Abstract
Despite its known inadequacies, notice and consent is still the most common privacy practice on social media platforms. Indeed, conceptualizing alternative privacy strategies for the social media context has proven to be difficult. In 2009, Facebook implemented a participatory governance system that enabled users to vote on its privacy policy. However, three years later, Facebook held a final vote that led to the termination of its participatory governance system. Here, we empirically assess this participatory privacy strategy designed to democratize social media policy-making. We describe the different components of Facebook’s participatory governance system, show how users could influence privacy policy decision-making, and report the privacy policies users accepted and rejected by vote. Furthermore, we identify the common themes users discussed during the final electoral period by applying an unsupervised machine learning topic modeling algorithm to thousands of Facebook user comments. Our results demonstrate that users voiced concerns about being insufficiently informed about participation commitments and possibilities, attempted to orchestrate a transfer of the vote to a third-party platform, and engaged in spreading misconstrued data ownership claims. Based on our results, we analyze the key reasons behind Facebook’s failure to implement a successful participation process. Finally, we highlight the significance of framing diversity for privacy decision-making in the context of a participatory privacy strategy on social media.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
CNN: Mark Zuckerberg in his own words: The CNN interview. http://money.cnn.com/2018/03/21/technology/mark-zuckerberg-cnn-interview-transcript. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Lazer, D., et al.: The science of fake news. Science 359(6380), 1094–1096 (2018)
Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31(2), 211–236 (2017)
The Atlantic: What took Facebook so long? https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/03/facebook-cambridge-analytica/555866/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Pu, Y., Grossklags, J.: Valuating friends’ privacy: does anonymity of sharing personal data matter? In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 339–355 (2017)
Stieger, S., Burger, C., Bohn, M., Voracek, M.: Who commits virtual identity suicide? Differences in privacy concerns, internet addiction, and personality between Facebook users and quitters. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 16(9), 629–634 (2013)
Cate, F., Mayer-Schönberger, V.: Notice and consent in a world of big data. Int. Data Priv. Law 3(2), 67–73 (2013)
Langheinrich, M.: Privacy by design—Principles of privacy-aware ubiquitous systems. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) UbiComp 2001. LNCS, vol. 2201, pp. 273–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45427-6_23
Gürses, S., del Alamo, J.M.: Privacy engineering: shaping an emerging field of research and practice. IEEE Secur. Priv. 14(2), 240–246 (2016)
Good, N., et al.: Stopping spyware at the gate: a user study of privacy, notice and spyware. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 43–52 (2005)
Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J.: Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Secur. Priv. 3(1), 26–33 (2005)
Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., Berendt, B.: E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 38–47 (2001)
Gindin, S.: Nobody reads your privacy policy or online contract: lessons learned and questions raised by the FTC’s action against Sears. Northwest. J. Technol. Intellect. Prop. 8(1), 1–37 (2009)
Keith, M., Maynes, C., Lowry, P., Babb, J.: Privacy fatigue: the effect of privacy control complexity on consumer electronic information disclosure. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (2014)
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., Loewenstein, G.: Misplaced confidences: privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 4(3), 340–347 (2013)
Bösch, C., Erb, B., Kargl, F., Kopp, H., Pfattheicher, S.: Tales from the dark side: privacy dark strategies and privacy dark patterns. Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. 4, 237–254 (2016)
Nochenson, A., Grossklags, J.: An online experiment on consumers’ susceptibility to fall for post-transaction marketing scams. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (2014)
Spiekermann, S., Cranor, L.F.: Engineering privacy. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(1), 67–82 (2009)
Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook/next-steps-on-facebook-governance/70896562130/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Buzzfeed: Facebook democracy is dead. https://www.buzzfeed.com/mattbuchanan/facebook-democracy-is-dead?. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
CNN: The end of digital democracy? Facebook wants to take away your right to vote. https://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/22/tech/social-media/facebook-democracy. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/terms.php. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
The Guardian: Facebook privacy change angers campaigners. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/dec/10/facebook-privacy. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
PCWorld: Facebook’s Zuckerberg to Address User Privacy Concerns at Press Conference Thursday. https://www.pcworld.com/article/160304/facebook.html. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/fbsitegovernance/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Facebook Newsroom. https://newsroom.fb.com/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Adweek: Facebook’s proposed revisions to statement of rights and responsibilities, data use policy up for vote through June 8. http://www.adweek.com/digital/site-governance-vote/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Letter of the Electronic Privacy Information Center. https://epic.org/privacy/facebook/EPIC-CDD-Ltr-to-FB-Data-Use.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Facebook Newsroom: Our Site Governance Vote. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2012/12/our-site-governance-vote/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Facebook: Results of the Inaugural Facebook Site Governance Vote. https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook/results-of-the-inaugural-facebook-site-governance-vote/79146552130/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
CNN: Voting closes on Facebook policy changes, only 299 million votes short. https://edition.cnn.com/2012/12/10/tech/social-media/facebook-policy-vote/index.html. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Aizawa, A.: An information-theoretic perspective of TFIDF measures. Inf. Process. Manag. 39(1), 45–65 (2003)
Blei, D., Lafferty, J.: Topic models. In: Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications, pp. 71–93 (2009)
Lee, D., Seung, S.: Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401(6755), 788–791 (1999)
Franc, V., Hlaváč, V., Navara, M.: Sequential coordinate-wise algorithm for the non-negative least squares problem. In: Gagalowicz, A., Philips, W. (eds.) CAIP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3691, pp. 407–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11556121_50
Cao, J., Xia, T., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Tang, S.: A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection. Neurocomputing 72(7–9), 1775–1778 (2009)
Our Policy, 7000 Comments for a better Privacy Policy. http://web.archive.org/web/20120617192456/, http://www.our-policy.org:80/html/en.html. Accessed 21 May 2018
Süddeutsche Zeitung: Nein, man kann den neuen Datenschutz-Regeln nicht per Facebook-Bild widersprechen. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/eu-verordnung-nein-man-kann-den-neuen-datenschutz-regeln-nicht-per-facebook-bild-widersprechen-1.3984780. Accessed 18 May 2018
New York Times: A guide to (somewhat) painless thanksgiving travel. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/travel/thanksgiving-travel-tips.html. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Bond, R., et al.: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415), 295–298 (2012)
Facebook newsroom: proposed updates to our governing documents. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2012/11/proposed-updates-to-our-governing-documents/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
Wired: The case for a Zuck-free Facebook. https://www.wired.com/story/the-case-for-a-zuck-free-facebook/. Accessed 21 May 2018
Estlund, D.: Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)
Adjerid, I., Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., Loewenstein, G.: Sleights of privacy: framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (2013)
Kelly, J.T.: Framing democracy: a behavioral approach to democratic theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)
Sniderman, P.M., Theriault, S.M.: The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In: Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, pp. 133–165 (2004)
Brewer, P., Gross, K.: Values, framing, and citizens’ thoughts about policy issues: effects on content and quantity. Polit. Psychol. 26(6), 929–948 (2005)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Kathryn E. Lambert and Alan Nochenson for their contributions to data collection and preliminary analysis of the data. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments. The research activities of Severin Engelmann and Jens Grossklags are supported by the German Institute for Trust and Safety on the Internet (DIVSI).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Engelmann, S., Grossklags, J., Papakyriakopoulos, O. (2018). A Democracy Called Facebook? Participation as a Privacy Strategy on Social Media. In: Medina, M., Mitrakas, A., Rannenberg, K., Schweighofer, E., Tsouroulas, N. (eds) Privacy Technologies and Policy. APF 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11079. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02547-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02547-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02546-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02547-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)