Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electronic Document Interoperability in Transactions Executions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Soft and Hard Computing (ACS 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 889))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

Transaction as a general human activity is always associated with the flow and processing of information. The electronic document is the form of legally binding information which is being exchanged between the transaction parties. Both humans and information systems take part in transaction executions especially in the area of information transfer and processing. Therefore the ease of implementation of services processing electronic forms using standard programming tools is extremely important for electronic support of transactions execution. Also, the meaning of data (information) stored in the electronic form must be unambiguously and uniformly understood by processing parties (humans and systems). Moreover, services supporting electronic documents transfer and processing must be standardised to make them accessible for a large number of transactions and participants. All considered problems are related to the concept of interoperability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Online Etymology Dictionary. https://www.etymonline.com/word/transaction

  2. Wiktionary. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/transact#English

  3. BusinessDictionary. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/transaction.html

  4. Gray, J.: The transaction concept: virtues and limitations. In: Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Very Large Databases, September 1981. Published by Tandem Computers Incorporated (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  5. https://mfiles.pl/pl/index.php/Transakcja

  6. Wawrzyniak, G., El Fray, I.: An electronic document for distributed electronic services. In: Saeed, K., Homenda, W. (eds.) CISIM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9842, pp. 617–630. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45378-1_54

  7. Wawrzyniak, G., El Fray, I.: An electronic document for distributed electronic services. In: Saeed, K., Homenda, W. (eds.) CISIM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10244, pp. 697–708. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45378-1

  8. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transacted

  9. Scholl, H.J., Kubicek, H., Cimander, R.: Interoperability, enterprise architectures, and IT governance in government. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Tan, Y. (eds.) Electronic Government, EGOV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6846. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_29

  10. Council directive 91/250/EC, 14.5.1991 on the legal protection of computer programmes. Official Journal of the European Communities. No L 122, 17.05.91

    Google Scholar 

  11. Institute of electrical and electronics engineers, standard computer dictionary. IEEE Press, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. European public administration network, e-government working group: key principles of an interoperability architecture, Brussels (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. European Telecommunications Standards Institute: achieving technical interoperability– the ETSI approach. ETSI white paper No. 3. By Hans van der Veer (Lucent Technologies) and Anthony Wiles (ETSI), October 2006. http://www.etsi.org/website/document/whitepapers/wp3_iop_final.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2018

  14. ISO/IEC 2382–1:1993 Information Technology – Vocabulary – Part 1: Fundamental Terms, International Organization for Standardization (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Commission of the European Communities: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2003) 567 final – The Role of eGovernment for Europe’s Future, Brussels (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bugajski, J.M., Grossman, R.L., Vejcik, S.: A service oriented architecture supporting data interoperability for payments card processing systems. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) Service-Oriented Computing – ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guédria, W., Chen, D., Naudet, Y.: A maturity model for enterprise interoperability. In: Meersman, R., Herrero, P., Dillon, T. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009 Workshops, OTM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5872. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Method Integrated Team: Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI), Version 1.1: Method Definition Document Members of the Assessment (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nešić, S.: Semantic document model to enhance data and knowledge interoperability. In: Devedžić, V., Gaševic, D. (eds.) Web 2.0 & Semantic Web. Annals of Information Systems, vol. 6. Springer, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/. Accessed 5 June 2018

  21. W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 1: Structures. https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/. Accessed 5 June 2018

  22. W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes. https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/. Accessed 5 June 2018

  23. Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Third Edition), W3C Recommendation 8 December 2009. https://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/

  24. XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core2/

  25. XML Advanced Electronic Signatures (XAdES). https://www.w3.org/TR/XAdES/

  26. ETSI TS 101 903 XAdES version 1.4.2 z 2010-12. https://portal.etsi.org/webapp/WorkProgram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=35243

  27. RFC 5280, Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate revocation List (CRL), IETF 2008, Profite (2008). https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280

  28. RFC 6960, X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol – OCSP,, IETF 2013. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6960

  29. SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer (Second Edition), W3C Recommendation 27 April 2007. https://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part0-20070427/

  30. SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework (Second Edition), W3C Recommendation 27 April 2007. https://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part1-20070427/

  31. SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts (Second Edition), W3C Recommendation 27 April 2007. https://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part2-20070427/

  32. SOAP Version 1.2 Specification Assertions and Test Collection (Second Edition), W3C Recommendation 27 April 2007. https://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-testcollection-20070427/

  33. RFC 5321, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, IETF (2008). https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321

  34. PKCS #11: Cryptographic Token Interface Standard. RSA Laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  35. PKCS #12: Personal Information Exchange Syntax Standard. RSA Laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  36. RFC 4648, The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings, IETF 2006

    Google Scholar 

  37. RFC 7230, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing, IETF (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. XML Path Language (XPath) 3.1, W3C Recommendation 21 March 2017. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-xpath-31-20170321/

  39. RFC 959, File Transfer Protocol (FTP), IETF (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hyla, T., Pejaś, J.: A practical certificate and identity based encryption scheme and related security architecture. In: Saeed, K., Chaki, R., Cortesi, A., Wierzchoń, S. (eds.) CISIM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8104, pp. 190–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

    Gerard Wawrzyniak & Imed El Fray

  2. Faculty of Applied Informatics and Mathematics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

    Imed El Fray

Authors
  1. Gerard Wawrzyniak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Imed El Fray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard Wawrzyniak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

    Jerzy Pejaś

  2. West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin , Szczecin, Poland

    Imed El Fray

  3. West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

    Tomasz Hyla

  4. Polish Academy of Sciences, Systems Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland

    Janusz Kacprzyk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wawrzyniak, G., El Fray, I. (2019). Electronic Document Interoperability in Transactions Executions. In: Pejaś, J., El Fray, I., Hyla, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Advances in Soft and Hard Computing. ACS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 889. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03314-9_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation