Skip to main content

Dilemmas in Performance-Based Budgeting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performance-Based Budgeting in the Public Sector

Part of the book series: Governance and Public Management ((GPM))

Abstract

The central theme of this book concerns the many dilemmas and paradoxes of performance-based budgeting. The modern concept of performance-based budgeting is by now at least 70 years old and this poses the question, whether the limited results achieved might provide an indication that it has reached a phase in its life-cycle that it has become time for its retirement. This book argues the opposite. This book contains case studies from many countries in the world—including most developed countries, but with a focus on countries in transitional, developmental conditions, where implementation failures often limit the success of realized reforms, and where the dilemmas surrounding performance-based budgeting might be extremely prominent. In-depth evaluation of real cases serves as an important learning tool both for the academic and professional field. Implementation mistakes can perhaps not be prevented, but as international experiences show, can be resolved—the book may help in this way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, and Richard M. Walker. 2006. Subjective and Objective Measures of Organizational Performance: An Empirical Exploration. In Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, ed. George A. Boyne, Meier Kenneth, Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., and Richard M. Walker, 14–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511488511.002.

  • Behn, Robert D. 1994. The Wrong Way to Motivate. Governing 8: 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst, Rick, Christiaan Lako, and Michiel S. de Vries. 2014. Is Performance Measurement Applicable in the Public Sector? A Comparative Study of Attitudes Among Dutch Officials. International Journal of Public Administration 37 (13): 922–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.944988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breul, Jonathan. 2007. GPRA—A Foundation for Performance Budgeting. Public Performance & Management Review 30 (3): 312–331. https://doi.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576300301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusca, Isabel, Eugenio Caperchione, Sandra Cohen, and Francesca Manes-Rossi. 2018. IPSAS, EPSAS and Other Challenges in European Public Sector Accounting and Auditing. In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, ed. Edoardo Ongaro and Sandra van Thiel, 165–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullis, John, and Philip Jones. 2009. Public Finance and Public Choice: Analytical Perspectives, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kruijf, Johan A. M., and Michiel S. de Vries. 2018. Contextualizing the Trend from Output to Outcome Measurement: The Dutch Pension System. Public Money & Management 38 (1): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1389544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, Janet V., and Robert B. Denhardt. 2007. The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering, Expanded ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. 1957. An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. World Politics 9 (3): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/2008920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, Cynthia, and Natasha Palmer. 2009. Performance-Based Payment: Some Reflections on the Discourse, Evidence and Unanswered Questions. Health Policy and Planning 24 (3): 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, Samuel E. 1997. The History of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1975. Interview with Richard Heffner on The Open Mind (7 December 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, John B., and David E. Lewis. 2006. Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget’s PART Scores. Public Administration Review 66 (5): 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00639.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. 1991. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Meagan M., and Merl M. Hackbart. 1999. Performance Budgeting and Performance Funding in the States: A States Assessment. Public Budgeting Finance 19 (1): 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0275-1100.1999.01157.x.

  • Ladd, Helen F. 2002. School Vouchers: A Critical View. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (4): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002320950957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1936. The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2084615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Donald P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Donald P., and Ivor Beazley. 2016. Toward Next-Generation Performance Budgeting: Lessons from the Experiences of Seven Reforming Countries. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0954-5.

  • Nemec, Juraj, and Michiel S. de Vries. 2012. Public Sector Dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2005. Modernising Government: The Way Forward. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2007. Performance Budgeting in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2008. Performance Budgeting: A User’s Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2014. Budgeting Practices and Procedures in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1965 [2009]. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, Marek, and Michiel S. de Vries. 2014. The Voucher System as an Alternative for Allocating Sports Grants. Central European Journal of Public Policy 8 (2): 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Marc. 2002. Financial Control in Australian Government Budgeting. Public Budgeting & Finance 22 (1): 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00067.

  • Robinson, Marc, ed. 2007. Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Marc, and Jim Brumby. 2005. Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Analytical Review of the Empirical Literature. IMF Working Papers 5 (210), International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451862294.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saliterer, Iris, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini. 2018. Public Budgets and Budgeting in Europe: State of the Art and Future Challenges. In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, ed. Ongaro Edoardo and Sandra van Thiel, 141–163. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, Allen. 2003. The Performing State. OECD Journal on Budgeting 3 (2): 71–103. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v3-art10-en.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick, Allen. 2008. Getting Performance Budgeting to Perform. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, Allen. 2014. The Metamorphoses of Performance Budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting 13 (2): 49–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Graham. 2010. Performance-Informed Budgeting: Experiences and Opportunities. In Results, Performance Budgeting and Trust in Government, ed. Arizti Pedro, Jim Brumby, Nick Manning, Roby Senderowitsch, and Theo Thomas, 31–40. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serban, Andreea M., and Joseph C. Burke. 1998. Meeting the Performance Funding Challenge: A Nine-State Comparative Analysis. Public Productivity & Management Review 22 (2): 157–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Peter. 1995. On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Administration 18 (2–3): 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699508525011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarschys, Daniel. 2002. Time Horizons in Budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting 2 (2): 77–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, Wouter, and Cornelia Hoffmann. 2018. Performance Management in Europe: An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone. In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, ed. Edoardo Ongaro and Sandra van Thiel, 207–226. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, Wouter, Geert Bouckaert, and John Halligan. 2010. Performance Management in the Public Sector. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Thiel, Sandra, and Frans L. Leeuw. 2002. The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector. Public Performance & Management Review 25 (3): 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1964 [2015]. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, Katherine, and Paul Benson. 2011. Program Evaluation, Performance Budgeting and PART: The US Federal Government Experience. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2010. Results, Performance Budgeting and Trust in Government. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michiel S. de Vries .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Vries, M.S., Nemec, J. (2019). Dilemmas in Performance-Based Budgeting. In: de Vries, M.S., Nemec, J., Ĺ paÄŤek, D. (eds) Performance-Based Budgeting in the Public Sector. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02077-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics