Skip to main content

Abstract

With the extensive use of biometric systems at most of the places for authentication, there are security and privacy issues concerning with it. Most of the public places we usually visit are under reconnaissance and may keep track of face, fingerprints, and iris etc. Thus, biometric information is not secret anymore and sensitive to spoofing attacks. Therefore, not only biometric traits but also liveness detection must be deployed in an authentication mechanism which is a challenging task. Iris is the most accurate trait and increasingly in demand in applications like national security, duplicate-free voter registration list, and Aadhar program its detection must be made robust. Solution to the iris liveness detection by extracting distinctive textural features from genuine (live) and fake (print) patterns using statistical approaches GLCM and GLRLM are implemented. Popular supervised SVM algorithm and PatternNet neural network with second-order scaled conjugate gradient training algorithm are assessed. Both of these algorithms are found to be faster with PatternNet outperforms over SVM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gragnaniello D, Poggi G, Verdoliva L (2015) An investigation of local descriptors for biometric spoofing detection. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 10(4):849–863

    Google Scholar 

  2. Unar JA, Seng WC, Abbasi A (2014) A review of biometric technology along with trends and prospects. Pattern Recognit 47(8):2673–2688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daugman John (1993) High confidence visual recognition of persons by a test of statistical independence. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15(11):1148–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daugman John (2004) How iris recognition works. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 14(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. He X, An S, Shi P Statistical texture analysis-based approach for fake iris detection using support vector machines. In: Proceedings of international conference on biometrics, pp 540–546

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee E, Park K, Kim J (2005) Fake iris detection by using purkinje image. In: Advances in biometrics, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer science. Springer, vol 3832, pp 397–403

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanematsu M, Takano H, Nakamura K (2007) Highly reliable liveness detection method for iris recognition. In: Annual conference SICE, pp 361–364

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jain AK, Bolle R, Pankanti S (1999) Personal identification in a networked society. Springer, New York, USA, pp 103–121

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galbally J, Ortiz-Lopez J, Fierrez J, Ortega-Garcia J (2012) Iris liveness detection based on quality related features. In: Proceedings of the 5th IAPR international conference on biometrics (ICB), pp 271–276

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mehrotra H et al (2012) Fast segmentation and adaptive SURF descriptor for iris recognition. Mathematical and computer modeling. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.06.034

  11. He Y et al (2012) Feature extraction of iris based on texture analysis. Advances in FCCS, vol 1, AISC 159. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 541–546

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Y et al (2015) Iris liveness detection using regional features. Pattern Recogn Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.10.010

  13. Sun Z, Tan T (2014) Iris Anti-spoofing. In: Marcel S et al (eds) Handbook of biometric anti-spoofing, advances in computer vision and pattern recognition. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6524-8_6

  14. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dijnstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification.IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics, November 1973

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huang X, Ti C, Hou Q-Z, Tokuta A, Yang R (2013) An experimental study of pupil constriction for liveness detection. In: Proceeding of IEEE workshop applications of computer vision (WACV), pp 252–258

    Google Scholar 

  16. He X, Lu Y, Shi P (2009) A new fake iris detection method. In: Proceeding 3rd international conference on advanced biometrics, pp 1132–1139

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pacut A, Czajka A (2006) Aliveness detection for iris biometrics. In: Proceedings of 40th annual IEEE international carnahan conference security technology, pp 122–129

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjusha N. Chavan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chavan, M.N., Patavardhan, P.P., Shinde, A.S. (2019). Scaled Conjugate Gradient Algorithm and SVM for Iris Liveness Detection. In: Pandian, D., Fernando, X., Baig, Z., Shi, F. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on ISMAC in Computational Vision and Bio-Engineering 2018 (ISMAC-CVB). ISMAC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00665-5_80

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00665-5_80

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00664-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00665-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics