Abstract
The main objective of this chapter is to conduct a cross-platform analysis and identify disclosure patterns in three different social media platforms: Badoo, CouchSurfing, and Facebook. Drawing on Hogan’s (2010) exhibitionistic approach, in this chapter, user profiles are analysed as cultural artefacts, which are tools for self-(re)presentation and impression management. The observation of user profiles is combined with the interviews with participants where they explained which topics they disclosed online and considered intimate. After a definition of the concepts of self-disclosure and self-(re)presentation, the topics that participants frequently identified as intimate when interacting through social media (relationship status, sexual orientation, political and religious beliefs, sex, alcohol intake, and feelings) are discussed in depth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Bi-curious: (Of a heterosexual person) interested in having a sexual experience with a person of the same sex (Oxford English Dictionary, 2018a).
- 2.
It is also common practice for couples who live together to create a common CouchSurfing profile because they are both actually hosting other members.
References
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Archer, R. L., & Burleson, J. A. (1980). The effects of timing of self-disclosure on attraction and reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 120–130.
Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(February), 573–590.
Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connection in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Berger, J. (1982). Appearances. In J. Berger & J. Mohr (Eds.), Another way of telling (pp. 81–129). New York: Vintage Books.
Brake, D. R. (2014). Sharing our lives online: Risks and exposure in social media. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cohen, J. E. (2012). Configuring the networked self: Law, code, and the play of everyday practice. New Have: Yale University Press.
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Steinfield, C., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2011). Negotiation privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspective on privacy and self-disclosure on the social web (pp. 19–32). New York: Springer.
Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane.
Hjorth, L., Wilken, R., & Gu, K. (2012). Ambient intimacy: A case study of the iPhone, presence, and location based social media in Shanghai, China. In L. Hjorth, J. Burgess, & I. Richardson (Eds.), Studying mobile media: Cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone (pp. 43–62). New York: Routledge.
Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 30(6), 377–386.
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jiang, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Absence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. The Journal of Communication, 63(3), 556–577.
Joinson, A. N., Houghton, D. J., Vasalou, A., & Marder, B. L. (2011). Digital crowding: Privacy, self-disclosure, and technology. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 33–45). Heidelberg: Springer.
Jordán-Conde, Z., Mennecke, B., & Townsend, A. (2013). Late adolescent identity definition and intimate disclosure on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 356–366.
Köhl, M. M., & Götzenbrucker, G. (2014). Networked technologies as emotional resources? Exploring emerging emotional cultures on social network sites such as Facebook and Hi5: A trans-cultural study. Media, Culture & Society, 36(4), 508–525.
Lambert, A. (2013). Intimacy and friendship on Facebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lara, T. (2007). El currículum posmoderno en la cultura. Zemos98.org. [Online]. Available from: http://equipo.zemos98.org/El-curriculum-posmoderno-en-la. Accessed 14 May 2014.
Lasén, A. (2013). Digital inscriptions and loss of embarrassment: Some thoughts about the technological mediations of affectivity. Intervalla, 1, 85–100.
Lomborg, S. (2013). Social media, social genres: Making sense of the ordinary. New York: Routledge.
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately. Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
Mendelson, A., & Papacharissi, Z. (2010). Look at us: Collective narcissism in college student Facebook photo galleries. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 251–273). New York: Routledge.
Miguel, C. (2016). Visual intimacy on social media: From selfies to the co-construction of intimacies through shared pictures. Social Media + Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641705.
Miller, D. (2011). Tales from Facebook. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(2), 103–111.
Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: University Press.
Park, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S. A. (2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1974–1983.
Pedroni, M., Pasquali, F., & Carlo, S. (2014). My friends are my audience: Mass-mediation of personal content and relations in Facebook. Observatorio (OBS*), 8(3), 97–113.
Qiu, L., Lin, H., Leung, A. K., & Tov, W. (2012). Putting their best foot forward: Emotional disclosure on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(10), 569–572.
Reichelt, L. (2007, March 1). ‘Ambient intimacy’. Disambiguity. http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 367–389). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Sprecher, S., Treger, S., Wondra, J. D., Hilaire, N., & Wallpe, K. (2013). Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 860–866.
Thompson, C. (2008, September 15). Brave new world of digital intimacy. New York Times Magazine. [Online]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html. Accessed 5 June 2012.
Thumim, N. (2012). Self representation and digital culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45(April), 1–10.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.
Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communications and relationship. In M. Knapp & J. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miguel, C. (2018). Intimacies of Digital Identity. In: Personal Relationships and Intimacy in the Age of Social Media. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02062-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02062-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02061-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02062-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)