Skip to main content

An Experimental Study to Compare Two Soil Improvement Techniques Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Geo-Environmental Engineering, Geomechanics and Geotechnics, and Geohazards (CAJG 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation ((ASTI))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1420 Accesses

Abstract

The main purposes of the present study were to compare in situ performances of two ground improvement techniques, which are jet grout and deep soil mixing techniques. In this study, Manisa State Hospital Project location was selected as the test site, because this location has difficult geological and geotechnical conditions. In the test site, three jet grout colons and three deep soil mix colons having same cement content were constructed. After 28 days of curing time, the core specimens were extracted for the uniaxial compressive testing, and lump specimens were collected for further tests and analyses such as X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy and determination of physical properties. The results of the uniaxial compression tests show that the uniaxial compressive strengths of the specimens extracted from the deep soil mix colons are drastically higher than those of the jet grout colons. Additionally, to understand the causes of this difference, several features of the improved soil were investigated by various mineralogical and petrographic methods. According to the results of these investigations, the fabric and some mineralogical properties were seriously affected by the improvement technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wong, I.H., Poh, T.Y.: Effects of jet grouting on adjacent ground and structures. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126(3), 247–256 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coulter, S., Martin, C.D.: Effect of jet-grouting on surface settlements above the Aeschertunnel, Switzerland. Tunnell. Underground Space Technol. 21(5), 542–553 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen, S.L., Wang, Z.F., Horpibulsuk, S., Kim, Y.H.: Jet grouting with a newly developed technology: the twin-jet method. Eng. Geol. 152(1), 87–95 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce, D.A., Bruce, M.E.C., DiMillio, A.F.: Deep mixing method: a global perspective. Civ. Eng. 68(12), 38 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Silva, M.S., O’Riordan, N.J., Parry, L.N.: Trials for the construction of a cement solidified retaining structure in a domestic landfill site using deep soil mixing. Eng. Geol. 60(1), 49–60 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Candan Gokceoglu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Baskose, Y., Gokceoglu, C. (2019). An Experimental Study to Compare Two Soil Improvement Techniques Performance. In: Kallel, A., et al. Recent Advances in Geo-Environmental Engineering, Geomechanics and Geotechnics, and Geohazards. CAJG 2018. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01665-4_61

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics