Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differentiating Between Supply and Supplier Risk for Better Supply Chain Risk Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revisiting Supply Chain Risk

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Supply Chain Management ((SSSCM,volume 7))

  • 5116 Accesses

Abstract

■■■

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvarez, G., Pilbeam, C., & Wilding, R. (2010). Nestlé Nespresso AAA sustainable quality program: An investigation into the governance dynamics in a multi-stakeholder supply chain network. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blengini, G. A., et al. (2017). EU methodology for critical raw materials assessment: Policy needs and proposed solutions for incremental improvements. Resources Policy, 53, 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2009). Single versus multiple sourcing: A supply risk management perspective. In G. A. Zsidisin & B. Ritchie (Eds.), Supply chain risk—A handbook of assessment, management, and performance 124 (pp. 125–135). New York (US): Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, G. J., Carrillo, J. E., & Vakharia, A. J. (2007). Single versus multiple supplier sourcing strategies. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Sohal, A. S., & Prajogo, D. I. (2013). Supply chain operational risk mitigation: A collaborative approach. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 2186–2199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Zhao, X., & Shen, Z.-J. (2015). Risk mitigation benefit from backup suppliers in the presence of the horizontal fairness concern. Decision Sciences, 46(4), 663–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. (2014). Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., et al. (2011). Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(2), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., Lowson, R., & Peck, H. (2004). Creating agile supply chains in the fashion industry. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 3(8), 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellegaard, C. (2008). Supply risk management in a small company perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(6), 425–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, P. (2004). Supply chain risk management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 183–196, Web. 14 Mar. 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerstl, K., et al. (2010). Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment-sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(2), 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudenzi, B., et al. (2018). An exploration of factors influencing the choice of commodity price risk mitigation strategies. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management January, 24(3), 218–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016). Supplier risk assessment based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and ELECTRE TRI-C: A case illustration involving service suppliers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(2), 339–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualandris, J., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2015). Supply risk management and competitive advantage: A misfit model. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(3), 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallikas, J., Virolainen, V.-M., & Tuominen, M. (2002). Risk analysis and assessment in network environments: A dyadic case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C., Brenchley, R., & Walker, H. (2003). Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(2), 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, Y. (2017). Supply risk sharing in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 183(Part A), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W., et al. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 7543, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, E. (2011). Natural hedging as a risk prophylaxis and supplier financing instrument in automotive supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(2), 128–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K., Lim, Y., & Oh, J. (2011). A model for measuring supplier risk: Do operational capability indicators enhance the prediction accuracy of supplier risk? British Journal of Management, 22, 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalahmadia, M., & Mahour, M.-P. (2017). An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, T. J., & Talluri, S. (2008). A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., et al. (2017). Implications from substance flow analysis, supply chain and supplier’ risk evaluation in iron and steel industry in mainland China. Resources Policy, 51, 272–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manikandan, L., Thamaraiselvan, N., & Punniyamoorthy, M. (2011). An instrument to assess supply chain risk: Establishing content validity. International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, 4(4), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3), 192–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, D., et al. (2016). Bridging and buffering: Strategies for mitigating supply risk and improving supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. V., et al. (2017). Developing visibility to mitigate supplier risk: The role of power-dependence structure. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9(1), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourbakhsh, V., Ahmadi, A., & Mahootchi, M. (2013). Considering supply risk for supplier selection using an integrated framework of data envelopment analysis and neural networks. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(2), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H. (2006). Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics, 9(2), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radivojević, G., & Gajović, V. (2014). Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and fuzzy AHP methods. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi, A., & Clemons, E. K. (2005). Just right outsourcing: Understanding and managing risk introduction. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-New York (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, S., et al. (2016). Internal visibility of external supplier risks and the dynamics of risk management silos. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(4), 451–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, P. R., Whitman, L. E., & Malzahn, D. (2004). Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, D., Patil, R., & Shah, J. (2015). Sequential unreliable newsboy ordering policies. Annals of Operations Research, 233(1), 449–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, Y. K., & Tan, K. H. (2011). Managing product quality risk in a multi-tier global supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 49(1), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, R. (2015). An Insurance model for the protection of corporations against the bankruptcy of suppliers by using the black-scholes-merton model. European Journal of Economics, Finance, and Administrative Sciences, 76, 38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanadham, N., & Samvedi, A. (2013). Supplier selection based on supply chain ecosystem, performance and risk criteria. International Journal of Production Research, 51(21), 6484–6498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsworth, J. (2016). GM scrambles after supplier bankruptcy. Automotive News, 2016, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Gilland, W., & Tomlin, B. (2010). Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 12(3), 489–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A. (2003). A grounded definition of supply risk. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(5–6), 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A. (2016). Identifying and managing supply quality risk. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(3), 908–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A., Panelli, A. & Upton, R. (2000). Purchasing organization involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(4), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh

    Sudipa Sarker

Authors
  1. Sudipa Sarker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudipa Sarker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    George A. Zsidisin

  2. TU Dortmund University, Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics IML, Dortmund, Germany

    Michael Henke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sarker, S. (2019). Differentiating Between Supply and Supplier Risk for Better Supply Chain Risk Management. In: Zsidisin, G., Henke, M. (eds) Revisiting Supply Chain Risk. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation