Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discussion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Does Digital Transformation of Government Lead to Enhanced Citizens’ Trust and Confidence in Government?

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 409 Accesses

Abstract

Over the years, citizens’ trust and confidence in their governments has continued to decline and digital government is expected to reverse this trend. An enormous amount of money has been spent worldwide, on electronic government initiatives that are focused on improving performance, reducing costs and enhancing citizens' trust and confidence in their governments. Yet, of the many initiatives that have been implemented, very few have achieved real transformation of government (i.e. fundamental changes to the way core functions of government are performed to achieve noticeable gains in performance and efficiency). As such, there is a need to understand how transformation of government as a construct affects citizens’ trust and confidence in government in the presence of factors such as, government performance and citizen satisfaction. This research empirically investigates the influence of digital transformation of government on citizens’ trust and confidence in the context of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Bahrain is a top ranking country in terms of use of ICT in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. A conceptual model was developed and validated using an online survey targeting randomly citizens of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Based on 313 responses, the findings of this research suggest that citizens' trust and confidence in their government is positively influenced by transformation of government, mediated by government performance and citizens’ satisfaction. The study found that e-government and technology are not enough for achieving a real transformation of government, and therefore, in tackling the decline in citizens’ trust and confidence in government. Other factors were found to be important in this equation, including transparency and accountability of government functions and activities in meeting citizens' expectations. The research offer multiple policy implications and theoretical contributions, in addition to helping understand how digital transformation of government can enhance citizens' trust and confidence in government, improve government-to-citizen relationship, and increase the adoption of digital services offered by governments. From a policy perspective, this research offers a validated conceptual model that can be used as a frame of reference when planning ICT-enabled transformation projects in government. From a theoretical context, this study is the first to investigate the relationship between transformation of government and citizens' trust and confidence in government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu-Shanab E, Al-Azzam A (2012) Trust dimensions and the adoption of e-government in Jordan. Int J Inf Commun Technol Hum Dev (IJICTHD) 4(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Rub S (2006) The impact of information technology on business performance management. The study of the Affairs Agency of Sudanese working abroad for the period (2000–2005). Master’s Thesis, University of Science and Technology, Omdurman, Sudan

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsaeed A, Adams C, Boakes R (2014) Challenges to the successful implementation of e-government initiatives in middle-east arabic countries and syria: literature review. In tGov workshop 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shafi S, Weerakkody V (2008) The use of wireless internet parks to facilitate adoption and diffusion of e-government services: an empirical study in Qatar. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings, 322

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sobhi F, Weerakkody V, Kamal MM (2010) An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: case of Saudi Arabia. Transforming government. People, Process and Policy 4(1):14–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthopoulos L, Reddick CG, Giannakidou I, Mavridis N (2016) Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Gov Inf Q 33(1):161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister F, Connolly R (2011) Trust and transformational government: a proposed framework for research. Gov. Inf Q 28(2):137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S (2004) E-government and developing countries: an overview. Int Rev Law, Comput & Technol 18(1):109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean C (2015) Changing citizen confidence: orientations towards political and social institutions in Australia, 1983–2010. The Open Polit Sci J 8(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger F, Carter L (2008) Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J Strateg Inf Syst 17(2):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy C, Taylor J (1998) Governing in the information age. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK; Bristol, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham LB (2010) Online deliberation and the United States open government initiative. Online Deliberation, 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham G, Seifert J, Thorson S (2001) The transformational potential of e-government: the role of political leadership. In 4th Pan European international relations conference, 8–11 September, 2001. University of Kent, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert G, Van de Walle S, Kampen JK (2005) Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. Int Rev Admin Sci 71(2):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D (1999) Information systems for improved performance management: development approaches in US public agency. In: Heeks R (ed) Reinventing government in the information age. Routledge, New York, pp 321–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter L, Bélanger F (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf Syst J 15(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen KC, Wei KC, Chen Z (2003) Disclosure, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital: evidence from Asia’s emerging markets. Corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital: evidence from Asia’s emerging markets. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.422000

  • Choi H, Park MJ, Rho JJ, Zo H (2016) Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design–reality gap: applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system. Telecommun Policy 40(7):644–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colesca SE (2009) Understanding trust in e-government. Inzinerine Ekon-Eng Econ 3(3):7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton RJ (2005) The social transformation of trust in government. Int Rev Sociol 15(1):133–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Aundhe M, Das Aundhe M, Narasimhan R, Narasimhan R (2016) Public private partnership (PPP) outcomes in e-government–a social capital explanation. Int J Public Sector Manag 29(7):638–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fine Licht J (2011) Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy. Scand Polit Stud 34(3), 183–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M (2015) The trust deficit—concepts and causes of low public trust in governments. Committee of Experts on Public Administration, Fourteenth session, 20–24 April 2015, Item 3 of the provisional agenda

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountain J (2001) Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC7

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham M, Avery EJ (2013) Government public relations and social media: an analysis of the perceptions and trends of social media use at the local government level. Public Relat J 7(4):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Owen DL, Maunders K (1987) Corporate social reporting: accounting and accountability. Hemel Hempstead, Herts, Prentice-Hall International

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmelikhuijsen S (2009) Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust? Inf Polity 14(3):173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmelikhuijsen Stephan G (2012) A good man but a bad wizard: about the limits and future of transparency of democratic governments. Inf Polity 17(3–4):293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmelikhuijsen S, Porumbescu G, Hong B, Im T (2013) The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment. Public Adm Rev 73(4):575–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawong P, Gao P (2017) Understanding e-government failure in the developing country context: a process-oriented study. Inf Technol Dev 23(1):153–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Babin BJ, Black WC (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, vol 7. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameed S, Al-Shawabkah A (2013) Role of e-government in improving organizational performance in the civil status and passports department of Jordan. Developing Country Stud 3(5):50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna N (2009) e-Transformation: enabling new development strategies. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood Christopher (2006) Beyond exchanging first principles? some closing comments. In: Hood Christopher, Heald David (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 211–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huse M (2005) Accountability and creating accountability: a framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. Br J Manag 16(s1):S65–S79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (2015) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2015. International Labour Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (2016) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2016. International Labour Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (2017) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2017. International Labour Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • ISEA (1999) Accountability 1000. Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kim HJ, Lee H (2009) An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: the case of OPEN. Gov Inf Q 26(1):42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeal R, Hale K, Dotterweich L (2008) Citizen–government interaction and the Internet: expectations and accomplishments in contact, quality, and trust. J Inf Technol & Polit 5(2):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon MJ, Norris DF (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Inf Syst J 15(1):43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FV, Petrescu C (2011) Do they all perform alike? An examination of perceived performance, citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal agencies. Int Rev Admin Sci 77(3):451–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FV, VanAmburg D, Mithas S (2011) Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. J Public Adm Res Theor 21(2):257–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhoryanova OA, Novikova IV, Rudich SB, Bogushevich EV (2016) E-government in the Western European Countries, Asia and in the USA. Indian J Sci Technol 9(16)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam T (2012) Citizens’ attitudes toward open government and government 2.0. Int Rev Admin Sci 78(2):346–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete C (2010) Trust in e-government transactional services: a study of citizens’ perceptions in Mexico and the US. In 43rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), 2010. IEEE, pp. 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Norquist G (2007) Transparency: the new democracy. Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/cms/s/2/2206f20c-45c9-11dc-b359-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1CiOFLwDp

  • Northrup TA, Thorson SJ (2003) The web of governance and democratic accountability. Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill Onora (2002) A question of trust: the BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Office Cabinet (2005) Transformational government. Cabinet Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar A, Weerakkody V, Sivarajah U (2017) Digitally enabled service transformation in UK public sector: a case analysis of universal credit. Int J Inf Manage 37(4):350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pina V, Torres L, Royo S (2009) E-government evolution in EU local governments: a comparative perspective. Online Inf Rev 33(6):1137–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts Alasdair (2006) Governmental adaptation to transparency rules. In: Hood Christopher, Heald David (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 107–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS (1991) Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. Meas Pers Soc Psychol Attitudes 1(3):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Roztocki N, Weistroffer HR (2016) Conceptualizing and researching the adoption of ICT and the impact on socioeconomic development. Inf Technol Dev 22(4):541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehli H, Cooper V, Sarkar P (2016) The role of culture in developing the e-government absorptive capacity of agencies in Saudi Arabia: a conceptual model. PACIS 2016 Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert JW, Chung J (2009) Using e-government to reinforce government—citizen relationships: comparing government reform in the United States and China. Soc Sci Comput Rev 27(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran U (2000) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-building Approach. John Willey & Sons, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Song C, Lee J (2013) Can social media restore citizen trust in government? Public Manag Res Conf. Madison, WI, pp 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SC, Teo TS (2009) Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: insights from young adults in Singapore. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub D, Boudreau MC, Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 13:380–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo TS, Srivastava SC, Jiang L (2008) Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. J Manag Inf Syst 25(3):99–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert CJ, Mossberger K (2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Adm Rev 66(3):354–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2012) E-government survey 2012: e-government for the people. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2014) E-government survey 2014: e-government for the future we want. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2016) E-government survey 2016: e-government in Support of Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle S, Bouckaert G (2003) Public service performance and trust in government: the problem of causality. Int J Public Adm 26(8–9):891–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle S, Van Roosbroek S, Bouckaert G (2008) Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline? Int Rev Admin Sci 74(1):47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller P, Weerakkody V (2016) Digital government: overcoming the systemic failure of transformation. Working Paper 2. Brunel University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shafi S, Weerakkody, V. (2010) ‘Factors affecting e-government adoption in the state of Qatar’, Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 12–13 April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody V, Janssen M, Dwivedi Y (eds) (2009) Handbook of research on ICT enabled transformational government: a global perspective. Inf Sci Ref, Hershey, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J Public Adm Res Theor 15(3):371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West DM (2004) E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64(1):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PF (1987) The legitimate concern with fairness. Acc Organ Soc 12(2):169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2017) Digital governance projects database. Available at https://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/dg-projects-database

  • Zwahr T, Finger M, Müller P (2005) More than digitisation-the transformative potential of e-governance: an exploratory case study. In Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2005, HICSS’05. IEEE, pp 127–127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brunel Business School, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, London, UK

    Mohamed Mahmood

Authors
  1. Mohamed Mahmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Mahmood .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahmood, M. (2019). Discussion. In: Does Digital Transformation of Government Lead to Enhanced Citizens’ Trust and Confidence in Government?. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01759-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation