Skip to main content

Interpretivism—Valuing the Unfolding Lives and Stories of Young Families

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Respectful Research With and About Young Families

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods ((PSERM))

  • 409 Accesses

Abstract

Storytelling and oral history is embedded in, and a notable part of, the practices and culture of many tribes, and families across generations, and through time. Stories serve a range of purposes, including passing on practices, history, values, and the meanings and interpretations of life events. Valuing the storied lives of young families opens up new research spaces, where the focus becomes one of gaining insights into how families make sense of their social worlds whilst also giving voice and honouring the personal experiences, practices, and environments of others. When families are offered the opportunity to recount and provide narratives about their domestic lives, they draw from an interpretive frame that reflects their understandings of their contexts and the contexts of others in their social world. This chapter focusses more specifically on the value of interpretivism as a lens for seeking to understand young families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alasuutari, M. (2013). Voicing the child? A case study in Finnish early childhood education. Childhood, 21(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. (2016). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez, J. M., Muruthi, B., & Jordan, L. (2016). Decolonizing research methods for family science: Creating space at the centre – Decolonizing research practices. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(2), 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessarab, D., & Ng’andu, B. (2010). Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in indigenous research. Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 3(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, volume 1, theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (2009). South Burnett early movement and stimulation project. Retrieved from Toowoomba, QLD. https://eprints.usq.edu.au/7703/1/Brown_Project_Report_2009_AV.pdf

  • Brown, A. (2012). The new frontier: A social ecological exploration of factors impacting on parental support for the active play of young children within the micro-environment of the family home. PhD, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2012, December 2–6). Respectful, responsible and reciprocal ruralities research: Approaching and positioning educational research differently within Australian rural communities. Paper presented at the Joint International Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the Asia Pacific Educational Research Association (AARE 2012): Regional and Global Cooperation in Educational Research, Sydney, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2017). CHE Principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.13799.

  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushin, N. (2009). Researching family migration decision making: A children-in-families approach. Population, Space and Place, 15(5), 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P., & James, A. (Eds.). (2008). Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed.). Milton Park, Oxon: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, J. (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2001). How to listen to very young children: The Mosaic approach. Child Care in Practice, 7(4), 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2011). Breaking methodological boundaries? Exploring visual, participatory methods with adults and young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., Kjorholt, A. T., & Moss, P. (2005). Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services. Bristol, UK, Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the Mosaic approach. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach (2nd ed.). London: National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, M., & Clandinin, D. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covey, S. (1989). He seven habits of highly effective people: Powerful lessons in person change. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C., & Lightfoot, C. (2004). Theory and craft in narrative inquiry. In C. Daiute & C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society (pp. vii–xviii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies and human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, N. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, N. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, N. (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7(3), 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2011). Researching with young children: Seeking assent. Child Indicators Research, 4(2), 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, T. (2012). A partial promise of voice: Digital Storytelling and the limits of listening. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy: Quarterly journal of media research and resources, 42, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach advanced reflections (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, K. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargas-Malet, M., McSherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C. (2010). Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly, T., Stewart-Withers, R., & Kelly Dombrowski, K. (2014). Being there: Mothering and absence/presence in the field. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, 11(2), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedesco, H. N. (2015). The impact of (In)effective listening on interpersonal interactions. The International Journal of Listening, 29(2), 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, A., Walsh, K., Wong, S., & Cumming, T. (2015). Using strengths-based approaches in early years practice and research. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiese, B. (2013). Family context in early childhood. In O. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (3rd ed., pp. 369–384). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiese, B., & Wamboldt, F. S. (2003). Coherent accounts of coping with a chronic illness: Convergences and divergences in family measurement using a narrative analysis. Family Process, 42(4), 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geia, L. K., Hayes, B., & Usher, K. (2013). Yarning/Aboriginal storytelling: Towards an understanding of an Indigenous perspective and its implications for research practice. Contemporary Nurse, 46(1), 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R., Hodge, K., & McMahon, C. (Eds.). (2017). Children, families and communities (5th ed.). South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C., & Winter, E. (2011). Hearing voices: Participatory research with preschool children with and without disabilities. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An Introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. (2003). Analysing interpretive practice. In N. Denzin & N. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 214–248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J., Holstein, J., Marvasti, A., & McKinney, K. (2012). The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, R., & Toombs, M. (2013). Culture, identity and indigenous Australian people. In R. Hampton & M. Toombs (Eds.), Indigenous Australians and health: The wombat in the room (pp. 3–23). South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancox, D. (2011). Stories with impact: The potential of storytelling to contribute to cultural research and social inclusion. The Journal of Media and Culture, 14(6). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/439

  • Harcourt, D., & Einarsdóttir, J. (2011). Introducing children’s perspectives and participation in research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, D., Perry, B., & Waller, T. (2011). Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harden, J., Backett-Milburn, K., Hill, M., & MacLean, A. (2010). Oh, what a tangled web we weave: Experiences of doing ‘multiple perspectives’ research in families. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(5), 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. (2010). A cry to teach for social justice: Linking early childhood education, participatory action research and children’s literature. Toowoomba, QLD: University of Southern Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, F. S., Pasqua, A., Marquez, C. A., & Geishirt-Cantrell, B. (2002). Utilizing traditional storytelling to promote wellness in American Indian communities. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(1), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (2015). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kansteiner, K. (2002). Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies. History & Theory, 41(2), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, M. (2010). Rethinking children and research: Attitudes in contemporary society. London: Continuum International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, L. J. (2015). Strengthening family coping resources: Intervention for families impacted by trauma. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, L. J., Baumgardner, B., & Dorado, J. (2010). Who are we, but for the stories we tell: Family stories and healing. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 2(3), 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacha, M. (2010). Conversational method in indigenous research. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 5(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2005). Can you hear me? The right of young children to participate in decisions affecting them (Working papers in early childhood development, no. 36). ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., Murphy, L., & Lee, C. K. (2008). Influences and emotions: Exploring family decision-making processes when buying a house. Housing Studies, 23(2), 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1988). Criteria for assessing naturalistic inquiries as reports. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, April 5–9, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohoar, S., Butera, N., & Kennedy, E. (2014). Strengths of Australian Aboriginal cultural practices in family life and child rearing. Retrieved from https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/sites/default/files/publication-documents/cfca25.pdf

  • Lunn, J., & Moscuazz, A. (2014). Doing it together: Ethical dimensions of accompanied fieldwork In J. Lunn (Ed.), Fieldwork in the global south: Ethical challenges and dilemmas (pp. 69–82). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J. (2015). Creating an ‘architecture of listening’ in organizations: The basis of engagement, trust, healthy democracy, social equity, and business sustainability. Retrieved from Sydney, NSW. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/fass-organizational-listening-report.pdf

  • MacNaughton, G. (2005). Doing Foucault in early childhood studies: Applying post-structural ideas. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malaguzzi, L. (1993). History, ideas, and basic philosophy: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach – Advanced reflections (2nd ed.). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why “listening to children” and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 405–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCashen, W. (2005). The strengths approach. Bendigo, VIC: St. Luke’s Innovative Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHale, S., Booth, A., & Amato, P. (Eds.). (2014). Emerging methods in family research. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, J. H. (2001). Coming of age: Rethinking the role of children in population studies. International Journal of Population Geography, 7(6), 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTavish, M., Streelasky, J., & Coles, L. (2012). Listening to children’s voices: Children as participants in research. International Journal of Early Childhood, 44(3), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S., & Tisdall, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2015). Peeling the onion: Understanding others’ lived experience. Contemporary Nurse, 50(2–3), 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. (2011). Understanding children and childhood (Centre for Children and Young People background briefing series, no. 1). Retrieved from Lismore: https://studylib.net/doc/8773920/understanding-children-and-childhood

  • Morrow, V., & Richards, M. (1996). The ethics of social research with children: An overview. Children and Society, 10(2), 90–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Petre, P. (2005). From children’s services to children’s spaces: Public policy, children and childhood. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaiologou, I. (2014). ‘Do we hear what children want to say?’ Ethical praxis when choosing research tools with children under five. Early Child Development and Care, 184(5), 689–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, D. (2011). ‘A friend who understand fully’: Notes on humanizing research in a multiethnic youth community. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, D., & Winn, M. (Eds.). (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, C., & Bertram, T. (2009). Listening to young citizens: The struggle to make real a participatory paradigm in research with young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(2), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrino, S. (2011). Chronotopes of story and storytelling event in interviews. Language in Society, 40(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podesta, J. (2013). Listening to children’s voices: Child-centred participatory research tools for sociologists. Retrieved from https://www.tasa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Podesta.pdf

  • Pole, C., Mizen, P., & Bolton, A. (1999). Realising children’s agency in research: Partners and participants? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2000). Children’s participation: control and self-realisation in British late modernity. Children and Society, 14(4), 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching, and learning. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, C. (2013). Carla Rinaldi: Re-imagining childhood. Adelaide thinker in residence series. Retrieved from http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/aboutdept/files/links/reimagining_childhood.pdf

  • Saleebey, D. (2012). The strengths perspective in social work practice (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandri, R. A. (2013). Weaving the past into the present: Indigenous stories of education across generations. Doctor of Philosophy PhD, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemperlen, D. (2000). Our lady of the lost and found. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, S., & Torrance, H. (2005). Case study. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 33–40). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (1987). Conceptual strategies of environmental psychology. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 41–70). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2012). ‘Looking and listening-in’: A methodological approach to generating insights into infants’ experiences of early childhood education and care settings. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(3), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (2014). Honouring the oral traditions of my ancestors through storytelling. In S. Strega & L. Brown (Eds.), Research as resistance: Revisiting critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches to research (2nd ed., pp. 177–198). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved from New York. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf

  • Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, M. (Ed.). (2013). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, D. (2004). Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: Reflections on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations. Qualitative Health Research, 14(4), 578–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D., & Fraga, L. (2011). Coming together around military families. In D. Osofsky (Ed.), Clinical work with traumatized young children (pp. 172–197). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. M., & Cumming, T. (2008). Practice grounded in theory: The theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of SDN’s Child, Family and Children’s Services Programs. The second of eight reports investigating SDN’s Child, Family and Children’s Services Program. Retrieved from Sydney, NSW. http://www.academia.edu/836851/Practice_Grounded_in_Theory

  • Woodhead, M. (2006). Changing perspectives on early childhood: Theory, research and policy: A background paper the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2007: Strong foundations: Early childhood care and education – Changing perspectives. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147499e.pdf

  • Woodhead, M., & Faulkner, D. (2008). Subjects, objects or participants? Dilemmas on psychological research with children. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 10–39). Milton Park, Oxon: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunkaporta, T., & Kirby, M. (2011). Yarning up Aboriginal pedagogies: A dialogue about eight Aboriginal ways of learning. In N. Purdie, G. Milgate, & H. R. Bell (Eds.), Two way teaching and learning: Toward culturally reflective and relevant education (pp. 205–213). Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Brown .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brown, A. (2019). Interpretivism—Valuing the Unfolding Lives and Stories of Young Families. In: Respectful Research With and About Young Families. Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02716-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02716-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02715-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02716-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics