Skip to main content

Service Design During the Later Development Phases: Introducing a Service Design Roadmapping Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Service Design and Service Thinking in Healthcare and Hospital Management
  • 3508 Accesses

Abstract

User centricity and user involvement is increasingly emphasized in Norwegian legislations related to service development in the health and public sectors. The service design discipline has emerged as a relevant and popular alternative to accommodate the requirements of user involvement. At the same time, the service design discipline has been criticized for lacking implementation competence. So far, there has been a focus on the earlier phases of service development both in service design practice and academia, while the later phases have received less attention. This chapter focuses upon the later development phases, in other words implementation and the transition from testing and piloting to an operationalized service. In this transition, the focus lies on the handover from service design consultants to the client. The topic of service design handovers is explored through an interview study with Norwegian service designers and civil servants. The interviews point toward a key challenge related to handovers, namely, how the clients can be supported in their further work, after the service design consultants have left, more specifically, how clients can make use of the service design material during implementation. This chapter presents a promising direction for service design handovers, by introducing the concept of roadmapping for service design. By combining findings from the interviews and technology roadmapping (TRM) research, the chapter introduces an approach I call service design roadmapping. Lastly, issues that are important to consider when further exploring service design roadmapping are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlqvist, T., Valovirta, V., & Loikkanen, T. (2012). Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design. Science and Public Policy, 39(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, I. (2006). Removing the fuzziness from the fuzzy front-end of service innovations through customer interactions. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almqvist, F. (2017). The fuzzy front-end and the forgotten back-end: User involvement in later development phases. The Design Journal, 20(1), 2524–2533. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almqvist, F. (2018). Service design in the later project phases: Exploring the service design handover and introducing a service design roadmap. Paper presented at the 6th ServDes Conference: Service design proof of concept, Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arshed, N., Finch, J., & Bunduchi, R. (2012). Technology roadmapping and SMEs: A literature review. Paper presented at the DRUID 2012 Conference Copenhagen, 19–21 June 2012, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Bruce, M., & Cooper, R. (2000). Creative product design: A practical guide to requirements capture management. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, M. M., Fleury, A., & Lopes, A. P. (2013). An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1418–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clatworthy, S. (2013). Design support at the front end of the new service development (NSD) process. Dissertation, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design (Ed.), Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engström, J. (2014). Patient involvement and service innovation in healthcare. Dissertation, Linköping University (Ed.), Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M. L., & Bray, O. H. (1997). Fundamentals of technology roadmapping. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories (Ed.).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdsri, N., Kongthon, A., & Vatananan, R. S. (2013). Mapping the knowledge evolution and professional network in the field of technology roadmapping: A bibliometric analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.774350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2012). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916212X632934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helse-og omsorgsdepartementet. (2013). Morgendagens omsorg. Meld. St. 29 (2012–2013). Oslo: Helse-og omsorgsdepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helse-og omsorgsdepartementet. (2014). HelseOmsorg21. Et kunnskapssystem for bedre folkehelse: Nasjonal forsknings- og innovasjonsstrategi for helse og omsorg. Oslo: Helse-og omsorgsdepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M., Tapinos, E., & Knight, L. (2017). Scenario-driven roadmapping for technology foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C., & Phaal, R. (2015). Visualizing roadmaps: A design-driven approach. Research-Technology Management, 53(3), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5804253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2012). Cogitate, articulate, communicate: The psychosocial reality of technology roadmapping and roadmaps. R&D Management, 42(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. I. V., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. R. (2014). Depicting the future strategic plans of the Royal Australian Navy using a roadmapping framework as a visual composite canvas. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.843663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koen, P. A., Ajamian, G. M., Boyce, S., Clamen, A., Fisher, E., Fountoulakis, S., et al. (2002). Fuzzy front end: Effective methods, tools, and techniques. In P. Belliveau, A. Griffin, & S. Somermeyer (Eds.), The PDMA toolbook for new product development (pp. 5–35). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, R. (2016). Increasing the success of service design implementation: Bridging the gap between design and change management. Touchpoint, 8(2), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C., & Dearden, A. (2013). Beyond tokenistic participation: Using representational artefacts to enable meaningful public participation in health service design. Health Policy, 112(3), 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2014). Design in public and social innovation: What works and what could work better. Available via NESTA. Accessed January 3, 2018, from https://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/design-public-and-social-innovation

  • Overkamp, T., & Holmlid, S. (2017). Implementation during design: Developing understanding about service realisation before implementation. The Design Journal, 20(1), 4409–4421. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., & Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping: A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1–2), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., & Probert, D. R. (2009). Visualising strategy: A classification of graphical roadmap forms. International Journal of Technology Management, 47(4), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.024431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal, R., & Muller, G. (2009). An architectural framework for roadmapping: Towards visual strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringard, Ã…., Sagan, A., Sperre Saunes, I., & Lindahl, A. K. (2013). Norway: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 15(8), 1–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2013). Convivial toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segelström, F. (2010). Visualisations in service design. Dissertation, Linköping University (Ed.), Linköping, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segelström, F., & Holmlid, S. (2009). Visualizations as tools for research: Service designers on visualizations. Paper presented at the 3rd Nordic Design Research conference 2009, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design (Ed.), 30 Aug–1 Sept 2009, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonse, L. W. L., Hultink, E. J., & Buijs, J. A. (2014). Innovation roadmapping: Building concepts from practitioners’ insights. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 904–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickdorn, M., Hormess, M. E., Lawrence, A., & Schneider, J. (Eds.). (2018). This is service design doing. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (Eds.). (2011). This is service design thinking. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundby, I. J., & Hansen, L. U. (2017). Brukerne i sentrum: En kartlegging av statens fellesføring om brukerretting. Oslo: Difi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassi, R. (2009). Service design tools: Communication methods supporting design processes. Accessed December 3, 2015, from http://www.servicedesigntools.org/

  • Yu, E., & Sangiorgi, D. (2014). Service design as an approach to new service development: Reflections and future studies. Paper presented at the 4th ServDes conference, 9–11 April 2014, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frida Almqvist .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Almqvist, F. (2019). Service Design During the Later Development Phases: Introducing a Service Design Roadmapping Approach. In: Pfannstiel, M.A., Rasche, C. (eds) Service Design and Service Thinking in Healthcare and Hospital Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00749-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics