Skip to main content

Energy Security and Geopolitics in the Trans-Europe Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The EU in a Trans-European Space

Abstract

Energy constitutes a crucial matter for both the EU countries and the states in the European neighborhood. Notwithstanding the exceptional effort in decarbonizing and in fostering renewable energies, EU countries still depend on imports of hydrocarbons from extra-EU countries. This dependence has deep implications both in terms of security of supply for member states and in terms of price paid for energy by end consumers. Starting from an assessment of the drivers of demand, supply and prices, the chapter will examine the role of geopolitical issues in shaping the energy sector by considering two broad case studies: the relations of the EU with its main natural gas supplier, Russia, and with the world’s main oil suppliers, countries in the Middle East.

The contents, views and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any of the author’s employers or organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See BP Energy Outlook (2017) and OECD (2017), Primary energy supply (indicator). doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/1b33c15a-en (accessed on 16 November 2017).

  2. 2.

    International Energy Agency (2016), World Energy Outlook. OECD, Paris.

  3. 3.

    A specific asset is a situation “where a transaction requires one agent to commit capital that has little value for other uses”. For more on asset specificity and the related risks, see Creti, A., and Villeneuve, B. (2004). Long-term contracts and take-or-pay clauses in natural gas markets. Energy Studies Review, 13(1), 1.

  4. 4.

    In the case of electricity international trade is limited and therefore less politicised with respect to oil and gas.

  5. 5.

    ENI World Oil and Gas review (2017).

  6. 6.

    Of course, if the ratio is 0 there is no production at all; if it is below 1, the gas produced is insufficient to cover the consumption; if the ratio is higher than 1, then the country is (or may be) a net exporter.

  7. 7.

    LNG stands for Liquefied Natural Gas, that is, gas that is liquefied at a temperature of −162 °C, compressed in tanks and transported via ships.

  8. 8.

    Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). See further in the chapter for more detail.

  9. 9.

    Among the many articles dedicated to this topic, see Time, “Russia-Europe Gas Spat Ends — For Now”. Link: http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1870597,00.html

  10. 10.

    OPEC is an intergovernmental organisation founded in 1960 in Baghdad and headquartered, since 1965, in Vienna. As of 2017 OPEC’s members are: Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela.

  11. 11.

    Even though contrary to the intervention, Italy eventually participated to the NATO mission, while Germany did not.

  12. 12.

    The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf, originally known as the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), is a regional intergovernmental political and economic union consisting of all Arab states of the Persian Gulf, except for Iraq. Its member states are Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

  13. 13.

    There were already several sanctions in place against Iran, since after the Iranian Revolution of 1979, especially from the US, which led international efforts to use sanctions to influence Iran’s policies. In 2006 the UN Security Council imposed sanctions after Iran refused to suspend its uranium enrichment programme.

  14. 14.

    Reuters: “France to finance exports to Iran, aims to sidestep U.S. sanctions”, published on 1 February 2018. Link: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-france-usa/france-to-finance-exports-to-iran-aims-to-sidestep-u-s-sanctions-idUSKBN1FL48U?il=0

References

  • ACER. 2011. Framework Guidelines on Gas Balancing in Transmission Systems. Published on 18 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creti, A., and B. Villeneuve. 2004. Long-Term Contracts and Take-Or-Pay Clauses in Natural Gas Markets. Energy Studies Review 13 (1): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, K.J., and S.E. Masten. 1988. Mitigating Contractual Hazards: Unilateral Options and Contract Length. The Rand Journal of Economics 19 (3): 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan, S., and L. Mottaghi. 2015. Economic Implications of Lifting Sanctions on Iran. MENA Quarterly Economic Brief. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eni. 2017. World Oil and Gas Review. Available Online at https://www.eni.com.

  • European Commission. 2010. Energy 2020: A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. 2009. Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Natural Gas and Repealing Directive 2003/55/EC, L211. Official Journal of the European Union, 94–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J., and T. Mitrova. 2016. Energy Relations Between Russia and China: Playing Chess with the Dragon. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). 2018. Monthly Prices Statistics (Data up to February 2018). Paris: IEA/OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., and E. Stromquist. 2014. The Russian Gas Sector: A Political Risk Case Study. Houston, Texas, USA: James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P.L. 1985. Vertical Integration and Long-Term Contracts: The Case of Coal-Burning Electric Generating Plants. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1 (1): 33–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Contract Duration and Relationship-Specific Investments: Empirical Evidence from Coal Markets. The American Economic Review 77 (1): 168–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miriello, C., and M. Polo. 2015. The Development of Gas Hubs in Europe. Energy Policy 84: 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hirschhausen, C., and A. Neumann. 2008. Long-Term Contracts and Asset Specificity Revisited: An Empirical Analysis of Producer–Importer Relations in the Natural Gas Industry. Review of Industrial Organization 32 (2): 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22 (2): 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miriello, C. (2019). Energy Security and Geopolitics in the Trans-Europe Space. In: Giusti, S., Mirkina, I. (eds) The EU in a Trans-European Space. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03679-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics