Skip to main content

A Study on Comparative Analysis of Automated and Semiautomated Segmentation Techniques on Knee Osteoarthritis X-Ray Radiographs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on ISMAC in Computational Vision and Bio-Engineering 2018 (ISMAC-CVB) (ISMAC 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics ((LNCVB,volume 30))

  • 1699 Accesses

Abstract

Arthritis is a most common disease in the worldwide population targeting knee, neck, hand, hip, and almost all the joints of the human body. It is a frequently noticed problem in elder people, especially women. The severity of the disease is analyzed using the older KL grading system. Traditionally, the detection of various grades of OA (osteoarthritis) is interpreted by just a visual examination. A traditional modality, X-ray images are considered as the data for the project. The images are segmented using different segmentation techniques to extract the articular cartilage as region of interest. From the literature, eight different segmentation techniques were identified out of which seven are automated and one is semiautomated. By implementing those techniques and evaluating their performance, it is inferred that block-based segmentation, center rectangle segmentation, and the semiautomated seed point selection segmentation performs well and provides sensitivity, positive prediction value and dice Sorenson’s coefficient of 100%, respectively, and specificity of 0%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boniatis I, Costaridou L, Cavouras D, Kalatzis I, Panagiotopoulos E, Panayiotakis G (2006) Osteoarthritis severity of the hip by computer-aided grading of radiographic images. Med Biol Eng Compu 44(9):793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuang KS, Tzeng HL, Chen S, Wu J, Chen TJ (2006) Fuzzy C-Means clustering with spatial information for image segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph 30(1):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deokar DD, Patil CG (2015) Effective feature extraction based automatic knee osteoarthritis detection and classification using neural network. Int J Eng Techn 1(3)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dhanachandra N, Manglem K, Chanu YJ (2015) Image segmentation using K-Means clustering algorithm and subtractive clustering algorithm. Procedia Comput Sci 54(2015):764–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gan HS, Sayuti KA (2017) Comparison of improved semi-automated segmentation technique with manual segmentation: data from the osteoarthritis initiative

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gornale SS, Patravali PU Manza RR (2016) Detection of osteoarthritis using knee X-ray image analyses: a machine vision based approach. Int J Comput Appl 145(1)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hill PR, Canagarajah CN, Bull DR (2003) Image segmentation using a texture gradient based watershed transform. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(12):1618–1633

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubkaddi S, Ravikumar KM (2017) Early detection of knee osteoarthritis using SVM classifier. IJSEAT 5(3):259–262

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lankton S, Tannenbaum A (2008) Localizing region-based active contours. IEEE Trans Image Process 17(11):2029–2039

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu S, Wang S, Zhang Y (2017) A note on the marker-based watershed method for X-ray image segmentation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 141:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Minciullo L, Cootes T (2016) Fully automated shape analysis for detection of Osteoarthritis from lateral knee radiographs. In: 2016 23rd international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR). IEEE, pp 3787–3791

    Google Scholar 

  13. Navale DI, Hegadi RS, Mendgudli N (2015) Block based texture analysis approach for knee osteoarthritis identification using SVM. In: 2015 IEEE international WIE conference on electrical and computer engineering (WIECON-ECE). IEEE, pp 338–341

    Google Scholar 

  14. Øiestad BE, Juhl CB, Eitzen I, Thorlund JB (2015) Knee extensor muscle weakness is a risk factor for development of knee osteoarthritis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23(2):171–177

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rahman MA, Liu S, Lin S, Wong C, Jiang G, Kwok N (2015) Image contrast enhancement for brightness preservation based on dynamic stretching. Int J Image Process (IJIP) 9(4):241

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roopa H, Asha T (2016). Segmentation of X-ray image using city block distance measure. In: 2016 International conference on control, instrumentation, communication and computational technologies (ICCICCT). IEEE, pp 186–189

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ryzhkov MD (2015) Knee cartilage segmentation algorithms: a critical literature review. Master’s thesis

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scott D, Kowalczyk A (2007) Osteoarthritis of the knee. BMJ Clin Evid 2007:1121

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shamir L, Ling SM, Scott Jr, WW, Bos A, Orlov N, Macura TJ,… Goldberg IG (2009) Knee X-ray image analysis method for automated detection of Osteoarthritis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(2):407–415

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wahyuningrum RT, Anifah L, Purnama IKE, Purnomo MH (2016) A novel hybrid of S2DPCA and SVM for knee osteoarthritis classification. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and virtual environments for measurement systems and applications (CIVEMSA). IEEE, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The images used for this study were obtained from Manisundaram Medical Mission Hospitals, Vellore under the supervision of Dr. Manivannun K., M.S (Ortho.), Mr. Selva Prakash S., Dip. in X-ray Technology, and Ms. Suganya S B.Sc MSW, Counselor. We duly state that my data collection does not involve patient’s interference and invasive protocol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay Jeyakumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nagaraj, K., Jeyakumar, V. (2019). A Study on Comparative Analysis of Automated and Semiautomated Segmentation Techniques on Knee Osteoarthritis X-Ray Radiographs. In: Pandian, D., Fernando, X., Baig, Z., Shi, F. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on ISMAC in Computational Vision and Bio-Engineering 2018 (ISMAC-CVB). ISMAC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00665-5_153

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00665-5_153

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00664-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00665-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics