Skip to main content

Abstract

One hundred sixty consecutive patients (mean age, 49.9 years) were operated at San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, between September 2010 and April 2018. Mean tumor size was 23.3 mm. One hundred thirty-five patients (84.4%) had completely preserved facial nerve function (HB 1) before surgery; 56 (35%) patients had preoperative serviceable hearing (AAO-HNS classes A/B). Retrosigmoid approach was performed in all the cases except for one, wherein the patient underwent a translabyrinthine approach. The total or near-total (thin capsule residue left on the brainstem) resection rate was obtained in majority of cases. In the last 14 surgical procedures, a flexible endoscope was employed for final check in the IAC. At 6 months after surgery, 149 (93.7%) patients had HB 1 or facial nerve function. Among 56 patients who had serviceable hearing before surgery, 35 retained it, thus yielding a hearing preservation rate of 62.5%. In 63 procedures, diluted topical papaverine was used for improving the blood flow in microvasculature of cranial nerves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93(2):146–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner G, Robertson JH. Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988;97(1):55–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoa M, Drazin D, Hanna G, Schwartz MS, Lekovic GP. The approach to the patient with incidentally diagnosed vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nejo T, Kohno M, Nagata O, Sora S, Sato H. Dorsal displacement of the facial nerve in acoustic neuroma surgery: clinical features and surgical outcomes of 21 consecutive dorsal pattern cases. Neurosurg Rev. 2016;39(2):277–88; discussion 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mastronardi L, Cacciotti G, Roperto R, Di Scipio E, Tonelli MP, Carpineta E. Position and course of facial nerve and postoperative facial nerve results in vestibular schwannoma microsurgery. World Neurosurg. 2016;94:174–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sameshima T, Morita A, Tanikawa R, Fukushima T, Friedman AH, Zenga F, et al. Evaluation of variation in the course of the facial nerve, nerve adhesion to tumors, and postoperative facial palsy in acoustic neuroma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013;74(1):39–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Corrivetti F, Cacciotti G, Scavo CG, Roperto R, Mastronardi L. Flexible endoscopic-assisted microsurgical radical resection of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas by retrosigmoid approach: operative technique. World Neurosurg. 2018;115:229–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mastronardi L, Cacciotti G, Scipio ED, Parziale G, Roperto R, Tonelli MP, et al. Safety and usefulness of flexible hand-held laser fibers in microsurgical removal of acoustic neuromas (vestibular schwannomas). Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;145:35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mastronardi L, Cacciotti G, Roperto R, Tonelli MP, Carpineta E, How I. Do it: the role of flexible hand-held 2μ-thulium laser fiber in microsurgical removal of acoustic neuromas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017;78(4):301–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardoso AC, Fernandes YB, Ramina R, Borges G. Acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma): surgical results on 240 patients operated on dorsal decubitus position. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007;65(3A):605–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roessler K, Krawagna M, Bischoff B, Rampp S, Ganslandt O, Iro H, et al. Improved postoperative facial nerve and hearing function in retrosigmoid vestibular schwannoma surgery significantly associated with semisitting position. World Neurosurg. 2016;87:290–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Samii M, Gerganov V, Samii A. Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(4):527–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the facial nerve–preservation and restitution of function. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(4):684–94; discussion 94–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatagiba MS, Roser F, Hirt B, Ebner FH. The retrosigmoid endoscopic approach for cerebellopontine-angle tumors and microvascular decompression. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6 Suppl):S171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tatagiba M, Roser F, Schuhmann MU, Ebner FH. Vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid transmeatal approach. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(2):421–5; discussion 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang J, Grayeli AB, Barylyak R, Elgarem H. Functional outcome of retrosigmoid approach in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008;128(8):881–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahsan SF, Huq F, Seidman M, Taylor A. Long-term hearing preservation after resection of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(10):1505–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazzoni A, Zanoletti E, Calabrese V. Hearing preservation surgery in acoustic neuroma: long-term results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32(2):98–102.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamizo A, Mori M, Inoue D, Amano T, Mizoguchi M, Yoshimoto K, et al. Long-term hearing outcome after retrosigmoid removal of vestibular schwannoma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53(10):688–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bennett M, Haynes DS. Surgical approaches and complications in the removal of vestibular schwannomas. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2007;40(3):589–609, ix–x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nonaka Y, Fukushima T, Watanabe K, Friedman AH, Sampson JH, Mcelveen JT, et al. Contemporary surgical management of vestibular schwannomas: analysis of complications and lessons learned over the past decade. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2 Suppl Operative):ons103–15; discussion ons15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mastronardi L, Cacciotti G, Caputi F, Roperto R, Tonelli MP, Carpineta E, et al. Underlay hourglass-shaped autologous pericranium duraplasty in “key-hole” retrosigmoid approach surgery: technical report. Surg Neurol Int. 2016;7:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Mastronardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mastronardi, L., Campione, A., Cacciotti, G., Roperto, R., Giacobbo Scavo, C. (2019). Results in a Personal Series of 160 Cases. In: Mastronardi, L., Fukushima, T., Campione, A. (eds) Advances in Vestibular Schwannoma Microneurosurgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03167-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03167-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03166-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03167-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics