Abstract
Classical sociological theory has blinded us to how friendships are formed and developed at work. Theories represent work as an organizational setting which is public and impersonal. Keeping work separate from ‘real life’ friends is a familiar theme in the social sciences. In 1964, Peter Berger argued that people ‘do not live where they work’ and that the things that mattered and made our lives meaningful, like intimacy, identity and personal life, belonged to a separate private part of our world. For some, making friends at work can be difficult, suggesting that sometimes a traditional work culture persists. Classical philosophers describe work friendships as false friends, while sociologists have defined work friends as context-specific. Nevertheless context-specific friends remain capable of achieving intimacy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This study, ‘Narratives of Collegiality: Friendships in Professional Pettings’ (2010), is discussed in Chapter 4. Details of the methodology are included in a footnote.
References
Allan, G. (1979). A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship. London: Allan & Unwin.
Allan, G. (1989). Friendship: Developing A Sociological Perspective. Boulder and San Francisco: Westview Press.
Allan, G. (2008). Flexibility, Friendship and Family. Personal Relationships, 15(1), 1–16.
Berger, P. (1964). The Human Shape of Work: Studies in the Sociology of Occupations. Indiana: Gateway Editions.
Bittman, M. (1986). A Bourgeois Marx? Max Weber’s Theory of Capitalist Society: Reflections on Utility, Rationality and Class Formation. Thesis Eleven, 15(1), 81–91.
Bochner, Arthur P. (1984). The Functions of Human Communicating in Interpersonal Bonding. In C.C. Arnold and J.W. Bowers (Eds.), Handbook of Rhetorical and Communication Theory (pp. 544–621). Boston, London, Sydney, and Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.
Boling, P. (1996). Privacy and the Politics of Intimate Life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bulmer, M. (1986). Neighbours: The Work of Phillip Abrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrier, J. (1999). People Who Can Be Friends: Selves and Social Relationships. In S. Bell and S. Coleman (Eds.), The Anthropology of Friendship (pp. 21–38). Oxford: Berg.
Feld, S., and Carter, W.C. (1998). Foci of Activity as Changing Contexts of Friendship. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 136–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fine, G. (1984). Friendships in the Workplace. In V.J. Derlega and B.A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and Social Interaction (pp. 185–206). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Fischer, C.S. (1982). What Do We Mean by “Friend”? An Inductive Study. Social Networks, 3(4), 287–306.
Gerth, H.H., and Wright Mills, C. (1964). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Trans. H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Goffman, Erving (1963). Behavior in Public Places (Notes on The Social Organization of Gatherings). New York: The Free Press.
Hearn, J., Sheppard, D.L., Tancred-Sheriff, P., and Burrell, G. (Eds.). (1989). The Sexuality of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hill, L., and McCarthy, P. (2004). On Friendship and Necessitudo in Adam Smith. History of the Human Sciences, 17(4), 1–16.
Hinde, R.A. (1979). Towards Understanding Relationships. London: Academic Press.
Lane, R.E. (1992). Work as “Disutility” and Money as “Happiness”: Cultural Origins of a Basic Market Error. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21(1), 43–64.
Morgan, D.H.J. (2009). Acquaintances: The Space Between Intimates and Strangers. Berkshire: Open University Press.
O’Connor, P. (1992). Relationships Between Women. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Orbach, S., and Eichenbaum L. (1994). Between Women: Facing up to Feelings of Love, Envy and Competition in Women’s Friendships. London: Arrow Books.
Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Pedersen, V.B., and Lewis, S. (2012). Flexible Working Time Arrangements, Blurred Work-Life Boundaries and Friendship. Work Employment & Society, 26(3), 264–280.
Pringle, R. (1988). Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power and Work. Sydney: Allan & Unwin.
Pringle, R. (1989). Bureaucracy, Rationality and Sexuality: The Case of Secretaries. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff, and G. Burrell (Eds.), The Sexuality of Organization (pp. 1267–1286). London: Sage.
Rezende, C.B. (1999). Building Affinity Through Friendship. In S. Bell and S. Coleman (Eds.), The Anthropology of Friendship (pp. 79–97). Oxford: Berg.
Silver, A. (1989). Friendship and Trust as Moral Ideals: An Historical Approach. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 30(2), 274–297.
Simmel, G. ([1906] 1950). Secrecy. In K.H. Wolff (Trans., Ed. and Introduction), The Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 330–344). New York: The Free Press.
Spencer, L., and Pahl, R. (2006). Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Strikwerda, R.A., and May, L. (1992). Male Friendship and Intimacy. Hypatia, 7, 110–125.
Stryker, S. (1968). Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Relevance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 30(4), 558–564.
Thomas, L. (1987). Friendship. Synthèse, 72, 217–36.
Turner, Ralph H. (1978). The Role and the Person. American Journal of Sociology, 84 (1), 1–23.
Vernon, M. (2005). Friends at Work. In The Philosophy of Friendship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wallace, R.A., and Wolf, A. (1995). Contemporary Sociological Theory: Continuing the Classical Tradition, 4th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Weintraub, J. (1997). The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction. In J. Weintraub and K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy (pp. 1–42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilkinson, J. (2019). Work Friends: ‘Real Life’ Relationships. In: The Public Life of Friendship . Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03161-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03161-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03160-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03161-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)