Skip to main content

On the Sequential Massart Algorithm for Statistical Model Checking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Verification (ISoLA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11245))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Several schemes have been provided in Statistical Model Checking (SMC) for the estimation of property occurrence based on predefined confidence and absolute or relative error. Simulations might be however costly if many samples are required and the usual algorithms implemented in statistical model checkers tend to be conservative. Bayesian and rare event techniques can be used to reduce the sample size but they can not be applied without prerequisite or knowledge about the system under scrutiny. Recently, sequential algorithms based on Monte Carlo estimations and Massart bounds have been proposed to reduce the sample size while providing guarantees on error bounds which has been shown to outperform alternative frequentist approachesĀ [15]. In this work, we discuss some features regarding the distribution and the optimisation of these algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://itrust.sutd.edu.sg/testbeds/secure-water-treatment-swat/.

  2. 2.

    The Okamoto bound is sometimes called the Chernoff bound in the literature.

  3. 3.

    A journal version with the proofs is currently submittedĀ [14]. The proofs are also available here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317823195_Sequenti-al_Schemes_for_Frequentist_Estimation_of_Properties_in_Statistical_Model_Checking.

References

  1. Agresti, A., Caffo, B.: Simple and effective confidence intervals for proportions and differences of proportions result from adding two successes and two failures. Am. Stat. 54(4), 280ā€“288 (2000)

    MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Ballarini, P., Barbot, B., Duflot, M., Haddad, S., Pekergin, N.: HASL: a new approach for performance evaluation and model checking from concepts to experimentation. Perform. Eval. 90, 53ā€“77 (2015)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Brown, L., Cai, T., DasGupta, A.: Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat. Sci. 16(2), 101ā€“133 (2001)

    MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Chen, Y., Poskitt, C.M., Sun, J.: Learning from mutants: using code mutation to learn and monitor invariants of a cyber-physical system. In: SP, pp. 648ā€“660 (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Chernoff, H.: A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann. Math. Statist. 23(4), 493ā€“507 (1952)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Clopper, C.J., Pearson, E.S.: The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26, 404ā€“413 (1934)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Dagum, P., Karp, R.M., Luby, M., Ross, S.M.: An optimal algorithm for Monte Carlo estimation. SIAM J. Comput. 29(5), 1484ā€“1496 (2000)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikucionis, M., Poulsen, D.B.: Uppaal SMC tutorial. STTT 17(4), 397ā€“415 (2015)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Grosu, R., Peled, D., Ramakrishnan, C.R., Smolka, S.A., Stoller, S.D., Yang, J.: Using statistical model checking for measuring systems. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8803, pp. 223ā€“238. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45231-8_16

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. HĆ©rault, T., Lassaigne, R., Magniette, F., Peyronnet, S.: Approximate probabilistic model checking. In: Steffen, B., Levi, G. (eds.) VMCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 2937, pp. 73ā€“84. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24622-0_8

    ChapterĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Jegourel, C., Legay, A., Sedwards, S.: A platform for high performance statistical model checking ā€“ PLASMA. In: Flanagan, C., Kƶnig, B. (eds.) TACAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7214, pp. 498ā€“503. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28756-5_37

    ChapterĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Jegourel, C., Legay, A., Sedwards, S.: Importance splitting for statistical model checking rare properties. In: Sharygina, N., Veith, H. (eds.) CAV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8044, pp. 576ā€“591. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39799-8_38

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Jegourel, C., Legay, A., Sedwards, S.: Command-based importance sampling for statistical model checking. Theor. Comput. Sci. 649, 1ā€“24 (2016)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Jegourel, C., Sun, J., Dong, J.S.: Sequential schemes for frequentist estimation of properties in statistical model checking (Journal version). Currently submitted

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Jegourel, C., Sun, J., Dong, J.S.: Sequential schemes for frequentist estimation of properties in statistical model checking. In: Bertrand, N., Bortolussi, L. (eds.) QEST 2017. LNCS, vol. 10503, pp. 333ā€“350. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66335-7_23

    ChapterĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Kwiatkowska, M.Z., Norman, G., Parker, D.: PRISM 2.0: a tool for probabilistic model checking. In: QEST, pp. 322ā€“323. IEEE (2004)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Massart, P.: The tight constant in the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality. Ann. Probab. 18, 1269ā€“1283 (1990)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Metropolis, N., Ulam, S.: The Monte Carlo method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 44(247), 335ā€“341 (1949)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Okamoto, M.: Some inequalities relating to the partial sum of binomial probabilities. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 10, 29ā€“35 (1958)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Samuels, M.L., Witmer, J.W.: Statistics for the Life Sciences, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Wald, A.: Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat. 16(2), 117ā€“186 (1945)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Younes, H.: Verification and planning for stochastic processes with asynchronous events. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University (2004)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Zuliani, P., Platzer, A., Clarke, E.M.: Bayesian statistical model checking with application to stateflow/simulink verification. FMSD 43(2), 338ā€“367 (2013)

    MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Prime Ministerā€™s Office, Singapore, under its National Cybersecurity R&D Programme (Award No. NRF2014NCR-NCR001-040) and administered by the National Cybersecurity R&D Directorate.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyrille Jegourel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jegourel, C., Sun, J., Dong, J.S. (2018). On the Sequential Massart Algorithm for Statistical Model Checking. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Verification. ISoLA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11245. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03421-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03421-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03420-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03421-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics