Skip to main content

Special Agricultural Safeguards in the International Trade of Meat Analysis and Impacts on the Brazilian Economy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Time Series Data Methods in Applied Economic Research (ICOAE 2018)

Abstract

This study identified the impact of special agricultural safeguards (SSG) for the global market of meat and for the Brazilian economy. The tariff lines (TLs) subject to SSG were selected and the period of analysis was 1995 (when the rules about the SSGs were established) to 2015 (more recent period for which there are notifications). The value of additional tariff was calculated for each of the most important TLs in Brazilian export value and together with the price elasticities for imports, was used to estimate the impacts on imports. Finally, the effect of an increase in Brazilian exports of meat without SSG taxes was calculated as well as its impact in the country’s economy by using an input-output matrix for Brazil. The most important markets that applied SSGs to Brazilian exports were the US for beef and European Union for poultry. However, the additional tariffs could be estimated in only two of the sixteen years that the US applied SSGs on beef imports, suggesting that its use has been enforced when the average annual price has been lower than the trigger price level. Therefore, with the additional tariffs that could be estimated, the results indicated that the impact of the value of the meat that could not be exported to both markets EU and US, due to SSGs was equivalent to BRL 3.7 billion of the economy’s production value (at 2015 prices) and almost BRL 2 billion of the Brazilian GDP.

The content of this publication expresses the views of this author and does not necessarily represent the views of the OECD or its member countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The data from China correspond to the sum of the values of Hong Kong, Continental China, Macao and Taiwan.

  2. 2.

    The derivative of this eq. can be found in Orcutt (1950).

  3. 3.

    The difference between y and Y is a value and Y is a vector-type matrix where, in the line corresponding to the meats sector that was not exported by the country, the value y found is included.

  4. 4.

    In the period analyzed (1995–2015) these tariff lines underwent some transformations. Therefore: the LT 02071210 was 02072110; the LT 02071290 was 02072190; the LT 02071410 was 02074110; the LT 02071450 was 02074151; the LT 02071460 was 02074171; the LT 02071470 was 02074171; the tariff line 02072510 was 02072210; the LT 02072710 was 02073931 and; the LT 02073615 was 02074515 and also 02074315.

  5. 5.

    Japan, despite not having a tariff quota for pork meat, submitted a volume SSG usage notification for this product in 1997. This data was not estimated and stands as a mere observation in this study.

References

  • Aznal, M. (2007). Special products and special safeguard mechanism in WTO agriculture negotiation. Briefing Paper, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil. (2018). Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística—IBGE. Available at: https://ww2.ibge.gov.br/home/. Download. Statistics. National Accounts Accessed in: 2018.

  • Costa, C. C., Burnquist, H. L., & Guilhoto, J. J. M. (2015). Special safeguard tariff impacts on the Brazilian sugar exports. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 14(2), 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat—European Commission. (2018). International Trade. Data. Database. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/international_trade/data/database. Access: 2018.

  • FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2002). FAO papers on selected issues relating to the WTO negotiations on agriculture. Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018a). FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/home/en. Statistics. Databases. Data. Food Balance. Commodity balances—livestock and fish primary equivalent.

  • FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018b). FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/home/en. Statistics. Databases. Data. Trade. Crops and livestock products.

  • FAPRI—Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute. (2018). Tools. Elasticities database. Available at: http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/. Access: January 20, 2018.

  • Finger, J. M. (2009). A special safeguard mechanism for agricultural imports and the management of reform. World Bank: Policy Research Working Paper, n. 4927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilhoto, J. J. M., & Sesso Filho, U. A. (2010). Estimation of the input-output matrix using preliminary data from national accounts: application and analysis of economic indicators for Brazil in 2005. Economy & Technology UFPR/TECPAR. Year 6 (Vol. 23) October/December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. (2008). Special safeguards and agricultural trade liberalization. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Australian Government. Publication no. 08/125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. W., Martin, W., Leister, A. M. (2010). Potential implications of a special safeguard mechanism in the World Trade Organization: The case of wheat. World Bank Economic Review, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD-FAO. (2015). Agricultural outlook 2015–2024. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4738e.pdf. Access: 2015.

  • Orcutt, G. H. (1950). Measurement of price elasticities in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 32(2), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, P., & Wadhwa, D. (2006). An analysis of the special safeguard mechanisms in the Doha Round of Negotiations. ICRIER Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. Working Paper, n. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2018). Comtrade Database. Available at: https://comtrade.un.org/. Get Data. Extract data. Accessed in: 2018.

  • USITC—United States International Trade Commission. (2018). Trade DataWeb. Available at: http://dataweb.usitc.gov. Access: 2018.

  • Wolfe, R. (2009). The special safeguard fiasco in the WTO: The perils of inadequate analysis and negotiation. World Trade Review, 8(4), 517–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WTO—World Trade Organization. (2018a). Available at: https://www.wto.org/ Document, data and resources. Documents Online search facility. Accessed in: 2018a.

  • WTO—World Trade Organization. (2018b). Available at: https://www.wto.org/ Document, data and resources. Statistics. Tariffs. Tariff Analysis Online Access in: 2018b.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cinthia Cabral da Costa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

da Costa, C.C., Burnquist, H.L., Guilhoto, J.J.M. (2018). Special Agricultural Safeguards in the International Trade of Meat Analysis and Impacts on the Brazilian Economy. In: Tsounis, N., Vlachvei, A. (eds) Advances in Time Series Data Methods in Applied Economic Research. ICOAE 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02194-8_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics