Skip to main content

Sectoral Views on Police and Judicial Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brexit and Internal Security

Abstract

This chapter offers short expert views on different aspects of police and judicial cooperation, including De Vries’ contribution on cooperation regarding counterterrorism and the fight against organised crime; Bossong and Rieger’s exploration of future data sharing options for police cooperation; Trauner’s piece on the negotiations regarding the UK’s future participation in Europol; Wilson and Carr’s discussion of future cooperation in Forensic Science; and MacKenzie’s considerations on the UK’s role in EU counter-terrorism policy. This chapter also encompasses a number of expert views that focus specifically on security threats, including Sergi’s analysis of Brexit creating opportunities for transnational criminal networks; Farrand’s exploration of Brexit’s impact on combatting counterfeiting; and Porcedda’s and Lavorgna’s pieces on the consequences of Brexit for the UK and the EU in the area of cybersecurity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This contribution was originally published in the LSE Brexit Blog on the 12th of March 2018. For the original, please visit: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2018/03/12/a-hard-brexit-will-see-criminals-taking-back-control/.

  2. 2.

    The DRD was invalidated by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in 2014.

  3. 3.

    Ian Duncan Smith, for example, warned that remaining in the EU would expose the UK to the possibility of Paris-style attacks (those from 13 November 2015) (BBC 2016).

  4. 4.

    This text was originally published in the BSC Blog on the 1st of March 2018. For the original text, please see https://thebscblog.wordpress.com/2018/03/01/not-in-my-backyard-brexit-and-the-myths-of-transnational-organised-crime/.

  5. 5.

    All views expressed in this piece remain mine and do not reflect in any way the views of the EPSRC. I wish to express my gratitude to Helena Farrand-Carrapico and Martyn Egan for the insightful comments that helped improving this text.

  6. 6.

    The 1990 Computer Misuse Act was passed long before the Budapest Convention. For a comparative legal historical perspective on cybercrime, see https://www.coe.int/sv/web/octopus/countries (accessed 22 June 2018).

  7. 7.

    To which it is bound by means of clear connection clauses (Porcedda and Wall 2018). On connection clauses, see Cremona (2016).

  8. 8.

    Wall (2016) also adds issues of common research under EU funding.

  9. 9.

    In the UK, for instance, the definition of ‘computer misuse’ does not include the notion of data.

  10. 10.

    See http://www.efta.int/eea-lex.

  11. 11.

    For documents concerning Galileo, see http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/space/galileo/documents_en.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Carrapico .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carrapico, H., Niehuss, A., Berthélémy, C. (2019). Sectoral Views on Police and Judicial Cooperation. In: Brexit and Internal Security. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04194-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics