J. P., & de Freitas, S. (2011). A game-based learning framework: Linking game design and learning. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Learning to play: Exploring the future of education with video games (pp. 29–53). New York: Peter Lang.
Warren, S. J., & Jones, G. (2017). Learning games: The science and art of development. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ke, F., Shute, V., Clark, K.M., Erlebacher, G. (2019). Introduction and Prior Research Review. In: Interdisciplinary Design of Game-based Learning Platforms. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04339-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04339-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04338-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04339-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)