Abstract
There is both continuity and change in the challenges facing governance of the contemporary Arctic. Since the inception of the Arctic Council, the Chairs have played a significant role in highlighting or reducing the importance of different variables related to the region’s interlinked social and environmental changes. We argue that many of the current challenges confronting Arctic residents and stakeholders are in fact paradoxes – examples of irresolvable tensions at the top of the world that can be researched and managed, but are unlikely, without a significant unanticipated event, to be resolved. This chapter approaches the challenges faced in the twenty-first century Arctic from a perspective that recognizes the complexity of the agenda-setting that an Arctic Council Chair encounters. In the past 20 years interest in the poles has grown and the conduct of research has evolved, yet there remain disconnects between local, national, and Pan-Arctic actors’ policies and the security and vitality of the region. As more information about Arctic systems - social, ecological, and geophysical – becomes available at ever-faster speeds, the meaning of this information to diverse and competing actors is also evolving. The Arctic Council Chairmanship process has a role in promoting a better fit over time between Arctic Council governance and government policies in the North.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AMAP. (2017). Adaptation actions for a changing Arctic: Perspectives from the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort region. Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP).
Arctic Council. (2013). Arctic resilience interim report 2013. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute and Stockholm Resilience Centre http://www.Arctic-council.org/arr.
Arctic Council. (2016). Arctic resilience assessment, M. Carson and G. Peterson (eds). Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute and Stockholm Resilience Centre http://www.Arctic-council.org/arr.
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dalea, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 995–1004.
Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23.
Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Birkland, T. A. (2006). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Blair, B., Lovecraft, A. L., & Hum, R. (2018). The disaster Chronotope: Spatial and temporal learning in governance of extreme events. In S. Bonati, L. M. Calandra, & G. Forino (Eds.), New trends for governance of risks and disasters: Theory and practice. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Bosso, C. (1994). The contextual bases of problem definition. In D. Rochefort & R. Cobb (Eds.), The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Busenberg, G. (2001). Learning in organizations and public policy. Journal of Public Policy, 21(2), 173–189.
Busenberg, G. (2004). Adaptive policy Design for the Management of wildfire hazards. The American Behavioral Scientist, 48(3), 314–326.
Chapin, F. S., III, Sommerkorn, M., Robards, M. D., & Hillmer-Pegram, K. (2015). Ecosystem stewardship: A resilience framework for arctic conservation. Global Environmental Change, 34, 207–217.
Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(March), 1–25.
Cohen, J., Pfeiffer, K., & Francis, J. A. (2018). Warm Arctic episodes linked with increased frequency of extreme winter weather in the United States. Nature Communications, 9, 869. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02992-9.
Cost, D. S. (2015). The role of public education in governance for resilience in a rapidly changing Arctic. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07757-200329.
Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415(2 January), 23.
Daniel, R., & Behe, C. (2017). Co-production of knowledge: An inuit indigenous knowledge perspective. Abstract #C13H-04 given at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union.
DeRue, S. (2011). Adaptive leadership theory: Leading and following as a complex adaptive process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 125–150.
Dhillon, J. (2017). Prairie rising: Indigenous youth, decolonization, and the politics of intervention. Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 144–161).
Eicken, H., Lovecraft, A. L., & Druckenmiller, M. (2009). Sea-ice system services: A framework to help identify and meet information needs relevant for Arctic observing networks. Arctic, 62, 119–136.
Fazey, I., Fazey, J. A., & Fazey, D. M. A. (2005). Learning more effectively from experience. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 4.
Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Jr., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions ten years later. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 30.
Francis, J., Vavrus, S. J., & Cohen, J. (2017). Amplified Arctic warming and mid-latitude weather: New perspectives on emerging connections. WIREs Climate Change, 8, e474. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.474.
Hiedanpää, J. (2013). Institutional misfits: Law and habits in Finnish wolf policy. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 24.
Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska. (2015). Alaskan Inuit food security conceptual framework: How to assess the Arctic from an Inuit perspective. Technical report. Anchorage: ICC-Alaska. Available online at: www.iccalaska.org.
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.
Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2018). Public policy (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.
Krajick, K., et al. (2007). Race to plumb the frigid depths. Science, 315(5818), 1525–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.315.5818.1525.
Larsen, J. N., & Fondahl, G. (eds). (2015). Arctic human development report : Regional processes and global linkages. Copenhagen. https://doi.org/10.6027/TN2014-567.
Lovecraft, A. L. (2013). The human geography of Arctic Sea ice: Introduction. Polar Geography, 36(1–2), 1–4.
Lovecraft, A. L., & Eicken, H. (Eds.). (2011). North by 2020: Perspectives on Alaska’s changing social-ecological systems. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.
Mahler, J. (1997). Influences of organizational culture on learning in public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 519–540.
Meek, C. L., Lovecraft, A. L., Varjopuro, R., Dowsley, M., & Dale, A. T. (2011). Adaptive governance and the human dimensions of marine mammal management: Implications for policy in a changing north. Marine Policy, 35, 466–476.
Meier, W. N., Hovelsrud, G. K., van Oort, B. E. H., Key, J. R., Kovacs, K. M., Michel, C., Haas, C., Granskog, M. A., Gerland, S., Perovich, D. K., Makshtas, A., & Reist, J. D. (2014). Arctic Sea ice in transformation: A review of recent observed changes and impacts on biology and human activity. Reviews of Geophysics, 52, 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000431.
Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 420–434.
Nilsson, A. E., & Meek, C. L. (2016). Organizational learning in regional governance: A study of the Arctic Council. Stockholm Environmental Institute, Working paper 2016–14, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nuttall, A. D. (2014). Sovereignty, security, and international cooperation. In W. R. Murray & A. D. Nuttall (Eds.), International relations and the Arctic (pp. 599–623). Amherst: Cambria Press.
Palosaari, T. (2012). The amazing race. On resources, conflict, and cooperation in the Arctic. In L. Heininen & R. Rouge-Oikarinen (Eds.), Nordia geographical publications yearbook 2011: Sustainable development in the Arctic region through peace and stability (pp. 13–30).
Pretes, M., & Robinson, M. (1989). Beyond boom and bust: A strategy for sustainable development in the north. Polar Record, 25(153), 115–132.
Robards, M. D., & Lovecraft, A. L. (2010). Evaluating co-management for social-ecological fit: Indigenous priorities and agency mandates for Pacific Walrus. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 257–279.
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Romanovsky, V. E., Isaksen, K., Drozdov, D., et al. (2017). Changing permafrost and its impacts. pp 65–102 in AMAP, 2017. Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA) 2017. Arctic monitoring and assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway.
Sabatier, P. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more. In P. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). The study of public policy processes. In P. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Seidman, E., & Rappaport, J. (Eds.). (1986). Redefining social problems. New York: Plenum Press.
Serreze, M. C., & Stroeve, J. (2015). Arctic sea ice trends, variability and implications for seasonal ice forecasting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 373(2045), 20140159.
Solomon, S., Plattner, G.-K., Knutti, R., & Friedlingstein, P. (2009). Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. PNAS, 106, 1704–1709. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812721106.
Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Pernilla, M., & Spierenburg, M. (2014). Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio, 43(5), 579–591.
Thornton, T. F. (2001). Subsistence in northern communities: Lessons from Alaska. The Northern Review, 23, 82–102.
Trainor, S. F. (2017). Adaptation. In Adaptation actions for a changing Arctic: Perspectives from the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort region. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP): Oslo.
USGCRP. (2017). In D. J. Wuebbles, D. W. Fahey, K. A. Hibbard, D. J. Dokken, B. C. Stewart, & T. K. Maycock (Eds.), Climate science special report: Fourth national climate assessment, Volume I (470 pp). Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program. https://doi.org/10.7930/J0J964J6.
Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Barnosky, A. D., Poirier, C., Gałuszka, A., Cearreta, A., Edgeworth, M., Ellis, E. C., Ellis, M., Jeandel, C., Leinfelder, R., McNeill, J. R., Richter, D., Steffen, W., Syvitski, J., Vidas, D., Wagreich, M., Williams, M., Zhisheng, A., Grinevald, J., Odada, E., Oreskes, N., & Wolfe, A. P. (2016). The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351(6269), 137.
Whitt, L. (2009). Science, colonialism, and indigenous peoples. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wohlforth, C. (2004). The whale and the supercomputer: On the northern front of climate change. New York: North Point Press.
Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Young, O., & Underdal, A. (1997). Institutional dimensions of global change. IHDP Scoping Report. International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Bonn, Germany.
Zellen, B. S. (2009). Arctic doom, Arctic boom: The geopolitics of climate change in the Arctic. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lovecraft, A.L., Cost, D. (2019). Policy Paradoxes: Challenges Confronting the Contemporary Arctic. In: Nord, D. (eds) Leadership for the North. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03107-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03107-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03106-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03107-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)