Skip to main content

The Global Education Industry, Data Infrastructures, and the Restructuring of Government School Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Researching the Global Education Industry

Abstract

This chapter focuses on a largely hidden dimension of the privatization and commercialization of public schooling systems, namely the role of edu-businesses in relation to the creation of data infrastructures that are indispensable to the structuring of government schooling systems today. Large, private ed-tech companies are an important element of the Global Education Industry (GEI) and have been important in the creation of interoperability standards and the provision of these structuring data infrastructures. The chapter shows how the move to network governance with the involvement of edu-businesses and philanthropies alongside state actors in all aspects of the policy cycle has facilitated this work of ed-techs as an example of ‘extrastatecraft’. The chapter documents two case studies: one Australian and the other in the USA of the work of ed-techs, in relation to data infrastructures. The Australian case analyses the development of the National Schools Interoperability Program (NSIP), which functions in a networked governance mode through collaboration between governments and ed-tech companies. The second case documents the InBloom data infrastructure initiative across nine US states funded by the Gates Foundation (2011–2014). InBloom sought to provide a single platform for the sharing of data about schooling across these states and was set against President Obama’s Race to the Top legislation that demanded school systems develop ‘data systems to support instruction’. Parental and teacher union opposition around data privacy to InBloom and to NSIP developments in Australia will also be outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Australian Research Council Discovery Project, DP150102098. Chief investigators: Bob Lingard, Kal Gulson, Sam Sellar, and Keita Takayama with Christopher Lubienski and Taylor Webb as Partner Investigators.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted though that state restructuring are not the same thing as the neoliberal agendas. Rather, they are complementary and enabling. Furthermore, Ball, Junemann and Santori (2017, p. 1) are right when they stress the need to talk about neoliberalization as a process rather than as an abstract construction as a noun. This emphasis means we need to attend to the empirical realities of neoliberalism at work in particular contexts.

  3. 3.

    This section and the subsequent one draws heavily on Sellar (2017).

  4. 4.

    On the Gates Foundation, see Tompkins-Stange (2017). She sees this philanthropic organization as an outcomes-oriented one that relies heavily on expertise in a top-down way with a stress on measurable outcomes.

  5. 5.

    The narrative of InBloom here draws closely on that provided by Bulger, McCormick and Pitcan (2017). They also provide a very useful account of the successful opposition to this project.

  6. 6.

    It should be acknowledged that Education International, the international federation of teacher unions, has a coordinated global project about the privatization and commercialization of government schooling. The Australian teacher union that funded the research on which this chapter is based has also used this research strategically.

References

  • A4L. (2015). Introducing the Access 4 Learning Community – The SIF Association Matures to Address Not Only Data Management but Data Usage for Learning. Retrieved from https://www.prlog.org/12457789-introducing-the-access-4-learning-community.html. Accessed on 03/01/2018.

  • Anagnostopoulos, D., Rutledge, S., & Jacobsen, R. (Eds.). (2013). The Infrastructure of Accountability: Data Use and the Transformation of American Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, W., & Ferrare, J. (Eds.). (2015). Mapping Corporate Education Reform: Power and Policy Networks in the Neoliberal State. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neo-liberal Imaginary. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, New Governance and Education. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., Junemann, C., & Santori, D. (2017). Edu.net: Globalisation and Education Policy Mobility. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, M., McCormick, P., & Pitcan, M. (2017). The Legacy of InBloom. Working Paper 02.02.2017: Data & Society. Retrieved from https://datasociety.net/pubs/ecl/InBloom_feb_2017.pdf. Accessed on 03/01/2018.

  • Burch, P. (2009). Hidden Markets: The New Education Privatization. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartong, S. (2018). Towards a Topological Re-assemblage of Education Policy? Observing the Implementation of Performance Data Infrastructures and ‘Centres of Calculation’ in Germany. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(1), 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, A., Thompson, G., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2018). Teachers’ and School Leaders’ Perceptions of Commercialisation in Australian Public Schools. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(2), 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. (2016). The End of Public Schools: The Corporate Reform Agenda to Privatize Public Education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D., McGinnis, S., Chen, Z., & Lingard, B. (2018, in press). Resisting the Neoliberal: Parent Activism in New York State Against the Corporate Reform Agenda in Schooling. In L. Tett, & Hamiton, M. (Eds), Resisting Neoliberalism in Education: Local, National, and Transnational Perspectives, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. (2015). Small Data in the Era of Big Data. GeoJournal, 80(4), 463–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M. (2013). A Systemless System: Designing the Disarticulation of English State Education. European Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2010). Policy Borrowing, Policy Learning: Testing Times in Australian Schools. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). Globalizing educational accountabilities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New Scalar Politics: Implications for Education Policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Sellar, S., Hogan, A., & Thompson, G. (2017). Commercialisation in Public Schooling: Final Report Summary. Sydney: New South Wales Teachers Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2009). Governing Education Through Data in England: From Regulation to Self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2017). Miseducation: Inequality, Education and the Working Classes. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2007). A Sociology of Globalization. New York: W.W.Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, S. (2017). Making Network Markets in Education: The Development of Data Infrastructure in Australian Schooling. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(3), 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2018). Businesses Seeing Like a State, Governments Calculating Like a Business. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(5), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1449980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins-Stange, M. (2017). Policy Patrons: Philanthropy, Education Reform, and the Politics of Influence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The Privatization of Education: A Political Economy of Global Education Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Eds.). (2016). The Global Education Industry. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B. (2017). Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice. London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob Lingard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lingard, B. (2019). The Global Education Industry, Data Infrastructures, and the Restructuring of Government School Systems. In: Parreira do Amaral, M., Steiner-Khamsi, G., Thompson, C. (eds) Researching the Global Education Industry. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04236-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04236-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04235-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04236-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics