Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship Formation, Division of Housework and Power Negotiation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dynamics and Complexities of Interracial Gay Families in South Africa: A New Frontier

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Sociology ((BRIEFSSOCY))

  • 192 Accesses

Abstract

Having engaged with the historical contextualisation of same-sex relationships and relevant literature in Chapters One and Two, key findings of research conducted are discussed in Chapters Three and Four respectively. In order to understand the complexities and dynamics of interracial gay households in the South African context, this chapter engages with the relationship formation, division of labour and power relations, amongst gay couples. The main channels through which gay partners initiated their relationships were physical face-to-face encounters or social engagements and online dating. The impact of personal resources, such as income, education and race, were examined in the initial coming together of the couples but none of this had any significant influence on their familial arrangements. This chapter also examines how gay couples share housework and participate in the management of domestic duties. In this latter regard, no distinctive hierarchical divisions of labour amongst the participants were evident, notwithstanding their racial backgrounds and differential earnings. Lastly, this chapter suggests that scholars, gender and family experts, should pay attention to how gay partners are resisting and ‘redoing gender’ in their relationships, and theorise gay partners’ experiences distinctively rather than looking at them through a heterosexual lens. Overall, this chapter discusses the formation of relationships, division of household labour, how power is negotiated and what sustains intimacy in interracial gay partnerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adeagbo, O. (2015). ‘Do according to your time, preferences and abilities’: Exploring the division of household labour among interracial gay partners in post-apartheid South Africa. South African Review of Sociology, 46, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adeagbo, O. (2016). ‘Love beyond colour’: The formation of interracial gay men’s intimate relationships in post-apartheid South Africa. National Identities, 18, 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. A. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, G., Noack, T., Seierstad, A., & Weedon-Fekjaer, H. (2006). The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden. Demography, 43, 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barraket, J., & Henry-Waring, M. S. (2008). Getting it on (line): Sociological perspectives on e-dating. Journal of Sociology, 44, 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York: William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Maycock, B., & Burns, S. (2005). Your picture is your bait: Use and meaning of cyberspace among gay men. Journal of sex research, 42, 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, R. (1996). Betwixt and between: An organization’s relationship with online communications. SIECUS Report, 25, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesters, J. (2012). Gender attitudes and housework: Trends over time in Australia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43, 511–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2000). Understanding men: Gender sociology and the New International Research on Masculinities. Clark Lecture, University of Kansas Department of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • December, J. (1996). Units of analysis for Internet communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC), 1, 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, G. A. (1997). Lesbian lifestyles: Women’s work and the politics of sexuality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, G. A. (1998). Introduction: Add sexuality and stir: Towards a broader understanding of the gender dynamics of work and family life. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 2, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course. USA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, C. A., & Ruggles, S. (2000). Historical trends in marriage formation: The United States 1850–1990. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 59–88). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1997). Power strategies in romantic relationships. In American Psychological Association Conference, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2013). “Doing” and “Undoing” gender: The meaning and division of housework in same-sex couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E., Smith, J. Z., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2012). The division of labor in lesbian, gay, and heterosexual new adoptive parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 812–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzaga, G. (2011). How you meet your spouse matters. Retrieved May 12, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, N. K., & Clark, M. S. (2001). Perceiving unfairness in the family: Cause or consequence of marital distress? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, N. K., Naylor, K. E., & Clark, M. S. (2002). Perceiving the division of family work to be unfair: Do social comparisons, enjoyment, and competence matter? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 510–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1984). Gay couples. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J., & DeVall, W. B. (1978). The social organization of gay males. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., Browner, C. H., & Sherman, C. A. (2002). Relationship power, decision making, and sexual relations: An exploratory study with couples of Mexican origin. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100, 130–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L. (2002). Power. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berschied, A. Christensen, et al. (Eds.), Close relationships. New York: Percheron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M., & Schwartz, P. (1995). The relationships of lesbians and of gay men. In S. Duck & J. Wood (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). “His” and “her” relationships? A review of the empirical evidence. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen, L. K., & Jepsen, C. A. (2002). An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples. Demography, 39, 435–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen, C. A., & Jepsen, L. K. (2006). The sexual division of labor within households: Comparisons of couples to roommates. Eastern Economic Journal, 32, 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 880–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 251–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2006). Differences between partners from heterosexual, gay, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. (1992). Clinical life: A clinicians guide. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbe, C. (2007). Mothers, fathers or parents: Same-gendered families in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 260–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. (2006). Online dating: Americans who are seeking romance use the Internet to help them in their search, but there is still widespread public concern about the safety of online dating. Pew Internet & American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple: How relationships develop. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, S., & Barrett, A. E. (2014). Online dating in middle and later life: Gendered expectations and experiences. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 411–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, E. R., & Richardson, R. A. (2000). Digital dating and virtual relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships. Family Relations, 49, 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milani, T. M. (2013). Are ‘queers’ really ‘queer’? Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society, 24, 615–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., & Perlman, D. (2009). Intimate relationship. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, K., Smit, R., & Seedat-Khan, M. (2012). Gender politics and work-family integration: Persisting exclusions at two South African universities. In T. Uys & S. Patel (Eds.), Exclusion, social capital and citizenship: Contested transitions in South Africa and India. New Delhi: Orient Black Swan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerton, S. (1997). “Queer housewives?”: Some problems in theorising the division of domestic labour in lesbian and gay households. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M. W., & Thorne, B. (1993). Feminist theories: The social construction of gender in families and society. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öun, I. (2013). Is it fair to share? Perceptions of fairness in the division of housework among couples in 22 countries. Social Justice Research, 26, 400–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., & Cochran, S. D. (1980). Sex differences in values concerning love relationships. In Annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. W. (2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., & Spalding, L. R. (2000). The close relationships of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlesz, A., Power, J., Brown, R., McNair, R., Schofield, M., Pitts, M., et al. (2010). Organising work and home in same-sex parented families: Findings from the work love play study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, R. N., & Borland, E. (2009). Bachelorhood and men’s attitudes about gender roles. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 140–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., & Walker, A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, C., & Shapira-Berman, O. (1997). Egalitarianism and marital happiness: Israeli wives and husbands on a collision course? American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recio, E. M. (2000). A unified theory on homosexual identity. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, M. E., & Lynch, J. M. (1990). Power-sharing in lesbian partnerships. Journal of Homosexuality, 19, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual communication: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robnett, B., & Feliciano, C. (2011). Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Social Forces, 89, 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2010). How couples meet and stay together, Wave 2 version 2.04. In Machine Readable Data File. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries. http://data.stanford.edu/hcmst.

  • Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautter, J. M., Tippett, R. M., & Philip Morgan, S. (2010). The social demography of Internet dating in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 554–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage: How love between equals really works. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechory, M., & Ziv, R. (2007). Relationships between gender role attitudes, role division, and perception of equity among heterosexual, gay and lesbian couples. Sex Roles, 56, 629–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (2004). Cruising to familyland: Gay hypergamy and rainbow kinship. Current Sociology, 52, 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (2005). The families of man: Gay male intimacy and kinship in a global metropolis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1911–1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (2006). Gay parenthood and the decline of paternity as we knew it. Sexualities, 9, 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephure, R. J., Boon, S. D., MacKinnon, S. L., & Deveau, V. L. (2009). Internet initiated relationships: Associations between age and involvement in online dating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 658–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, F. (2002). Lesbian and gay parenting. In A. Coyle & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: New perspectives. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veniegas, R. C., & Peplau, L. A. (1997). Power and the quality of same-sex friendships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. J. (1996). Couples watching television: Gender, power, and the remote control. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 813–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society, 23, 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (1996). Intimacy and the Internet. Contemporary Sexuality, 30, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. (2012). Doing gender, doing culture: Division of domestic labour among lesbians in Hong Kong. Women’s Studies International Forum, 35, 266–275. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Oluwafemi Adeagbo

Authors
  1. Oluwafemi Adeagbo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oluwafemi Adeagbo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adeagbo, O. (2019). Relationship Formation, Division of Housework and Power Negotiation. In: The Dynamics and Complexities of Interracial Gay Families in South Africa: A New Frontier. SpringerBriefs in Sociology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03922-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03922-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03921-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03922-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation