Skip to main content

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Safety-Critical Systems via Guided Simulation for Rare Events

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Verification (ISoLA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11245))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

For developers of assisted or automated driving systems, gaining specific feedback and quantitative figures on the safety impact of the systems under development is crucial. However, obtaining such data from simulation of their design models is a complex and often time-consuming process. Especially when data of interest hinge on extremely rare events, an estimation of potential risks is highly desirable but a non-trivial task lacking easily applicable methods. In this paper we describe how a quantitative statement for a risk estimation involving extremely rare events can be obtained by guiding simulation based on reinforcement learning. The method draws on variance reduction and importance sampling, yet applies different optimization principles than related methods, like the cross-entropy methods against which we compare. Our rationale for optimizing differently is that in quantitative system verification, a sharper upper bound of the confidence interval is of higher relevance than the total width of the confidence interval.

Our application context is deduced from advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) development. In that context virtual driver simulations are performed with the objective to generate quantitative figures for the safety impact in pre-crash situations. In order to clarify the difference of our technique to variance reduction techniques, a comparative evaluation on a simple probabilistic benchmark system is also presented.

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony within the research center Critical Systems Engineering for Sociotechnical Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Like in formal verification we have to assume the model used for simulation is correct.

  2. 2.

    Note that hitherto unseen paths in the tree can arise during simulation due to the probabilistic nature of the model being simulated. Therefore, the set of nodes in the tree grows incrementally.

  3. 3.

    Note that, due to the finite amount of samples used, this is only an approximation.

References

  1. Clopper, C.J., Pearson, E.S.: The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26(4), 404–413 (1934)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Donzé, A., Maler, O.: Robust satisfaction of temporal logic over real-valued signals. In: Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) FORMATS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6246, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15297-9_9

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, no. 57. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission: Towards a European road safety area: policy orientations on road safety 2011–2020 (2010). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0389

  5. Eurostat: Slightly over 26 000 victims of road accidents in the EU in 2015. Eurostat Press Office Vincent (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7734698/7-18112016-BP-EN.pdf

  6. Fränzle, M., Hansen, M.R.: A robust interpretation of duration calculus. In: Van Hung, D., Wirsing, M. (eds.) ICTAC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3722, pp. 257–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11560647_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gietelink, O., De Schutter, B., Verhaegen, M.: Adaptive importance sampling for probabilistic validation of advanced driver assistance systems. In: 2006 American Control Conference, vol. 19, 6 pp. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gietelink, O., De Schutter, B., Verhaegen, M.: Probabilistic validation of advanced driver assistance systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, vol. 19 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jegourel, C., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikučionis, M., Poulsen, D.B., Sedwards, S.: Importance sampling for stochastic timed automata. In: Fränzle, M., Kapur, D., Zhan, N. (eds.) SETTA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9984, pp. 163–178. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47677-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahn, H.: Use of different Monte Carlo sampling techniques, p. 766 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Page, Y., et al.: A comprehensive and harmonized method for assessing the effectiveness of advanced driver assistance systems by virtual simulation: the P.E.A.R.S. initiative. In: The 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). NHTSA, Gothenburg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Puch, S., Wortelen, B., Fränzle, M., Peikenkamp, T.: Using guided simulation to improve a model-based design process of complex human machine systems. In: Modelling and Simulation, ESM 2012, pp. 159–164. EUROSIS-ETI, Essen (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Puch, S., Wortelen, B., Fränzle, M., Peikenkamp, T.: Evaluation of drivers interaction with assistant systems using criticality driven guided simulation. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) DHM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8025, pp. 108–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39173-6_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinstein, R.: The cross-entropy method for combinatorial and continuous optimization. Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 1, 127–190 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vogel, K.: A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accid. Anal. Prev. 35(3), 427–433 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vorndran, I.: Unfallstatistik - Verkehrsmittel im Risikovergleich. DESTATIS (2010). https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/WirtschaftStatistik/Monatsausgaben/WistaDezember10.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

  17. WIVW GmbH: Fahrsimulationssoftware SILAB. https://wivw.de/de/silab

  18. Wortelen, B., Baumann, M., Lüdtke, A.: Dynamic simulation and prediction of drivers’ attention distribution. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 21, 278–294 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wortelen, B., Lüdtke, A., Baumann, M.: Integrated simulation of attention distribution and driving behavior. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling & Simulation, pp. 69–76. BRIMS Society, Ottawa (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zuliani, P., Baier, C., Clarke, E.M.: Rare-event verification for stochastic hybrid systems. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, pp. 217–226. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Stefan Puch or Martin Fränzle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Puch, S., Fränzle, M., Gerwinn, S. (2018). Quantitative Risk Assessment of Safety-Critical Systems via Guided Simulation for Rare Events. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Verification. ISoLA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11245. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03421-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03421-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03420-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03421-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics