Abstract
It has been my aim in this book to elaborate a rigorous ontological theory from Arnheim’s writings for its ample benefits in understanding our contemporary medial situation, marked by unprecedented technological dependence and richness. Against the charge of those like Mitchell who argue that insisting on real medial difference “tends…to reduce that knowledge to a set of abstract propositions about the period aesthetic,” I attempted to show in the preceding chapters the way in which a strong ontology of media form is necessary to understand completely – to characterize – the political-economic changes taking place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Barry Smith, “Documents Acts,” in A. Konzelmann-Ziv and H. B. Schmid (eds.), Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents. Contributions to Social Ontology (Dordrecht: Springer, 2014); c.f. “How to Do Things with Documents,” Rivista di Estetica 50 (2012), 179–198.
- 2.
Arnheim, “Art Today and the Film,” 243; Arnheim, “Discipline and Media,” 421.
- 3.
Adriano D’Aloia, “Adamant Bodies. The Avatar-Body and the Problem of Autoempathy. E|C 3 (2009): 51–56.
- 4.
Thomas Fuchs, “The Virtual Other: Empathy in the Age of Virtuality,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (2014): 152–173.
- 5.
Fuchs, “The Virtual Other,” 170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verstegen, I. (2018). Conclusion: Medial Wisdom. In: Arnheim, Gestalt and Media. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02970-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02970-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02969-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02970-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)