Skip to main content

Application of MILP to Strategic Sourcing of High-Cost Medical Devices and Supplies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1292 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11184))

Abstract

We discuss the application of a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to assist in the development of procurement strategies for high-cost medical devices and supplies in one of the largest nonprofit health-care organization in the USA. The MILP model seeks to reduce the costs of providing necessary supplies by qualifying the organization for price discounts through volume purchasing commitments, while maintaining diversity in the supply base, adhering to physicians’ preferences for specific products, and considering ratings given to suppliers on several dimensions on vendor scorecards. With results from multiple optimization scenarios, tradeoffs among procurement costs, requirements for diversity in the supply base, and flexibility of physicians in allowing substitute devices are explored in depth. Also revealed are potential consequences of stipulating formal vendor scorecard requirements when negotiating future contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, M.G., Katz, P.B.: Strategic sourcing. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 9(1), 1–13 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belliveau, J.: 3 Most Common Healthcare Supply Chain Management Challenges (2017). https://revcycleintelligence.com/news/3-most-common-healthcare-supply-chain-management-challenges. Accessed 11 May 2017

  • Bui, T., Yen, J., Hu, J., Sankaran, S.: A multi-attribute negotiation support system with market signaling for electronic markets. Group Decis. Negot. 10(7), 515–537 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, G.J., Carrillo, J.E., Vakharia, A.J.: Sourcing decisions with stochastic supplier reliability and stochastic demand. Prod. Oper. Manage. 18(4), 475–484 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, J., Liu, J.N., Ngai, E.W.: Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(10), 3872–3885 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiChiara, J. (2016), Why Executives are Demanding Supply Chain Management Value. Retrieved May 11, 2017, from http://revcycleintelligence.com/news/why-executives-are-demanding-supply-chain-management-value

  • Galankashi, M.R., Helmi, S.A., Hashemzahi, P.: Supplier selection in automobile industry: a mixed balanced scorecard–fuzzy AHP approach. Alexandria Eng. J. 55(1), 93–100 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, A., Ghomi, S.F., Jolai, F.: A multi-objective quantity discount and joint optimization model for coordination of a single-buyer multi-vendor supply chain. Comput. Math Appl. 72(8), 3251–3279 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., Diabat, A.: Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 47, 355–377 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(1), 71–79 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsak, E.E., Dursun, M.: An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 82, 82–93 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C.E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., Hoffman, B.J.: Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3), 435–455 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, A.C.: Allocation of order quantity among suppliers. J. Supply Chain Manage. 25(3), 36–39 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlar, M., Wang, D.: Diversification under yield randomness in inventory models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 77(1), 52–74 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolas, I., Woskie, L.R., Jha, A.K.: Health care spending in the United States and other high-income countries. JAMA 319(10), 1024–1039 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.A., Wilson, W.R.: Measuring customer satisfaction: fact and artifact. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 20(1), 61 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Douglas Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kulkarni, P., Smith, L.D. (2018). Application of MILP to Strategic Sourcing of High-Cost Medical Devices and Supplies. In: Cerulli, R., Raiconi, A., Voß, S. (eds) Computational Logistics. ICCL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00898-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00898-7_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00897-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00898-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics