Abstract
Rumor refers to unsubstantiated story or information being circulated. Although the more the integrity of the source implies the more the reliability of rumor, not all that seems reliable would be adjudged as valid. There has been cogent need for rumor validity assessment, but dearth of construct-relevant scale hampers empirical data collection. Considering that psychological scales are indispensable for assessment, the present study developed a suitable and psychometrically sound scale, using cross-sectional design and 570 randomly sampled participants. The psychometric properties are based on reliability and validity. Reliability (ά = 0.78) was determined by item-total statistics while validity was based on content validity indexes, principal component analysis and the compatibility of factor model to the data. Seven extracted factors accounted for 92% of the total scale variance. Rumor intensity score (R = 80) corroborated the scale suitability. However, although the newly developed 50-item Rumor Scale is suitable for adaptation among different populations at various settings, there is need for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) which was not implemented in the initial scale development study. Further validations, suggested to include cross-cultural and trans-national adaptations using CFA and other competing analysis models, can help to establish sufficient norms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. New York: Holt.
Cabrera-Nguyen, P.(2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(2), 99–103.
Coaley, K. (2010). An introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics. London, England: Sage.
Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2013). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Colton, D., & Covert, R. W. (2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. London: Wiley.
Cripps, B. (2017). Psychometric testing: Critical perspectives. USA: Wiley Blackwell.
DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development theory and applications: Applied social research methods series. Washington DC: Sage.
Gandi, J. C. (2018). Development and validation of health personnel perceived quality of life scale (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Nigeria: University of Ibadan.
Gandi, J. C., Ibadan, J., Musa, B., Gana, J. G., & Saleh, D. A. (2018, November). Perceived Impact of Rumor in Coexistence among Ethnically Diverse Community. Paper session presented at the Annual Scientific Conference of Nigerian Psychological Association: Lagos Nigeria.
Gandi, J. C., & Wai, P. S. (2010). Impact of partnership in coping in mental heal recovery: An experimental study at the Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital Kaduna. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 19(5), 322–330.
Gregory, R. J. (2000). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140.
Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 12, 245–265.
Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford England: Oxford University Press.
Matsumoto, D. (2009). The Cambridge dictionary of psychology. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Morgado, F. F. R., Meireles, J. F. F., Neves, C. M., Amaral, A. C. S., & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2017). Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia: Reflexao E Criyica, 30(3), 1–20.
Ojedokun, O. (2016). Development and psychometric evaluation of the littering prevention behavior scale. Ecopsychology, 8(2), 138–152.
Rao, C. R., & Sinharay, S. (2007). Handbook of statistics on psychometrics, Vol. 26.
Rivers, J. (2018). Cross-sectional study: Definition, advantages, disadvantages & example. Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/cross-sectional-study on September 22, 2018.
Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Inside rumor: A personal journal. American Psychologist, 46(5), 484.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education: Fifth Edition.
Willis, G. B. (2015). Analysis of the cognitive interview in questionnaire design. Oxford University Press.
Worthington, R., & Whittaker, T. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendation for best practices. Counselling Psychologists, 34, 806–838.
Zhu, X., & Liu, F. (2017). Research on behavior model of rumor based on systems dynamics. Hindawi Complexity, 2, 1–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gandi, J.C. (2019). Rumor Scale Development. In: Wiberg, M., Culpepper, S., Janssen, R., González, J., Molenaar, D. (eds) Quantitative Psychology. IMPS IMPS 2017 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01310-3_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01310-3_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01309-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01310-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)