Skip to main content

Pulmonary Ultrasound

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2944 Accesses

Abstract

Pulmonary ultrasound, as a diagnostic tool, is rapidly increasing in its adoption in acute care specialties. With relative ease, frontline clinicians can learn a few simple pulmonary sonographic signs, enabling them to narrow down the differential diagnosis of respiratory failure in a very expeditious manner. Accurate assessments of lung fluid overload, pneumothorax, lung consolidation, and pleural effusions are all readily performed using ultrasound with much greater sensitivity than chest X-rays. Mastering this technique, however, requires an understanding of the physical principles that are key to the development of pulmonary sonographic artifacts and ultrasound findings. A method of collecting, storing, and labeling images taken in each hemithorax is described in this chapter. In addition, state-of-the-art practical perioperative applications of pulmonary ultrasound are discussed. When used in conjunction with a clinical assessment, pulmonary ultrasound can be used for interval scanning of critically ill patients, eliminating or decreasing the need for serial chest X-rays or CT scans, and, more importantly, guiding informed patient management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shriki J. Ultrasound physics. Crit Care Clin. 2014;30(1):1–24. v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Enriquez JL, Wu TS. An introduction to ultrasound equipment and knobology. Crit Care Clin. 2014;30(1):25–45. v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ihnatsenka B, Boezaart AP. Ultrasound: basic understanding and learning the language. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2010;4(3):55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008;134(1):117–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lichtenstein DA. BLUE-protocol and FALLS-protocol: two applications of lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Chest. 2015;147(6):1659–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lichtenstein DA, Menu Y. A bedside ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax in the critically ill. Lung sliding. Chest. 1995;108(5):1345–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lichtenstein DA. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA, Lagoueyte J-F, Biderman P, Goldstein I, Gepner A. A-Lines and B-Lines. Chest. 2009;136(4):1014–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(4):577–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Soldati G, Inchingolo R, Smargiassi A, Sher S, Nenna R, Inchingolo CD, et al. Ex vivo lung sonography: morphologic-ultrasound relationship. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38(7):1169–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière G, Lascols N, Biderman P, Courret J-P, Gepner A, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of occult pneumothorax. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(6):1231–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayo PH, Doelken P. Pleural ultrasonography. Clin Chest Med. 2006;27(2):215–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lichtenstein D, Meziere G, Biderman P, Gepner A. The comet-tail artifact: an ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(4):383–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Volpicelli G. Sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(2):224–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtenstein D, Meziere G, Biderman P, Gepner A. The “lung point”: an ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(10):1434–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nandipati KC, Allamaneni S, Kakarla R, Wong A, Richards N, Satterfield J, et al. Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) in the diagnosis of pneumothorax: experience at a community based level I trauma center. Injury. Elsevier Ltd. 2011;42(5):511–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gentry Wilkerson R, Stone MB. Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Volpicelli G, Skurzak S, Boero E, Carpinteri G, Tengattini M, Stefanone V, et al. Lung ultrasound predicts well extravascular lung water but is of limited usefulness in the prediction of wedge pressure. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(2):320–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CWC, Kory PD, Arntfield RT. Development of a fluid resuscitation protocol using inferior vena cava and lung ultrasound. J Crit Care. 2016;31(1):96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peris A, Tutino L, Zagli G, Batacchi S, Cianchi G, Spina R, et al. The use of point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound significantly reduces the number of radiographs and computed tomography scans in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(3):687–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alzahrani SA, Al-Salamah MA, Al-Madani WH, Elbarbary MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ultrasound versus radiology in diagnosing of pneumonia. Crit Ultrasound J. 2017;9(1):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Monastesse A, Girard F, Massicotte N, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Girard M. Lung ultrasonography for the assessment of perioperative atelectasis: a pilot feasibility study. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(2):494–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tusman G, Acosta CM, Nicola M, Esperatti M, Bohm SH, Suarez-Sipmann F. Real-time images of tidal recruitment using lung ultrasound. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015;7(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tusman G, Acosta CM, Costantini M. Ultrasonography for the assessment of lung recruitment maneuvers. Crit Ultrasound J. 2016;8(1):8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P. Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmickl CN, Pannu S, MO A-Q, Alsara A, Kashyap R, Dhokarh R, et al. Decision support tool for differential diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) vs cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE): a prospective validation and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bouhemad B, Mongodi S, Via G, Rouquette I. Ultrasound for “lung monitoring” of ventilated patients. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(2):437–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Soni NJ, Franco R, Velez MI, Schnobrich D, Dancel R, Restrepo MI, et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of pleural effusions. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(12):811–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mayo PH, Beaulieu Y, Doelken P, Feller-Kopman D, Harrod C, Kaplan A, et al. American College of Chest Physicians/La Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest. 2009;135(4):1050–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Balik M, Plasil P, Waldauf P, Pazout J, Fric M, Otahal M, et al. Ultrasound estimation of volume of pleural fluid in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(2):318–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McLoud TC, Flower CD. Imaging the pleura: sonography, CT, and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(6):1145–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen KY, Liaw YS, Wang HC, Luh KT, Yang PC. Sonographic septation: a useful prognostic indicator of acute thoracic empyema. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19(12):837–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mian A, Chaudhry I, Huang R, Rizk E, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. Brachial plexus anesthesia: a review of the relevant anatomy, complications, and anatomical variations. Clin Anat. 2014;27(2):210–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Umbrello M, Formenti P. Ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragm function in critically ill subjects. Respir Care. 2016;61(4):542–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Haskins SC, Tsui BC, Nejim JA, Wu CL, Boublik J. Lung ultrasound for the regional anesthesiologist and acute pain specialist. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(3):289–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lichtenstein D, Meziere G. A lung ultrasound sign allowing bedside distinction between pulmonary edema and COPD: the comet-tail artifact. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24(12):1331–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cardinale L, Priola AM, Moretti F, Volpicelli G. Effectiveness of chest radiography, lung ultrasound and thoracic computed tomography in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure. World J Radiol. 2014;6(6):230–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Ludwig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Lung sliding and A-lines. Image obtained using a curvilinear probe, with rib shadows causing acoustic shadowing. Pleural line shows a slow back and forth movement with respiration (lung sliding). Underneath the pleural line, horizontal equidistant repetitious lines (A-line artifacts) are observed. The presence of both lung sliding and A-lines indicates the absence of pneumothorax and normal lung aeration at the point of probe placement (MOV 1760 kb)

Lung pulse and A-lines. Image obtained using a phased array probe. Pleural line showing a fast shimmering coinciding with cardiac activity (lung pulse). The presence of a lung pulse indicates the absence of a pneumothorax at the point of probe placement. Underneath the pleural line, a horizontal A-line artifact is observed (MP4 634 kb)

Absent lung sliding. Pleural line showing no lung sliding. This is suggestive of a pneumothorax but is not specific. Image obtained using a phased array transducer (MP4 221 kb)

Lung point. The transition point between sliding and absent lung sliding is demonstrated. This is very specific for pneumothorax (specificity 100%) (MP4 201 kb)

B-lines characteristics. B-lines extending from the pleural line to the end of the screen and moving synchronously with lung sliding. As seen in this video, three or more B-lines (or a coalescence of B-lines) are considered pathological (MP4 450 kb)

Consolidated (hepatized) lung with dynamic air bronchograms. Consolidated lungs could be secondary to pneumonia or atelectasis. Dynamic air bronchograms (seen in this video) are commonly seen with pneumonia, but are not necessarily specific (MP4 784 kb)

Pleural effusion (dynamic features). Pleural effusion characterized by being an anechoic space, within typical anatomical boundaries, with dynamic features. Diaphragmatic descent, as a dynamic feature, is demonstrated (MP4 585 kb)

Plankton sign. Floating debris, moving with cardiac activity and diaphragmatic movement within a pleural effusion, is named the “plankton sign.” Also note the different densities within the effusion fluid which also favors this being an exudative process (MP4 1279 kb)

B-line predominance in the right anterior chest wall. Multiple vertical hyperechoic comet tails on pulmonary ultrasound. This B-line predominance indicates abnormal lung aeration at the point of probe application (MP4 1069 kb)

B-line predominance in the right anterior axillary line. A coalescence of B-lines is demonstrated, indicating abnormal lung aeration at the point of probe application. Diffuse homogeneous B-line predominance is very characteristic of pulmonary edema (MP4 708 kb)

Case Presentation

Case Presentation

The postanesthesia care unit (PACU) nurse asks for your help. A 55-year-old lady underwent a left video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) talc pleurodesis for a chronic left pleural effusion, 2 h earlier, and has since been in the PACU with high oxygen requirements. The nurse mentions that all attempts at weaning her oxygen requirements to get her ready for ward transfer have been unsuccessful and she currently remains on an FiO2 of 0.6 by face mask. Her past medical history is significant for an ischemic cardiomyopathy with an estimated left ventricular ejection fraction of 35%. The anesthesiologists’ records document stable hemodynamics throughout the procedure, minimal blood loss, and a slight positive fluid balance of only 500 ml.

The patient appears to be fully awake and has good motor strength. Her BP is 105/60 mmHg, HR 82 beats/min, and her SpO2 92%. A portable chest X-ray, performed in PACU, was inconclusive (Fig. 28.12). A lung and pleural ultrasound is performed to further delineate the cause of her hypoxemia.

Fig. 28.12
figure 12

Plain portable chest X-ray of patient with undifferentiated hypoxia. Plain chest radiograph suggestive, but not conclusive, of pulmonary edema. As a modality, the sensitivity of plain chest X-rays in pulmonary edema detection is 50–68%

Case Resolution

Using a phased array transducer, her nonoperative right lung was scanned at two points: the anterior chest wall (Video 28.9) and the anterior axillary line (Video 28.10). Due to the surgical dressing covering large portions of her operative side, only her nonoperative side was scanned. Acquired images demonstrated a diffuse B-line pattern, consistent with an interstitial alveolar syndrome. With a working diagnosis of pulmonary edema, furosemide 40 mg was administered intravenously. Over the next 90 min, the patient diuresed 800 ml of urine, and her oxygen requirements were weaned to 3 L/min oxygen by nasal prongs. After meeting PACU discharge criteria, the patient was transferred safely to the ward.

The sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting pulmonary edema far surpasses that of plain chest X-rays (100% vs. 65%) [36, 37]. As a modality, ultrasound is quick and easy to use at the bedside and can be used either to make a diagnosis or, in this case, confirm a clinical suspicion. B-lines are defined as vertical hyperechoic comet tails that (a) emanate from the pleural line, (b) extend all the way to the end of the screen, (c) move with lung sliding, and (d) dominate over any other aeration patterns (i.e., dominate over A-lines). A clinically significant B-line pattern indicative of an interstitial syndrome is present when three or more B-lines or a coalescence of B-lines is visible on the same screen. The differential diagnosis for B-line predominance includes pulmonary edema, ARDS, early pneumonia, and subsegmental atelectasis. In this case, the relatively uniform B-line presence throughout the anterior and lateral chest was diagnostic of pulmonary edema.

This case highlights the value of ultrasound in dismissing diagnostic uncertainties. In general, the indications of perioperative ultrasound include assessing undifferentiated hypoxia, evaluating undifferentiated opacities on chest X-rays, and determining the safety of further fluid resuscitation. Point-of-care ultrasound empowers clinicians to make diagnoses at the bedside and may therefore expedite appropriate management and improve timely patient care.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ludwig, N., Hegazy, A.F. (2019). Pulmonary Ultrasound. In: Slinger, P. (eds) Principles and Practice of Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00859-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00859-8_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00858-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00859-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics