Skip to main content

Designing Randomized Clinical Trials in Dermatologic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology
  • 1360 Accesses

Abstract

There are many ways to better understand how to diagnose and treat our patients. An unusually powerful tool is the randomized controlled trial (RCT). The first well-reported RCT assessed utility of streptomycin for the treatment of tuberculosis in 1948 (Williams, How to critically appraise a randomized controlled trial. In: Williams H, Bigby M, Herxheimer A, Naldi L, Rzany B, Dellavale R, Ran Y, Furue E (eds) Evidence-based dermatology, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 39–45, 2014). Although a relatively newcomer to the scientific toolbox, the blinded RCT is now widely acknowledged as the key building block that underpins high-level medical evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Williams HC. How to critically appraise a randomized controlled trial. In: Williams H, Bigby M, Herxheimer A, Naldi L, Rzany B, Dellavale R, Ran Y, Furue E, editors. Evidence-based dermatology. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2014. p. 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alam M. Evidence based procedural dermatology. In: Maibach HI, Gorouhi F, editors. Evidence based dermatology. 2nd ed. Shelton: PMPH-USA; 2012. p. 539–45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Alam M, Barzilai DA, Wrone DA. Confidence intervals in procedural dermatology: an intuitive approach to interpreting data. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(4):462–6. PubMed PMID: 15871325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alam M, Barzilai DA, Wrone DA. Power and sample size of therapeutic trials in procedural dermatology: how many patients are enough? Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(2):201–5. Review. PubMed PMID: 15762215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee EH, Klassen AF, Lawson JL, Cano SJ, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Patient experiences and outcomes following facial skin cancer surgery: a qualitative study. Australas J Dermatol. 2016;57(3):e100–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12323. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Erratum in: Australas J Dermatol. 2017;58(2):160. PubMed PMID: 25833383; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5461874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alam M. Usefulness of Cochrane intervention reviews for the practicing dermatologic surgeon. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(9):1345–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12231. Epub 2013 May 2. PubMed PMID: 23638961.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. COMET Initiative [Internet]. COMET Initiative; c2011–2018 [cited 2018 Mar 22]. Available from: http://www.comet-initiative.org/

  8. Core Outcomes Set Initiative [Internet]. Cochrane Skin Group- Core Outcomes Set Initiative; c2018 [cited 2018 Mar 22]. Available from: http://skin.cochrane.org/core-outcomes-set-initiative-csg-cousin

  9. Measurement of Priority Outcome Variables in Dermatologic Surgery [Internet]. IMPROVED Group; c2016 [cited 2018 Mar 22]. Available from: http://www.improvedgroup.org/

  10. Schlessinger DI, Iyengar S, Yanes AF, Lazaroff JM, Godinez-Puig V, Chen BR, Kurta AO, Henley JK, Chiren SG, Furlan KC, Schmitt J, Deckert S, Poon E, Sobanko JF, Cartee TV, Alam M, Maher IA. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in basal cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey. Trials. 2017;18(1):490. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2244-5. PubMed PMID: 29061190; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5654122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlessinger DI, Iyengar S, Yanes AF, Henley JK, Ashchyan HJ, Kurta AO, Patel PM, Sheikh UA, Franklin MJ, Hanna CC, Chen BR, Chiren SG, Schmitt J, Deckert S, Furlan KC, Poon E, Maher IA, Cartee TV, Sobanko JF, Alam M. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in facial aging: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey. Trials. 2017;18(1):359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2104-3. PubMed PMID: 28764734; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5540562.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlessinger DI, Iyengar S, Yanes AF, Chiren SG, Godinez-Puig V, Chen BR, Kurta AO, Schmitt J, Deckert S, Furlan KC, Poon E, Cartee TV, Maher IA, Alam M, Sobanko JF. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey. Trials. 2017;18(1):321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2069-2. PubMed PMID: 28701207; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5506611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869. PubMed PMID: 20332511; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2844943.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332. PubMed PMID: 20332509; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2844940.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Alam M, Rauf M, Ali S, Patel P, Schlessinger DI, Schaeffer MR, Yoo SS, Minkis K, Jiang SI, Maher IA, Sobanko JF, Cartee TV, Poon E. A systematic review of completeness of reporting in randomized controlled trials in dermatologic surgery: adherence to CONSORT 2010 recommendations. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(12):1325–34. Review. PubMed PMID: 27879522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alam M, Rauf M, Ali S, Nodzenski M, Minkis K. A systematic review of reporting in randomized controlled trials in dermatologic surgery: Jadad scores, power analysis, and sample size determination. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(12):1299–305. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000166. Review. PubMed PMID: 25357168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murad Alam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alam, M. (2019). Designing Randomized Clinical Trials in Dermatologic Surgery. In: Alam, M. (eds) Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02023-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02023-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02022-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02023-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics