Abstract
Anti-counterfeiting enforcement, as an important means of supervising product quality in China, plays a vital role in safeguarding and improving the quality of products. Over recent years, however, the emergence of new consumer goods is shadowed by fake or inferior products that come up one after another. Do the anti-counterfeiting actions carried out by the government really play a part in the maintenance of market order and the improvement of product quality? These problems have attracted more and more attention of consumers and enterprises. In this paper, a random sampling method is employed to select two research objects across the country: consumers and enterprises. A logistic regression model is applied to the evaluation of anti-counterfeiting effectiveness towards enterprises and consumers. It is found that about 45.9% of consumers are satisfied with anti-counterfeiting enforcement, and about 45.1% of the enterprises are pleased with anti-counterfeiting actions, suggesting that anti-counterfeiting enforcement needs strengthening. Moreover, there is a long way to go before anti-counterfeiting work satisfies companies and consumers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
M. Hao, Research on anti-counterfeit enforcement governance of product quality. J. Guangxi Univers. 6 (2016)
M. Chen, S.X. Tong, X. Youquan, Z. Boyi, Quality Supervision Bureau, Qingpu District, Shanghai: Practice and thinking on network anti-counterfeit enforcement. China Qual. Tech. Super. 10 (2015)
Y. Tengfei, H. Maqin, Thinking on the issues of “Large Numbers of Fakes” and “Hard Anti-counterfeit” from the perspective of economics. Contemp. Eco. 4 (2013)
Z. Zhu, Differences between domestic anti-counterfeit and international anti-counterfeit. Qual. Standard. 12 (2016)
Z. Huijun, Exploration on the issues of professional anti-counterfeit. Qual. Stand. 3 (2017)
S. Jingjing, Combating against the “Latent Rules” of Fake Products – “Sword of Quality Control” Typical Case of Anti-counterfeit Special Action announced by AQSIQ in 2016, China Quality Technical Supervision 2016/12 (2016)
B. Qianwen, Z. Chunyan, Static comparison and dynamic analysis of the hazards of fake and forged products. J. Shandong Inst. Bus. Technol. 3 (2016)
B. Zheng, Explanation on the difficulties of governing the Fake and Shoddy Phenomenon in China Based on Game Theory. Modern Econ. Inf. 11 (2016)
Q. Jinhua, L. Kai, On the current professional anti-counterfeit phenomenon and response. China Bus. Admin. Res. 7 (2014)
Q. Ruoying, Current situation and countermeasures analysis of rural fake and Shoddy goods market. Enterprise Technol. Dev. 9 (2016)
Z. Zhu, Differences between domestic and foreign anti-counterfeit. Qual. Standard. 12 (2016)
L. Jinchun, Why do fake and shoddy goods appear endlessly - Economic thinking of anti-counterfeit measures. Modern Econ. Inf. 4 (2014)
Z.A. Collier, S. Walters, D. DiMase, et al., A semi-quantitative risk assessment standard for counterfeit electronics detection. SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 7(1), 171–181 (2014)
S.H. Ang, P.S. Cheng, et al., Spot the difference: Consumer responses towards counterfeits. J. Consum. Mark. 18(3), 219–235 (2001)
V.V. Cordell, R.L. Kieschnick, et al., Counterfeit purchase intentions: role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. J. Bus. Res. 35, 41–53 (1996)
Tan, Understanding consumer ethical decision making with respect to purchase of pirated software. J. Consum. Mark. 19, 96–111 (2002)
S. John, Cracking down on counterfeit parts. Assembly 59(7), 69–77 (2016)
A. Chia, L.S. Mee, The effects of issue characteristics on the recognition of moral issues. J. Bus. Ethics 27(3), 255–269 (2000)
J. Kujala, A multidimensional approach to Finnish managers’ moral decision-making. J. Bus. Ethics 34, 231–254 (2001)
T.W. Dunfee, N. Craig Smith, W.T. Ross Jr., Social contracts and marketing ethics. J. Mark. 63(3), 14–32 (1999)
D. DiMase, Z.A. Collier, J. Carlson, R.B. Traceability and risk analysis strategies for addressing counterfeit electronics in supply chains for complex systems. Risk Anal. 36(10), 1834–1843 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12536
D. Jin, Y. Qing, Y. Lihua, A Study of Moral Decisions on Consumer Purchasing Counterfeit Product Behavior. 2011 International Conference on Computer Science and Service System, CSSS 2011. pp. 2937–2942
Acknowledgments
This paper has been funded by the national key research and development project “Research on key technical standards for quality and safety control of consumer goods” (2016YFF02022600), and the central basic research business project “Research on method for consumer product safety risk assessment based on the simulation technology—taking children’s products as an example” (552015Y-3990), and the project “Development of general chemical safety standard for 10 consumer products” (201510203).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xia, L., Wanjin, T., Bisong, L., Ya, L., Qian, W., Tiezhong, L. (2019). Logistic Model-Based Evaluation of Anti-counterfeiting Effectiveness for Consumer Goods: Based on Cognition of Companies and Consumers. In: Reyes-Munoz, A., Zheng, P., Crawford, D., Callaghan, V. (eds) EAI International Conference on Technology, Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Education. TIE 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 532. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02242-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02242-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02241-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02242-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)