Abstract
In this paper, we describe a requirements engineering method with a focus on the conceptualization of alternative service offerings. The practical context for our project is based on the first author’s work in a startup. Our proposed method is suitable for exploring market opportunities while specifying a service offering. Our method helps requirements engineering practitioners understand the business and technology worlds by modeling business needs and technical capabilities in the same model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
References
Boman, M., Bubenko Jr., J.A., Johannesson, P., Wangler, B.: Conceptual Modelling. Prentice-Hall, Inc., London (1997)
Cleland-Huang, J., Damian, D.: Ready-set-transfer! Technology transfer in the requirements engineering domain. In: 2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 327–328. IEEE, August 2011
Daft, R.L., Weick, K.E.: Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9(2), 284–295 (1984)
Devine, S.W., Bugnion, E., Rosenblum, M.: Virtualization system including a virtual machine monitor for a computer with a segmented architecture, May 2002
Dos Santos, J.R.F., Albuquerque, A.B., Pinheiro, P.R.: Requirements prioritization in market-driven software: a survey based on large numbers of stakeholders and requirements. In: 2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), pp. 67–72. IEEE (2016)
Duarte, C.H.C., Gorschek, T.: Technology transfer-requirements engineering research to industrial practice an open (ended) debate (panel). In: 2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 414–415. IEEE (2015)
Gold, R.L.: Roles in sociological field observations. Soc. Forces 36(3), 217–223 (1958)
Gray, D.E.: Doing Research in the Real World. Sage, London (2013)
Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30(3), 611–642 (2006)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)
Maglio, P.P., Spohrer, J.: Fundamentals of service science. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(1), 18–20 (2008)
Maglio, P.P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen, J.T., Spohrer, J.: Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Commun. ACM 49(7), 81–85 (2006)
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook. Sage, Beverly Hills (1984)
Offermann, P., Blom, S., Schönherr, M., Bub, U.: Artifact types in information systems design science – a literature review. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_6
Popek, G.J., Goldberg, R.P.: Formal requirements for virtualizable third generation architectures. Commun. ACM 17(7), 412–421 (1974)
Regev, G., Wegmann, A.: Defining early it system requirements with regulation principles: the lightswitch approach. In: 2004 Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 144–153. IEEE (2004)
Regnell, B., Brinkkemper, S.: Market-driven requirements engineering for software products. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 287–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0_13
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68(1), 1–17 (2004)
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(1), 1–10 (2008)
Weber, R.: The reflexive researcher. MIS Q. 27(4), v–xiv (2003)
Wegmann, A.: On the systemic enterprise architecture methodology (SEAM). In: International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2003)
Wegmann, A., Julia, P., Regev, G., Perroud, O., Rychkova, I.: Early requirements and business-IT alignment with SEAM for business. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2007. pp. 111–114. IEEE (2007)
Zave, P., Jackson, M.: Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 6(1), 1–30 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pirelli, B., Wegmann, A. (2018). Technology-Transfer Requirements Engineering (TTRE) – on the Value of Conceptualizing Alternatives. In: Woo, C., Lu, J., Li, Z., Ling, T., Li, G., Lee, M. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11158. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01391-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01391-2_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01391-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)