Skip to main content
  • 1404 Accesses

Abstract

The main objective of this chapter is to conduct a cross-platform analysis and identify disclosure patterns in three different social media platforms: Badoo, CouchSurfing, and Facebook. Drawing on Hogan’s (2010) exhibitionistic approach, in this chapter, user profiles are analysed as cultural artefacts, which are tools for self-(re)presentation and impression management. The observation of user profiles is combined with the interviews with participants where they explained which topics they disclosed online and considered intimate. After a definition of the concepts of self-disclosure and self-(re)presentation, the topics that participants frequently identified as intimate when interacting through social media (relationship status, sexual orientation, political and religious beliefs, sex, alcohol intake, and feelings) are discussed in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bi-curious: (Of a heterosexual person) interested in having a sexual experience with a person of the same sex (Oxford English Dictionary, 2018a).

  2. 2.

    It is also common practice for couples who live together to create a common CouchSurfing profile because they are both actually hosting other members.

References

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R. L., & Burleson, J. A. (1980). The effects of timing of self-disclosure on attraction and reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(February), 573–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connection in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1982). Appearances. In J. Berger & J. Mohr (Eds.), Another way of telling (pp. 81–129). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brake, D. R. (2014). Sharing our lives online: Risks and exposure in social media. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E. (2012). Configuring the networked self: Law, code, and the play of everyday practice. New Have: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Steinfield, C., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2011). Negotiation privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspective on privacy and self-disclosure on the social web (pp. 19–32). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, L., Wilken, R., & Gu, K. (2012). Ambient intimacy: A case study of the iPhone, presence, and location based social media in Shanghai, China. In L. Hjorth, J. Burgess, & I. Richardson (Eds.), Studying mobile media: Cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone (pp. 43–62). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 30(6), 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Absence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. The Journal of Communication, 63(3), 556–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N., Houghton, D. J., Vasalou, A., & Marder, B. L. (2011). Digital crowding: Privacy, self-disclosure, and technology. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 33–45). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jordán-Conde, Z., Mennecke, B., & Townsend, A. (2013). Late adolescent identity definition and intimate disclosure on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhl, M. M., & Götzenbrucker, G. (2014). Networked technologies as emotional resources? Exploring emerging emotional cultures on social network sites such as Facebook and Hi5: A trans-cultural study. Media, Culture & Society, 36(4), 508–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A. (2013). Intimacy and friendship on Facebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lara, T. (2007). El currículum posmoderno en la cultura. Zemos98.org. [Online]. Available from: http://equipo.zemos98.org/El-curriculum-posmoderno-en-la. Accessed 14 May 2014.

  • Lasén, A. (2013). Digital inscriptions and loss of embarrassment: Some thoughts about the technological mediations of affectivity. Intervalla, 1, 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, S. (2013). Social media, social genres: Making sense of the ordinary. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately. Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, A., & Papacharissi, Z. (2010). Look at us: Collective narcissism in college student Facebook photo galleries. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 251–273). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, C. (2016). Visual intimacy on social media: From selfies to the co-construction of intimacies through shared pictures. Social Media + Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2011). Tales from Facebook. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(2), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S. A. (2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1974–1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, M., Pasquali, F., & Carlo, S. (2014). My friends are my audience: Mass-mediation of personal content and relations in Facebook. Observatorio (OBS*), 8(3), 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, L., Lin, H., Leung, A. K., & Tov, W. (2012). Putting their best foot forward: Emotional disclosure on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(10), 569–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, L. (2007, March 1). ‘Ambient intimacy’. Disambiguity. http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.

  • Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 367–389). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Treger, S., Wondra, J. D., Hilaire, N., & Wallpe, K. (2013). Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 860–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2008, September 15). Brave new world of digital intimacy. New York Times Magazine. [Online]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html. Accessed 5 June 2012.

  • Thumim, N. (2012). Self representation and digital culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45(April), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communications and relationship. In M. Knapp & J. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miguel, C. (2018). Intimacies of Digital Identity. In: Personal Relationships and Intimacy in the Age of Social Media. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02062-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics