Skip to main content

Revision Cartilage Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Joint Preservation of the Knee

Abstract

Due to its multifaceted nature and high rates for revision procedures, failed cartilage repair represents a challenging problem in patients. Prior to performing a revision procedure, it is essential to identify the non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors that accelerate the degradation of primary cartilage repair tissue. Comorbidities can include a patient’s activity status, malalignment, or instability. Since MRI findings may underestimate the true size of a cartilage lesion, data should also be collected from past operative reports and staging arthroscopies. This should be combined with a comprehensive physical exam to assess ligamentous integrity and proper limb alignment in order to optimize the intra-articular environment. When performing osteochondral allograft transplantation for large osteochondral defects, there are a number of important technical strategies and repair options to choose from in order to optimize graft incorporation. For patients who have failed a prior MST and show cystic or osteophytic changes on MRI, it is likely wise to favor OCA. However, in their absence the surgeon may proceed with either OCA or ACI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ, Warren RF, Potter HG, Spock CR, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Marx RG. The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1911–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Solheim E, Hegna J, Øyen J, Harlem T, Strand T. Results at 10 to 14 years after osteochondral autografting (mosaicplasty) in articular cartilage defects in the knee. Knee. 2013;20:287–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer MA, et al. Effectiveness of lavage techniques in removing immunogenic elements from osteochondral allografts. Cartilage. 2017;8(4):369–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stoker AM, et al. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate versus platelet rich plasma to enhance osseous integration potential for osteochondral allografts. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(4):314–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chahal J, Thiel GV, Hussey K, Cole BJ. Managing the patient with failed cartilage restoration. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2013;21:62–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomoll AH, Yoshioka H, Watanabe A, Dunn JC, Minas T. Preoperative measurement of cartilage defects by MRI underestimates lesion size. Cartilage. 2011;2:389–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook JL, Gomoll AH, Farr J. Commentary on “third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for knee cartilage injury: 2-year randomized trial”. J Orthop Res. 2016;34:557–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bentley G, Biant LC, Vijayan S, Macmull S, Skinner JA, Carrington RWJ. Minimum ten-year results of a prospective randomised study of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:504–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gudas R, Gudaitė A, Pocius A, Gudienė A, Čekanauskas E, Monastyreckiene E, Basevičius A. Ten-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint of athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pestka JM, Bode G, Salzmann G, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P. Clinical outcome of autologous chondrocyte implantation for failed microfracture treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:325–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaslav K, Cole B, Brewster R, DeBerardino T, Farr J, Fowler P, Nissen C. A prospective study of autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients with failed prior treatment for articular cartilage defect of the knee: results of the Study of the Treatment of Articular Repair (STAR) clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2008;37:42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Minas T, Gomoll AH, Rosenberger R, Royce RO, Bryant T. Increased failure rate of autologous chondrocyte implantation after previous treatment with marrow stimulation techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:902–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minas T, Ogura T, Headrick J, Bryant T. Autologous chondrocyte implantation “Sandwich” technique compared with autologous bone grafting for deep osteochondral lesions in the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2017;16:036354651773800.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gracitelli GC, Meric G, Pulido PA, McCauley JC, Bugbee WD. Osteochondral allograft transplantation for knee lesions after failure of cartilage repair surgery. Cartilage. 2014;6:98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gracitelli GC, Meric G, Briggs DT, Pulido PA, McCauley JC, Belloti JC, Bugbee WD. Fresh osteochondral allografts in the knee: comparison of primary transplantation versus transplantation after failure of previous subchondral marrow stimulation. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:885–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosa D, Di Donato S, Balato G, D'Addona A, Smeraglia F, Correra G, Di Vico G. How to manage a failed cartilage repair: a systematic literature review. Joints. 2017;05:093–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kon E, Mutini A, Arcangeli E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Nicoli Aldini N, Pressato D, Quarto R, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M. Novel nanostructured scaffold for osteochondral regeneration: pilot study in horses. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2010;4:300–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kon E, Robinson D, Verdonk P, Drobnic M. A novel aragonite-based scaffold for osteochondral regeneration: early experience on human implants and technical developments. Injury. 2016;47:S27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kon E, Filardo G, Shani J, Altschuler N, Levy A, Zaslav K, Eisman JE, Robinson D. Osteochondral regeneration with a novel aragonite-hyaluronate biphasic scaffold: up to 12-month follow-up study in a goat model. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Riff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riff, A.J., Gomoll, A.H. (2019). Revision Cartilage Treatment. In: Yanke, A., Cole, B. (eds) Joint Preservation of the Knee. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01491-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01491-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01490-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01491-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics