Skip to main content

From Tinkering Around the Edges to Reconceptualizing Courses: Literacy/English Teacher Educators’ Views and Use of Digital Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover International Research, Policy and Practice in Teacher Education

Abstract

This chapter reports on a study of 28 literacy/English teacher educators in 4 countries (Canada, the USA, Australia, and England) with a focus on their use of digital technology. For analyzing the data, we used Ottenbreit-Leftwich et al.’s (2010) six different ways to incorporate technology into teacher education: information delivery, hands-on skill-building activities, practice in the field, observations and modeling, authentic experiences, and reflections (p. 20). Although most felt using digital technology in teacher education is very important, there were huge differences in how they used it. A few reconceptualized their courses to teach about, with, and through it, while others only used it mainly for information delivery. Two major challenges identified by most were that their university only provided limited support and mostly for technical problems (not pedagogical support) and that student teachers were not necessarily discerning users of resources on the web.

We wish to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for their generous support of this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pseudonyms used for all participants

References

  • Barrett, M. D., & Mascia, E. G. (2012). Teacher response: Professional development to reconceptualize literacy instruction. In D. Alvermann & K. Hinchman (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives: Bridging the everyday/academic divide (pp. 264–269). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, S. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, S. (2011). Teaching 2.0: (re)learning to teach online. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 8(2), 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, S. (2016). Issues regarding digital technology in education. In C. Kosnik, S. White, C. Beck, B. Marshall, L. Goodwin, & J. Murray (Eds.), Building bridges: Rethinking literacy teacher education in a digital era (pp. 3–16). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adoption of technology for teaching and learning. Educause Quarterly, 25(2), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervetti, G., Damico, J., & Pearson, P. D. (2008). Multiple literacies, new literacies, and teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, F. (2005). La représentation par les enseignants, quant à leurs profils de compétences relatives à l’ordinateur: vers une théorie des TIC en éducation. La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage et de La Technologie, 31(1), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P. (2007). Literacy education in school. Research perspectives from the past, for the future. Camperbell: Australian Council for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Matin, J., Merchant, G., & Garcia-Sanchez, J. (2016). Preparing to teach 21st century literacies). In C. Kosnik, S. White, C. Beck, B. Marshall, L. Goodwin, & J. Murray (Eds.), Building bridges: Rethinking literacy teacher education in a digital era (pp. 43–55). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, C., & Dharamshi, P. (2016). In C. Kosnik, S. White, C. Beck, B. Marshall, L. Goodwin, & J. Murray (Eds.)., Building bridges: Rethinking literacy teacher education in a digital era Goals and practices of seven literacy teacher educators in four countries who have integrated digital technology into their literacy teacher education courses. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B. (2016). Multi modalities in literacy/English education courses). In C. Kosnik, S. White, C. Beck, B. Marshall, L. Goodwin, & J. Murray (Eds.), Building bridges: Rethinking literacy teacher education in a digital era. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero, V., Peressini, D., Meymaris, K., Ford, P., Garvin, T., Harlow, D., Reidel, M., Waite, B., & Mears, C. (2005). Integrating technology into teacher education: A critical framework for implementing reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(1), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2011). Digital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology and the new literacies (pp. 15–29). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, K. (2014). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selber, S. (2004). Multiliteracies in a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2011). In praise of pessimism – The need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2012). Ten suggestions for improving academic research in education and technology. Learning Media and Technology, 37(3), 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2013). Digital technologies in universities: Problems posing as solutions? Learning, Media and Technology, 38(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M., & Durant, C. (2013). Multiliteracies: A slow movement in literacy minor. In C. Kosnik, J. Rowsell, P. Williamson, R. Simon, & C. Beck (Eds.), Literacy teacher educators: Preparing student teachers for a changing world (pp. 175–190). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2011). Learning in the cloud: How (and why) to transform schools with digital media. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S., & Murray, J. (2016). Fostering professional learning partnerships in literacy teacher education. In C. Kosnik, S. White, C. Beck, B. Marshall, L. Goodwin, & J. Murray (Eds.), Building bridges: Rethinking literacy teacher education in a digital era (pp. 135–148). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare Kosnik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kosnik, C., Dharamshi, P., Menna, L. (2019). From Tinkering Around the Edges to Reconceptualizing Courses: Literacy/English Teacher Educators’ Views and Use of Digital Technology. In: Murray, J., Swennen, A., Kosnik, C. (eds) International Research, Policy and Practice in Teacher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01612-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01612-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01610-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01612-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics