Skip to main content

Economic Challenges in Trans-Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The EU in a Trans-European Space
  • 384 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter analyses the outcomes of recent economic agreements and unions that have affected the interests and attitudes of multiple actors in the Trans-European space. The author explores the effects of these unions on trade flows and investment, both in the EU and in ten countries of the EU neighborhood. The chapter contributes to the book’s narrative by examining spill-over effects of financial crises and financial sanctions across the whole area. Using a comparative approach, Mirkina explains differences in the choices that the EU’s neighbors must make. Examining the consequences of these choices helps in predicting the economic and political trajectories of each country, describing antagonistic forces that impair their economic integration and security and highlighting issues that should be resolved before steady development in this area could be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also chapter “Iran: An Unrecognized Regional Power” by Perteghella, chapter “Saudi Arabia’s Regional Space-Shaping: Making or Unmaking a Region?” by Santini and Costantini and chapter “Shifting Dynamics in Turkish Foreign Policy in the Trans-European Space” by Baracani and Çalımlı in this volume.

  2. 2.

    See also chapter “Facing a Fragmented Neighbourhood: The EU and Six Eastern Partnership Countries” by Pishchikova in this volume.

  3. 3.

    The Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements (DCFTA) in both countries are officially in force since July 2016, although some parts have been provisionally applied since September 2014.

  4. 4.

    The informal approval of the observer status for Moldova has been granted at the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council meeting in August 2017 and is expected to be formally approved in 2018. One of the issues delaying the approval was the apparent lack of a statute on the EAEU observer countries, which would regulate their relationship with the union. Putin, V. (2017) Press statement following CIS and SEEC summits, October 11, 2017. Accessed February 1, 2018 http://en.kremlin.ru/catalog/keywords/126/events/55820

  5. 5.

    The Moldovan economy still heavily depends on remittances (accounting for 23 per cent of the country’s GDP), a large part of which comes from Russia (EU Directorate-General for External Policies 2017). Since 2014, however, individual money transfers to Moldova followed almost the same trend as trade flows: remittances from the EAEU countries dropped from 66.3 per cent in 2013 to 34.9 per cent in 2017, while remittance from the EU countries slowly rose from 18.6 per cent in 2013 to 34.4 per cent in 2017 (Vlas 2018).

  6. 6.

    Since over 60 per cent of Russia’s export revenues came from oil and gas up until 2015, there is no doubt that the economic growth of the EAEU has been largely driven by oil. The lack of true domestic modernisation meant that the Russian economy did not adjust to competitive forces, and instead largely kept relying on the government to protect its markets. This was a recipe for economic stagnation even before the imposition of sanctions and was only compounded by Russia’s continuing use of trade as a political weapon.

  7. 7.

    Remittances constituted about 45 per cent of GDP in Tajikistan, 30 per cent in the Kyrgyz Republic, 24 per cent in Moldova, and 20 per cent of GDP in Armenia as of 2015, with the bulk of these remittances originating from Russia.

  8. 8.

    By the authors’ own admission, the assessment was fairly optimistic because it was based on the 2011 data, predating sanctions and conflicts (Felbermayr and Gröschl 2017).

  9. 9.

    Also discussed in detail in chapter “China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Eurasia: Space-Shaping as Ordering” by Caffarena and Gabusi in this volume.

References

  • Adarov, A., and P. Havlik. 2017. Challenges of DCFTAs: How can Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine succeed?, no. 18. Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzarov, A. 2018. Ukraine and China: Seeking Economic Opportunity within a Framework of Risk. Washington, DC: Wilson Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimino-Isaacs, C. and K. Katzman. 2017. Iran’s Expanding Economic Relations with Asia. Congressional Research Service Reports, November 29, 2017. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1094521/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Council of the EU. 2017. Conclusions on a Future EU Industrial Policy Strategy. Press Release, May 29, 2017. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/05/29/compet-conclusions-future-industrial-policy-strategy/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • ECORYS-CASE. 2012. Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of Negotiations of a DCFTA between the EU and Georgia and the Republic of Moldova. Rotterdam: ECORYS Netherlands and Center for Social and Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIU. 2017. Another Challenging Four Years Ahead for Iran’s Economy. The Economist Intelligence Unit Country Report, May 26, 2017. http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=1825475566&Country=Iran&topic=Economy. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Emerson, M. 2018. The Strategic Potential of the Emerging Wider European Economic Area, CEPS Policy Insights No 2018/05. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, P. 2018. ‘Make Trade, Not War’ is China’s Daring Plan in the Middle East. Asia Times, January 18, 2018. http://www.atimes.com/article/make-trade-not-war-chinas-daring-plan-middle-east/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • EU Directorate-General for External Policies. 2017. The State of Implementation of the Associations and Free Trade Agreements with Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. Study QA-05-17-170-EN-N. Brussels: European Parliament Directorate-General for External Policies.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission Directorate-General for Trade. 2018. Client and Supplier Countries of the EU28 in Merchandise Trade (2017, Excluding intra-EU Trade). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_122530.03.2018.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Eurostat. 2018. International Trade in Goods. Luxembourg: European Commission, Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/international-tradein-goods/data/database. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Expert-Group. 2017. Monitoring Report on the Implementation of the Priority Reform Action Roadmap (5th July–22nd November 2017). Chisinau: Expert-Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falyakhov, R. 2015. A Union with Barriers. Gazeta.ru, March 18. https://www.gazeta.ru/business/2015/03/17/6602773.shtml. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Felbermayr, G., and J. Groschl. 2017. Free Trade from Lisbon to Vladivostok: Who Gains, Who Loses from a Eurasian Trade Agreement? CESifo Forum 18 (2): 52–62. München: IFO Institut–Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindy, L. 2017. A Rising China Eyes the Middle East. The Century Foundation, April 6, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. 2018. World Economic Outlook, April 2018. Cyclical Upswing, Structural Change. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Trade Center. 2018. International Trade Statistics 2001–2018. Geneva: International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO. http://www.intracen.org/itc/market-info-tools/trade-statistics/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Kaczmarski, M. 2017. Two Ways of Influence-Building: The Eurasian Economic Union and the One Belt, One Road Initiative. Europe-Asia Studies 69 (7): 1027–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofner, J., P. Balas, M. Emerson, P. Havlik, E. Rovenskaya, A. Stepanova, E. Vinokurov, and P. Kabat. 2017. High-level Consultation Meeting on Eurasian Economic Integration. IIASA Project “Challenges and Opportunities of Economic Integration within a Wider European and Eurasian Space”, IIASA Workshop Report. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovziridze, T. 2017. Georgia-China FTA: A Side Effect of the EU-Georgia DCFTA? CEPS Report. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, M. 2017. China is Getting More and More Interested in Ukraine. Central European Financial Observer, June 2, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krakowska, M. 2018. The Dragon in the Room. New Eastern Europe, January 30, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., and R. Pantucci. 2013. Decision Time for Central Asia: Russia or China. Open Democracy, January 24, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liik, K., ed. 2014. Russia’s “Pivot” to Eurasia. London: European Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. Y., Y.K. Tang, X.L. Chen, and J. Poznanska. 2017. The Determinants of Chinese Outward FDI in Countries Along “One Belt One Road”. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 53 (6): 1374–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansurov, T. 2015. Eurasian Economic Integration: Experience and Prospects. Moscow: Russky Raritet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzalevsky, R. 2011. Russian-Led Customs Union Intensifies Sino–Russian Rivalry in Central Asia. Eurasia Daily Monitor 8 (147). https://jamestown.org/program/russian-led-customs-union-intensifies-sino-russian-rivalry-in-central-asia/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Nereim, V. 2018. IMF Raises Saudi Arabia’s 2018 Growth Forecast as Oil Climbs. Bloomberg, January 22, 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-22/saudi-2018-growth-forecast-revised-up-by-imf-as-oil-prices-rise. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Nolte, D. 2010. How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics. Review of International Studies 36 (4): 881–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peel, M., K. Manson, and A. Ward. 2017. Europe Battles to Save Commercial Ties with Iran. Financial Times, October 12, 2017. https://www.ft.com/content/c6166f24-af42-11e7-aab9-abaa44b1e130. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Upadhyay, R. 2017. Iran and Iraq Are Making It Harder for Saudi Arabia to Prop Up Oil Prices. Business Insider, March 13, 2017. http://www.businessinsider.com/iran-and-iraq-ramp-up-oil-production-2017-3?r=US&IR=T&IR=T. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Vinokurov E., P. Balas, M. Emerson, P. Havlik, V. Pereboev, E. Rovenskaya, A. Stepanova, J. Kofner, and P. Kabat. 2016. Challenges and Opportunities of Economic Integration Within a Wider European and Eurasian Space. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlas, C. 2018. EU Almost Equals CIS at Individual Money Transfers to Moldova. Moldova.org, February 20, 2018. http://www.moldova.org/en/2017-eu-almost-equals-cis-individual-money-transfers-moldova/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Wiśniewska, I. 2013. Eurasian Integration. Russia’s Attempt at the Economic Unification of the Post-Soviet Area, OSW Studies Report 44, July 2013. Warsaw: Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolczuk, K., L. Delcour, R. Dragneva, K. Maniokas, and D. Žeruolis. 2017. The Association Agreements as a Dynamic Framework: Between Modernization and Integration, EU-STRAT Working Paper, no. 06. Berlin: EU-STRAT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mirkina, I. (2019). Economic Challenges in Trans-Europe. In: Giusti, S., Mirkina, I. (eds) The EU in a Trans-European Space. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03679-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics