Skip to main content

Hountondji’s Critique of Ethnophilosophy and His Notion of African Philosophy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paulin Hountondji

Part of the book series: Global Political Thinkers ((GPT))

  • 447 Accesses

Abstract

Paulin Hountondji became famous for his rigorous critique of ethnophilosophy. This chapter presents the historical context of the emergence of ethnophilosophy, portrays the most important writings of this genre and discusses Hountondji’s methodological objections to the ethnophilosophical approach. In his account, Hountondji defends a strict notion of what philosophy should consists of in distinction to other disciplines, spells out what African philosophy must aim at and how it should be set in opposition to mythological thinking. Based on these standards, he critically assesses both Négritude and African socialism as influential intellectual currents on the African continent. By way of conclusion, the chapter illustrates Hountondji’s notion of African philosophy by presenting the oeuvre of the eighteens century philosopher of African descent, Anton Wilhelm Amo, and Hountondji’s reception thereof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A term used for designating the “evolved” or “civilized” subjects in the colonies, who had received a European education , adapted to the metropole’s customs, and formed the new elite of the native population, often employed in skilled professions.

  2. 2.

    Cf. also Eboussi-Boulaga, who makes a similar argument in his article “Le Bantou problématique” (1968, p. 23).

  3. 3.

    Tempels still might have responded that he distinguishes between the thought of the Bantu, who have an “authentic” African mindset, and the évolués , who are alienated, and who diverged from the cultural framework of the Bantu world-view. The objection would, of course, come from the latter (cf. Tempels 1969, pp. 27ff.).

  4. 4.

    In contrast to Hountondji and Diagne , Mudimbe stresses the “universalist dimension in Kagame’s philosophy” (Mudimbe 1988, p. 151). He sets Kagame’s Bantu philosophy apart from Tempels’s position: Although the former stresses the cultural linguistic roots of Bantu philosophy , it must not be understood as an absolute alterity. Rather, Kagame underscores that formal logics are shared by all human fellows and that reasoning makes philosophy a universal discipline (ibid.).

  5. 5.

    Hountondji cites the following passage by Césaire : “[t]hen I turned towards paradises lost to him and his kin, calmer than the face of a women who lies” (Césaire 1995, p. 73).

  6. 6.

    The circumstances and date of Amo’s death are unknown. He returned to Ghana in 1747. There is little evidence concerning his life back in Africa.

References

  • Abraham, W. E. (2004). Anton Wilhelm Amo. In K. Wiredu (Ed.), A Companion to African Philosophy (pp. 191–199). Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (2005 [1965]). For Marx. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (2009 [1965]). Reading Capital. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostel, L. (1981). African Philosophy: Myth or Reality? Ghent: Story-Scientia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, A. (1993). In My Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, A. (1992). ‘Que Faire?’ Reconsidering Inventions of Africa. Critical Inquiry, 19(1), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodunrin, P. (1981). The Question of African Philosophy. Philosophy, 56(216), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Césaire, A. (1995 [1956]). Notebook of a Return to My Native Land (M. Roselle & A. Pritchard, Trans.). Newcastle: Bloodaxe Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Césaire, A. (2000 [1972]). Discourse on Colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1984 [1972]). Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2017 [1976]). Grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diagne, S. B. (2016). The Ink of the Scholar. Dakar: Codesria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eboué, F. (1945). La nouvelle politique indigène pour l’A.E.F. Paris: Office français d’Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eboussi-Boulaga, F. (1968). La Bantou problématique. Présence Africaine, 66, 4–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekondy, A. (1983). Le Congo-Brazzavillle: Essai d’analyse et d’explication sociologique selon la méthode pluraliste. Frankfurt a.M., New York and Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griaule, M. (1965). Conversations with Ogotemmeli: An Introduction to Dogon Religious Ideas. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2011). Lectures on the Philosophy of History: Volume I: Manuscripts of the Introduction and the Lectures of 1822–1823. Hegel Lectures: Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1970). African Wisdom and Modern Philosophy. In T. Lundback (Ed.), African Humanism—Scandinavian Culture: A Dialogue (pp. 183–193). Copenhagen: Danish International Development Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1971). Le problème actuel de la philosophie Africaine. In R. Klibansky (Ed.), La philosophie contemporaine: chronique (pp. 613–621). Tome IV. Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1972). Le mythe de la philosophie spontanée. Cahiers philosophiques africains, 1, 107–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1973). Pluralism, True and False. Diogenes, 94, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1982). Langues Africaines et philosophie: L’hypothèse relativiste. In A. Diemer (Ed.), Africa and the Problem of Its Identity (pp. 75–88). Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1983). Reason and Tradition. In O. Odera & D. A. Masolo (Eds.), Philosophy and Cultures: Proceedings of the 2nd Afro-Asian Philosophy Conference (Nairobi, Oct.–6 Nov. 1981) (pp. 132–147). Nairobi: Bookwise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1987). What Philosophy Can Do. Quest: Philosophical Discussions, 1(2), 2–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1989). Occidentalism, Elitism: Answers to Two Critiques. Quest: Philosophical Discussions, 3(2), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1990). Pour une sociologie des représentations collectives. In Y. Preiswerk & J. Vallet (Eds.), La pensée métisse: Croyances africaines et rationalité occidentale en questions (pp. 187–192). Cahiers de l’IUED. Genf: Presses universitaires de France. https://www.persee.fr/doc/hom0439-4216_1993_num_33_125_369592.

  • Hountondji, P. J. (2000). La fin du monde: Césaire et l’invention de la liberté. In A. Thebia-Melsan (Ed.), Aimé Césaire: pour regarder le siècle en face (pp. 128–153). Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (2009). Knowledge of Africa, Knowledge by Africans: Two Perspectives on African Studies. RCCS Annual Review, 1. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.174.

  • Husserl, E. (1965 [1911]). Philosophy as a Strict Science. In E. Husserl (Ed.), Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy (Q. Lauer, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagame, A. (1956). La philosophy băntu-rwandaise de l’Être. Brussels: Académie royale des Sciences coloniales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1999 [1781]). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaoze, S. (1979). La Psychologie des Bantu et quelques lettres (1907–1911). Kinshasa: Faculté de Théologie Catholique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatibi, A. (1983). Maghreb pluriel. Paris: Denoel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy-Bruhl, L. (2018 [1923]). Primitive Mentality. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1969). Theses on Feuerbach. In Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels (Eds.), Selected Works (pp. 13–15). Moskow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-colonial Freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudimbe, V. E. (1988). The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkrumah, K. (2005 [1964]). Consciencism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntumba, T. (1979). Die Philosophie in der aktuellen Situation Afrikas. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 33(3), 428–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oruka, H. O. (1990). Sage Philosophy: Indigenous Thinkers and Modern Debate on African Philosophy. Amsterdam: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osha, S. (2011). Postethnophilosophy. New York/Amsterdam: Rudopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Reybrouck, D. (2015). Congo: The Epic History of a People. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sénghor, L. (1964). Liberté I. Négritude et humanisme. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempels, P. (1959 [1945]). La Philosophie bantoue. Elizabethville: Lovania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempels, P. (1969 [1959]). Bantu Philosophy. Paris: Présence Africaine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towa, M. (1971). Essai sur la problématique dans l’Afrique actuelle. Yaoundé: Edition CLE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiredu, K. (1996). Cultural Universals and Particulars: An African Perspective. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiredu, K. (1997 [1976]). How Not to Compare African Traditional Thought with Western Thought. Transition, 75/76, 320–327.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Dübgen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dübgen, F., Skupien, S. (2019). Hountondji’s Critique of Ethnophilosophy and His Notion of African Philosophy. In: Paulin Hountondji. Global Political Thinkers. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01995-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics