Skip to main content

Facing a Fragmented Neighbourhood: The EU and Six Eastern Partnership Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The EU in a Trans-European Space

Abstract

After the so-called eastern crisis engulfed the EU Neighbourhood, attention was drawn in particular to the mismatch between eastern neighbours’ needs and vulnerabilities and the EU assistance, to the changing geopolitical context in the region as well as to the limits of the EU transformative power. This chapter focuses on six countries—Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan—that fall under the EU-Eastern Partnership framework. It takes stock of the ‘pre-crisis’ evolution of the European Neighbourhood Policy in the east by crossing two dimensions: the outside-in policies promoted by the EU vis-à-vis its eastern neighbours and the inside-in practices of adaptation, contestation, or subversion of EU programmes by local actors. This exploration helps illuminate broader questions about the limits and enabling conditions for the EU’s transformative power in its neighbourhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter builds on the previous analysis produced for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (see, e.g. Youngs and Pishchikova (2013) Smart Geostrategy as well as the author’s commentaries for Strategic Europe, and Eurasia Outlook blogs). The author is thankful to Richard Youngs for this inspiring collaboration.

  2. 2.

    See also chapter “Russia’s Strategy of Forging Spaces Around Itself” by Penkova in this volume.

  3. 3.

    Putin’s visit to the Azeri capital Baku to sign four-billion worth of advanced weaponry sales contract only days before Armenia’s decision did not go unnoticed.

  4. 4.

    In addition to Russia’s alleged attempts to meddle in a number of elections in EU member states, its courting of anti-EU parties, and its blackmailing of more vulnerable EU member states, the recent Salisbury attack reinforced the perception of Russia as an immediate security threat to the west and led to a tit-for-tat diplomatic stand-off unprecedented in the post-Cold War history.

  5. 5.

    See also chapter “Re-conceptualising EU-North Africa Relations: ‘Outside-In’ and ‘Inside-Out’ Dynamics” by Colombo in this volume.

  6. 6.

    Multilateral platforms include: 1. Democracy, good governance and stability; 2. Economic integration and convergence with EU policies; 3. Energy security; 4. Contacts between people; and six flagship initiatives: Integrated Border Management Programme; Small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) Facility; Regional energy markets and energy efficiency; Diversification of energy supply; Prevention of, preparedness for, and response to natural and man-made disasters; Good environmental governance.

  7. 7.

    See also chapter “From a Regional to a Global Power, in Potency: The EU’s Global Strategy” by Giusti in this volume.

  8. 8.

    See also the publications with indexes for previous year at http://www.eap-index.eu

References

  • Agnew, J. 2001. How Many Europes? European Urban and Regional Studies 8 (1): 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicchi, F. 2006. ‘Our Size Fits All’: Normative Power Europe and the Mediterranean. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 286–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blockmans, S., and H. Kostanyan. 2013. A Post-Mortem of the Vilnius Summit: Not Yet a Thessaloniki Moment for the Eastern Partnership. CEPS Commentary, December 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T., and Y. Pamuk. 2011. Pathologies of Europeanisation: Fighting Corruption in the Southern Caucasus. West European Politics 35 (1): 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T., and T. Risse. 2004. One Size Fits All! EU Policies for the Promotion of Human Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law. Workshop on Democracy Promotion, Center for Development, Democracy, and the Rule of Law, October 4–5. Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction. West European Politics 35 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouris, D., and T. Schumacher, eds. 2017. The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy: Continuity and Change in EU Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy, June 2016. Brussels: Council of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, M., and I. Karolewski. 2017. What Type of Power Has the EU Exercised in the Ukraine–Russia Crisis? A Framework of Analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (1): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delcour, L. 2015. The 2015 ENP Review: Beyond Stocktaking, the Need for a Political Strategy. College of Europe Policy Brief, No. 1, Bruge: CEBOP.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The EU and Russia in Their ‘Contested Neighbourhood’: Multiple External Influences, Policy Transfer and Domestic Change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Lost in Transition: The Liberal International Order in Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus. The International Spectator 53 (1): 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delcour, L., and K. Wolczuk. 2013. Beyond the Vilnius Summit: Challenges for Deeper EU Integration with Eastern Europe. European Policy Centre Policy Brief, October 31. Brussels: European Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. 2017. Eastern Partnership Index 2015–2016. Brussels: Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. 2014. After the Vilnius Fiasco: Who Is to Blame? What Is to Be Done? CEPS Essays 8. Prague: CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2002. Paving the Way for a New Neighbourhood Instrument, COM(2003)393. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Wider Europe—Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with Our Eastern and Southern Neighbours, COM (2003) 104 Final. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy, COM(2006) 726. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Eastern Partnership. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, COM(2008)823. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyburg, T., S. Lavenex, F. Schimmelfennig, T. Skripka, and A. Wetzel. 2009. EU Promotion of Democratic Governance in the Neighbourhood. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (6): 916–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gänzle, S. 2009. EU Governance and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Europe-Asia Studies 61 (10): 1715–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gstöhl, S., and S. Schunz, eds. 2016. Theorizing the European Neighbourhood Policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde-Price, A. 2006. ‘Normative’ Power Europe: A Realist Critique. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. A ‘Tragic Actor’? A Realist Perspective on ‘Ethical Power Europe’. International Affairs 84 (1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Realism and the European Neighbourhood Policy. In The Routledge Handbook of European Neighbourhood Policy, ed. T. Schumacher, A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber, 60–69. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. 2001. The Governance Approach to European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 39 (2): 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karolewski, I., and M. Cross. 2017. The EU’s Power in the Russia–Ukraine Crisis: Enabled or Constrained? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (1): 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. 2006. New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms Through the New European Neighbourhood Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (1): 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B., and Rittberger. 2006. The ‘Governance Turn’ in EU Studies. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (1): 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korosteleva, E. 2011. Change or Continuity: Is the Eastern Partnership an Adequate Tool for the European Neighbourhood? International Relations 25 (2): 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Putting the EU Global Security Strategy to Test: ‘Cooperative Orders’ and Othering in EU–Russia Relations. International Politics, first online 19 December 2017, doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0128-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudelia, S. 2012. Risky Politics: Repression and Resistance in Slavic Autocracies. SAIS Review XXXII (2): 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. When External Leverage Fails: The Case of Yulia Tymoshenko’s Trial. Problems of Post-Communism 60 (1): 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, J., and T. Börzel. 2013. Introduction: Explaining Policy Change in the European Union’s Eastern Neighbourhood. Europe-Asia Studies 65 (4): 571–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. 2008. A Governance Perspective on the European Neighbourhood Policy: Integration Beyond Conditionality. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 938–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S., and F. Schimmelfennig. 2009. EU Rules Beyond EU Borders: Theorizing External Governance in European Politics. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (6): 791–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I., and R. Whitman. 2003. The Difference Engine’: Constructing and Representing the International Identity of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 10 (3): 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishchikova, K., and E. Piras. 2017. The European Union Global Strategy: What Kind of Foreign Policy Identity? The International Spectator 52 (3): 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, R. 2002. A Wider Europe—A Proximity Policy as the Key to Stability. European Commission Press Release, December 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, G. 2008. The European Neighbourhood Policy: Conditionality Revisited for the EU’s Eastern Neighbours. Europe-Asia Studies 60 (2): 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. 2007. Europeanization Beyond Europe. Living Reviews in European Governance 4 (3): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F., and S. Lavenex, eds. 2011. Democracy Promotion in the EU’s Neighbourhood: From Leverage to Governance? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F., and H. Scholtz. 2008. EU Democracy Promotion in the European Neighbourhood: Political Conditionality, Economic Development and Transnational Exchange. European Union Politics 9 (2): 187–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2004. Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal for European Public Policy 11 (4): 661–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, T., A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of European Neighbourhood Policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapovalova, N. 2009. The EU’s Eastern Partnership: Still-Born?, FRIDE Policy Brief No. 11, Madrid: FRIDE

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., and R. Youngs. 2018. The EU and the Global Order: Contingent Liberalism. The International Spectator 53 (1): 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toal, G. 2017. Near Abroad: Putin, the West and the Contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. 1997. Imperial Metaphors: Emerging European Analogies to Pre-Nation-State Imperial Systems. In Geopolitics in Post-Wall Europe: Security, Territory, and Identity, ed. O. Tunander, P. Baev, and V. Einagel, 59–93. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R. 2017. Europe’s Eastern Crisis: Geopolitics of Asymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R., and K. Pishchikova. 2013. Smart Geostrategy for the Eastern Partnership. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pishchikova, K. (2019). Facing a Fragmented Neighbourhood: The EU and Six Eastern Partnership Countries. In: Giusti, S., Mirkina, I. (eds) The EU in a Trans-European Space. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03679-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics