Skip to main content

Data Collection on Support for Police Militarization Among a Sample of Police Officers, Police Executives, and Members of the U.S. Congress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Police Militarization

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSPOLICI))

  • 341 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the study on support for PM by key stakeholders of the practice, the results of which are presented in the remaining chapters of this book. Specifically, this chapter provides a detailed description of the data collection procedures, sampling technique, measures used in the study, and the research questions addressed. A discussion of Black’s theory of law is provided in order to develop theoretical predictions and a better understanding of the findings in this research. Additionally, this chapter addresses the first research question regarding the variation in support for PM in general, and in specific aspects of the practice across police officers, police executives, and members of the U.S. Congress. Results indicate that although there is general support for various aspects of PM across all stakeholders, the level of support can vary greatly for Congress versus law enforcement for specific aspects of PM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Placement of demographic questions at the beginning of surveys has been shown to increase response rate for these items and to not affect responses to future measures, as compared to when demographic questions were asked last (Teclaw et al. 2012; see also Babbie 2008; Colton and Covert 2007).

  2. 2.

    These professional law enforcement organizations were selected as they are among the largest and most nationally representative organizations in the United States. This allowed for a more diverse sample with varied perspectives to be included in the study. Only members that provided an e-mail address in the online membership rosters were contacted for participation. While the responses were anonymous, IP address locations indicated responses from California, Maine, Virginia, Florida, Texas, and many states in between had participated in the survey.

  3. 3.

    The 114th Congress comprised 246 Republicans (57%) and 187 Democrats (43%). In the present sample, there were 15 Republicans (60%) and 10 Democrats (40%) (Republican: z = −25.28, p = 0.768. Democrat: z = −18.94, p = 0.768). There were 88 women in the 114th Congress (20%), and in the present sample there were seven female Representatives (28%; z = −17.04, p = 0.335). Finally, 45 members of the 114th Congress were Black (10%), 38 were Hispanic (8%), and 351 (81%) were White. In the present sample, four (16%) of the Congress representatives were Black, 3 (12%) were Hispanic, and 18 (72%) were White (Black: z = −12.96, p = 0.338; Hispanic: z = −10.98, p = 0.479; White: z = −27.76, p = 0.270). These figures suggest the present sample closely resembles the 114th Congress in terms of gender, ethnicity and/or race, and political affiliation, as no statistically significant differences between the two groups were found.

References

  • Babbie, E. (2008). The basics of social research (4th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1993). The social structure of right and wrong. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (2007). Community policing in post-September 11 America: A comment on the concept of community-oriented counterterrorism. Police Practice and Research, 8(3), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colton, D., & Covert, R. W. (2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraska, P. (2007). Militarization and policing: Its relevance to 21st century police. Policing, 1(4), 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. E. (2011). Membership of the 111th Congress: A profile. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.senate.gov/CRSReports/crspublish.cfm?pid=%260BL%29PL%3B%3D%0A.

  • Reaves, B. (2015). Local police departments, 2013: Personnel, policies, and practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teclaw, R., Price, M. C., & Osatuke, K. (2012). Demographic question placement: Effect on item response rates and means of a veteran’s health administration survey. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(3), 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turner, F.W., Fox, B. (2018). Data Collection on Support for Police Militarization Among a Sample of Police Officers, Police Executives, and Members of the U.S. Congress. In: Police Militarization. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01282-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01282-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01281-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01282-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics