Abstract
Starch is a major source of carbohydrate in human diets and its over-consumption can contribute to the development of obesity and to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Various starch-rich foods in the human diet are digested at different rates and to different extents. Understanding of the reasons for these observed differences should allow for development of functional foods that are digested relatively slowly. Enzyme kinetic studies of α-amylase action on starch in vitro are valuable for predicting how starch is digested in vivo and for providing understanding of how starch structure and hydrothermal processing (cooking) affect digestibility. Since starch consumed in foods such as cereal products, legumes and root vegetables has usually been subjected to commercial and/or domestic cooking, knowledge of the changes in the kinetics of amylolysis subsequent to starch processing provides important and relevant dietary information.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baldwin, A. J., Egan, D. L., Warren, F. J., Barker, P. D., Dobson, C. M., Butterworth, P. J., et al. (2015). Investigating the mechanisms of amylolysis of starch granules by solution-state NMR. Biomacromolecules, 16, 1614–1621.
Brand-Miller, J. C., Holt, S. H., Pawlak, D. B., & McMillan, J. (2002). Glycemic index and obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76, 281S–285S.
Butterworth, P. J., Warren, F. J., & Ellis, P. R. (2011). Human α-amylase and starch digestion: An interesting marriage. Starch/Starke, 63, 395–405.
Butterworth, P. J., Warren, F. J., Grassby, T., Patel, H., & Ellis, P. R. (2012). Analysis of starch amylolysis using plots for first-order kinetics. Carbohydrate Polymers, 87, 2189–2197.
Canani, R. B., Di Constanzo, M., Leone, I., Pefata, M., Meli, R., & Calignano, A. (2011). Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 17, 1519–1528.
Dhital, S., Gidley, M. J., & Warren, F. J. (2015). Inhibition of α-amylase activity by cellulose: Kinetic analysis and nutritional implication. Carbohydrate Polymers, 123, 305–312.
Dhital, S., Shrestha, A. K., & Gidley, M. J. (2010). Relationship between granule size and in vitro digestibility of maize and potato starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, 82, 480–488.
Dhital, S., Warren, F. R., Butterworth, P. J., Ellis, P. R., & Gidley, M. J. (2017). Mechanisms of starch digestion by α-amylase: Structural basis for kinetic properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(5), 875–892.
Dona, A. C., Pages, G., Gilbert, R. G., & Kuchel, P. W. (2010). Digestion of starch: In vivo and in vitro kinetic models used to characterize oligosaccharide or glucose release. Carbohydrate Polymers, 80, 599–617.
Edwards, C. H., Warren, F. J., Milligan, P. J., Butterworth, P. J., & Ellis, P. R. (2014). A novel method for classifying starch digestion by modeling the amylolysis of plant foods using first-order enzyme kinetic principles. Food and Function, 5, 2751–2758.
Ellis, P. R., Apling, A. C., Leeds, A. R., & Bolster, N. R. (1981). Guar bread: Acceptability and efficacy combined. Studies on blood glucose, serum insulin and satiety in normal subjects. The British Journal of Nutrition, 46, 267–276.
Elodi, P., Mora, S., & Krysteva, M. (1972). Investigation of the active centre of porcine pancreatic amylase. European Journal of Biochemistry, 24, 577–582.
Englyst, H. N., Kingman, S. M., & Cummings, J. H. (1992). Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, 33–50.
Fersht, A. (1999). Enzyme structure and mechanism (pp. 110–111). New York: W.H. Freeman.
Goni, I., Garcia-Alonso, A., & Saura-Calixto, F. (1997). A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index. Nutrition Research, 17, 427–437.
Henrissat, B., & Davies, G. J. (2000). Glycoside hydrolases and glycosyltransferases: Families, modules and implications for genomics. Plant Physiology, 124, 1515–1519.
Htoon, A., Shrestha, A. K., Flanagan, B. M., Lopez-Rubio, A., Bird, E. P., Gilbert, E. P., et al. (2009). Effects of processing high amylose maize starches under controlled conditions on structural organization and amylase digestibility. Carbohydrate Polymers, 75, 236–245.
Kansou, K., Buleon, A., Gerard, C., & Rolland-Sabaté, A. (2015). Multivariate model to characterize relations between maize mutant starches and hydrolysis kinetics. Carbohydrate Polymers, 133, 497–506.
Kopelman, R. (1988). Fractal reaction kinetics. Science, 241(4873), 1620–1626.
Kung, J.-F. T., Hanrahan, V. M., & Caldwell, M. L. (1953). A comparison of the action of several alpha amylases upon a linear fraction from corn starch. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 75, 5548–5554.
Mahasukhonthachat, K., Sopade, P. A., & Gidley, M. J. (2010). Kinetics of starch digestion in sorghum as affected by particle size. Journal of Food Engineering, 96, 18–28.
McCroskey, R., Chang, T., David, H., & Winn, E. (1982). p-Nitrophenylglycosides as substrates for measurement of amylase in serum and urine. Clinical Chemistry, 28, 1787–1791.
McGregor, E. A., Janecek, S., & Svensson, B. (2011). Relationship of sequence structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1546, 1–20.
McLaren, A. D. (1963). Enzyme reactions in structurally restricted systems IV. The digestion of insoluble substrates by hydrolytic enzymes. Enzymologia, 26, 237–246.
Moretti, R., & Torson, J. S. (2008). A comparison of sugar indicators enables a universal high throughput sugar-1-phosphate nucleotidyltransferase assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 377(2), 251–258.
Patel, H., Royall, P. G., Gaisford, S., Williams, G. R., Edwards, C. H., Warren, F. J., et al. (2016). Structural and enzyme kinetic studies of retrograded starch: Inhibition of α-amylase and consequences for intestinal digestion of starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 164, 154–161.
Poulsen, B. R., Ruiter, G., Visser, J., Jorgen, J., Iversen, J. J. L. (2003). Determination of first order rate constants by natural logarithm of the slope plot exemplified by analysis of Aspergillus niger in batch culture. Biotechnology Letters, 25, 565–571.
Robyt, J. F., & French, D. (1967). Multiple attack hypothesis of α-amylase: Action of porcine pancreatic, human salivary and Aspergillus oryzae α-amylases. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 122, 8–16.
Seigner, C., Prodanov, E., & Marchis-Mouren, C. (1995). On porcine pancreatic α-amylase action: Kinetic evidence for the binding of two maltooligosaccharides (maltose, maltotriose and o-nitrophenylmaltoside) by inhibition studies. Correlation with the five-subsite energy profile. European Journal of Biochemistry, 148, 161–168.
Seigner, C., Proganov, E., & Marchis-Mouren, G. (1987). The determination of substrate binding energies of porcine pancreatic α-amylase by comparing hydrolytic activity towards substrates. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 913, 200–209.
Slaughter, S. L., Ellis, P. R., & Butterworth, P. J. (2001). An investigation of the action of porcine pancreatic α-amylase on native and gelatinized starches. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1525, 29–36.
Slaughter, S. L., Ellis, P. R., Jackson, E. C., & Butterworth, P. J. (2002). The effect of guar galactomannan and water availability during hydrothermal processing on the hydrolysis of starch catalysed by pancreatic α-amylase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1571, 55–63.
Smith, B. W., & Roe, J. H. (1949). A photometric method for the determination of α-amylase in blood and urine with use of the starch-iodine color. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 179, 53–59.
Walker, W. J., & Hope, P. M. (1963). The action of some α-amylases on starch granules. The Biochemical Journal, 86, 452–462.
Warren, F. J., Butterworth, P. J., & Ellis, P. R. (2012). Studies of the effect of maltose on the direct binding of porcine pancreatic α-amylase to maize starch. Carbohydrate Research, 358, 67–71.
Warren, F. J., Butterworth, P. J., & Ellis, P. R. (2013). The surface structure of a complex substrate revealed by enzyme kinetics and Freundlich constants for α-amylase interaction with the surface of starch. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1830, 3095–3101.
Warren, F. J., Royall, P. G., Gaisford, S., Butterworth, P. J., & Ellis, P. R. (2011). Binding interactions of α-amylase with starch granules: The influence of supramolecular structure and surface area. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86, 1038–1047.
Warren, F. J., Zhang, B., Waltzer, G., Gidley, M. J., & Dhital, S. (2015). The interplay of α-amylase and amyloglucosidase activities on the digestion of starch in in vitro enzymic systems. Carbohydrate Polymers, 117, 192–200.
Zhang, X., Caner, C., Kwan, E., Li, C., Brayer, G. D., & Withers, S. G. (2016). Evaluation of the significance of starch surface binding sites on human pancreatic α-amylase. Biochemistry, 55, 6000–6009.
Zou, W., Sissons, M., Gidley, M. J., Gilbert, R. G., & Warren, F. J. (2015). Combined technique for characterizing pasta structure reveals how the gluten network slows enzyme digestion. Food Chemistry, 188, 559–568.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butterworth, P.J., Ellis, P.R. (2019). Kinetics of α-Amylase Action on Starch. In: Gouseti, O., Bornhorst, G., Bakalis, S., Mackie, A. (eds) Interdisciplinary Approaches to Food Digestion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03901-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03901-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03900-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03901-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)