Skip to main content

Evolutionary Multi Optimization Business Process Designs Using MR-Sort NSGAII

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobile, Secure, and Programmable Networking (MSPN 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 11005))

  • 639 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, a research was carried out on the problem of evolutionary multi objective business process optimization. It does involve (i) to construct feasible business process designs with optimum attributes, and (ii) to classify the obtained solutions using a simple and scientific approach understandable by the decision maker. The business process evolutionary multi objective optimization (BPMOO) approach involves the generation of a series of diverse optimized business process designs for the same process requirements using an evolutionary algorithm (EA). The work presented in this paper is aimed to investigate the benefits that come from the utilization of multiple-criteria decision analysis methods (MCDA) with an evolutionary multi objective optimization algorithms (EMOA) execution process. The experimental results clearly bring that the proposed optimization Framework is capable of producing an acceptable number of optimized design alternatives to simplify the decision maker’s choice of solutions in a reasonable runtime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Coello, C.A.C.: Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 1(1), 28–36 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Pareto, V.: Cours d’Economie Politique, vol. I and II. F. Rouge, Lausanne (1896)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coello, C.A.C., Lamont, G.B., Van Veldhuizen, D.A.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, vol. 5. Springer, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36797-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Goel, T.: Controlled elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms for better convergence. In: Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D. (eds.) EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993, pp. 67–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaffer, J.D.: Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithm. In: 1st International Conference of GA and their Application, pp. 93–100 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mahammed, N., Benslimane, S.M.: Toward multi criteria optimization of business processes design. In: Bellatreche, L., Pastor, Ó., Almendros Jiménez, J.M., Aït-Ameur, Y. (eds.) MEDI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9893, pp. 98–107. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45547-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Goel, T., Vaidyanathan, R., Haftka, R.T., Shyy, W., Queipo, N.V., Tucker, K.: Response surface approximation of pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196(4), 879–893 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofacker, I., Vetschera, R.: Algorithmical approaches to business process design. Comput. Oper. Res. 28(13), 1253–1275 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A., Majeed, B.: Business process improvement using multi-objective optimisation. BT Technol. J. 24(2), 229–235 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vergidis, K., Saxena, D., Tiwari, A.: An evolutionary multi-objective framework for business process optimisation. Appl. Soft Comput. 12(8), 2638–2653 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vergidis, K., Turner, C., Alechnovic, A., Tiwari, A.: An automated optimisation framework for the development of re-configurable business processes: a web services approach. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 28(1), 41–58 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Georgoulakos, K., Vergidis, K., Tsakalidis, G., Samaras, N.: Evolutionary multi-objective optimization of business process designs with pre-processing. In: IEEE Congress on CEC 2017, pp. 897–904. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wibig, M.: Dynamic programming and genetic algorithm for business processes optimisation. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. 5(1), 44 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farsani, S.T., Aboutalebi, M., Motameni, H.: Customizing NSGAII to optimize business processes designs. Res. J. Recent Sci. 2, 74–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahammed, N., Benslimane, S.M.: An evolutionary algorithm based approach for business process multi-criteria optimization. IJOCI 7(2), 34–53 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mahammed, N., Benslimane, S., Hamdani, N.: Evolutionary multi-objective optimization of business process designs with MA-NSGAII. In: Amine, A., Mouhoub, M., Ait Mohamed, O., Djebbar, B. (eds.) CIIA 2018. IAICT, vol. 522, pp. 341–351. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89743-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.A.M.T.: A fast and elitist multi objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T.: An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1), 217–245 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, W.: Aide multicritère à la décision dans le cadre de la problématique du tri: concepts, méthodes et applications, Doctoral dissertation, Paris 9 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roy, B., Bouyssou, D.: Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Economica, Paris (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning the parameters of a non compensatory sorting model. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) ADT 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9346, pp. 153–170. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadir Mahammed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mahammed, N., Benslimane, S.M., Ouldkradda, A., Fahsi, M. (2019). Evolutionary Multi Optimization Business Process Designs Using MR-Sort NSGAII. In: Renault, É., Boumerdassi, S., Bouzefrane, S. (eds) Mobile, Secure, and Programmable Networking. MSPN 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11005. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03101-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03101-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03100-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03101-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics