Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Moving Toward Transdisciplinary Instruction: A Longitudinal Examination of STEAM Teaching Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
STEAM Education

Abstract

For years, the STEAM movement has been touted by businesses, universities, and even governments as a way to move beyond focusing on single disciplines such as science but instead toward multiple modes of problem-solving and viewpoints (Connor AM, Karmokar S, Whittington C. International Journal of Engineering Pedagog 5(2):37–47, 2015). However, STEAM education in the K-12 setting is still relatively new, which has led to a limited conceptual understanding of how to conceptualize, design, or enact STEAM education (Kim & Park, The effect of STEAM education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. In Kim T, Stoica A, Fang W, Vasilakos T, Villalba J, Arnett K,… Kang B (eds), Computer applications for security, control and system engineering. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35264-5_16, 2012). This limited understanding often leads teachers to use existing STEM models and attempt to “add-on” experiences with the arts or humanities (Henriksen D, DeSchryver M, Mishra P, Deep-Play Research Group, TechTrends 59:5, 2015). In response, the authors have spent the last 3 years conducting a longitudinal study exploring how STEAM teaching practices are enacted in a variety of settings in the southeast of the United States in order to understand teachers’ implementation strategies (Herro D, Quigley C, Prof Dev Educ, 1–23, 2016a, On the Horizon 24:190–204, 2016b; Quigley C, Herro D, J Sci Educ Technol 25:410–426, 2016; Quigley, Herro, & Jamil. 2017). Based on a qualitative study examining classroom observations, teachers’ reflective journals during STEAM implementation, and focus-group teacher interviews, this chapter will highlight vignettes of these classrooms including elementary and secondary school examples as well as discipline-focused STEAM examples. The goal of this chapter is to inform teacher educators and provide support to teachers who are attempting to implement this transdisciplinary approach to learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahn, C. (2015). EcoScience+ art initiative: Designing a new paradigm for college education, scholarship, and service. The STEAM Journal, 2(1), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, M. B., Hall, D. T., & Lawrence, B. S. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of career theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillee, C., & Catalano, G. (2009). Engineering and society: Working towards social justice [synthesis lectures on engineers, technology and society series]. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry III, R., Reed, P., Ritz, J., Lin, C., Hsiung, S., & Frazier, W. (2004). STEM initiatives: Stimulating students to improve science and mathematics achievement. The Technology Teacher, 64(4), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. M., Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Interpretations of graphs by university biology students and practicing scientists: Toward a social practice view of scientific representation practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 1020–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (2002). Systems thinking, systems practice; soft systems methodology: A 30-year retrospective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(2), 37-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogies, 5(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v5i2.4458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, A. (2009). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary collaboration: Implications for vocational psychology. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 9(2), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Academic Medicine, 75(3), 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, M. (2014). Schools shift from STEM to STEAM. Edtech, April 2, 1–4. http://www.edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2014/04/schools-shift-stem-steam.

  • Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience (1934). ALA Booklist, 30, 272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galand, B., Bourgeois, E., & Frenay, M. (2005). The impact of a PBL curriculum on students’ motivation and self-regulation. Cashiers de Recherche en Education et Formation, 37, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliot, A., Greens, R., Seddon, P., Wilson, M., & Woodham, J. (2011). Bridging STEM to STEAM: Trans-disciplinary research. Centre for Research & Development, Research News, 28, 20–23. Retrieved from http://arts.brighton.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/43989/Research-News-28-on-line.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettings, M. (2016). Putting it all together: STEAM, PBL, scientific method, and the studio habits of mind. Art Education, 69(4), 10–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2015). Transdisciplinarity as epistemology, ontology or principles of practical judgment. In P. Gibbs (Ed.), Transdisciplinary professional learning and practice (pp. 151–164). London: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyotte, K., Sochacka, N., Costantino, T., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. (2015). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM journal, 1(2), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, D., DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2015). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century transform and transcend: Synthesis as a trans-disciplinary approach to thinking and learning. TechTrends, 59(4), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0863-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2016a). Exploring teachers’ perspectives of STEAM teaching: Implications for practice. Professional Development in Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2016b). Innovating with STEAM in middle school classrooms: Remixing education. On the Horizon, 24(3), 190–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A. (2014). STEM vs. STEAM: Do the arts belong. Education Week, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D., Moss, D., Osborn, T. (2003). Beyond the boundaries: A transdisciplinary approach to learning and teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). The effect of STEAM education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. In T. Kim, A. Stoica, W. Fang, T. Vasilakos, J. Villalba, K. Arnett, et al. (Eds.), Computer applications for security, control and system engineering (pp. 115–121). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35264-5_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R. (2003). Creating interdisciplinarity: Grounded definitions from college and university faculty. History of Intellectual Culture, 3(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + Art = Steam. The STEAM Journal, 1(1), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, W. T., & Bunton, S. A. (2005). The functions of centers and institutes in academic biomedical research. Analysis in Brief, 5, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanni-Messegee, L., & Murphy, T. B. (2013). Putting theatre arts to the test: Student performance that Goes beyond STEM and STEAM. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 18(1), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, B., & Ertas, A. (2013). Transdisciplinary theory and practice. Creskill: Hampton Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padurean, A., & Cheveresan, C. T. (2004). Transdisciplinarity in education. EDUCA IA-PLUS Journal Plus Education, 127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, C. (2005). Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures, 37(10), 1159–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, S. (2014). Sparking student interest in STEM by bringing industry experts into the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.newschools.org/news/sparking-student-interest-in-stem-by-bringing-industry-experts-into-the-classroom/.

  • Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, C. F., Harrington, J., Herro, D. (2017a). Moving beyond just adding “A” to STEM: Arts as expression. Science Scope. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. (2017b) STEAM: Conceptual model for transdisciplinary learning. School Science and Mathematics. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (2004). Interdisciplinary issues in nanoscale research. In D. Baird, A. Nordmann, & J. Schummer (Eds.), Discovering the nanoscale (pp. 9–20). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatin, C., Galizzi, M., Melillo, K. D., Mawn, B., & Phase in Healthcare Team. (2004). Conducting interdisciplinary research to promote healthy and safe employment in health care: Promises and pitfalls. Public Health Reports, 119, 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, Y., Jung, S., Kwon, S., Kim, H., & Kim, D. (2012). Analysis of prospective and in-service teachers’awareness of steam convergent education. Journal of Humanities & Social Science, 13(1), 255–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina Social Department of Education. (2011). South Carolina social studies standards. Columbia: State or province government publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50, 25–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, D. T. (1995). Attitudes and opinions of faculty tutors about problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 70(3), 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, D. T., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68(7), 550–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636

  • Watson, A. D. (2015). Design thinking for life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. F. (2003). Problem based learning. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326(7384), 328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yackman, G. (2007). STE@M education. Retrieved from http://steamedu.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA

    Cassie F. Quigley, Dani Herro & Abigail Baker

Authors
  1. Cassie F. Quigley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dani Herro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abigail Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cassie F. Quigley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Myint Swe Khine  & Shaljan Areepattamannil  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Quigley, C.F., Herro, D., Baker, A. (2019). Moving Toward Transdisciplinary Instruction: A Longitudinal Examination of STEAM Teaching Practices. In: Khine, M.S., Areepattamannil, S. (eds) STEAM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04002-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04003-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation