Skip to main content

Background of Modelling Approaches and Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Road Tunnels

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSPOLIMI))

  • 366 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the state of the art of the risk analysis methods and models for road tunnels with particular reference to the users’ egress models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Permanent International Association of Road Congresses was established on 27 April 1909 as a no-profit association following the first international congress on the road that was held in Paris in 1908, under the patronage of the French government. The association counts 142 member countries, and AIPCR has been present as a consultant in the economic and social committee of the United Nations Organisation (www.piarc.org/fr/) since 1970.

  2. 2.

    The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is an intergovernmental economic organisation with 35 member countries, founded in 1960 to stimulate economic progress and world trade (www.oecd.org).

References

  1. OECD (2001) Safety in tunnels—transport of dangerous goods through road tunnels. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD Publications, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saccomanno F, Haastrup P (2002) Influence of safety measures on the risks of transporting dangerous goods through road tunnels. Risk Anal 22:1059–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lacroix D, Cassini P, Hall R, Saccomanno F (1999) Transport of dangerous goods through road tunnels: an integrated QRA Model developed under the joint OECD/PIARC Project ERS2. International ESReDA Seminar on ‘Safety and Reliability in Transport’, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ruffin E, Cassini P, Knoflacher H (2005) Transport of hazardous goods (Chap. 17). Beard A, Carvel R (eds) The handbook of tunnel fire safety. Thomas Telford Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knoflacher H, Pfaffenbichler PC (2004) A comparative risk analysis for selected Austrian tunnels. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference tunnel safety and ventilation, Graz

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knoflacher H, Pfaffenbichler PC, Nussbaumer H (2002) Quantitative risk assessment of heavy goods vehicle transport through tunnels—the tauerntunnel case study. In: Proceedings of 1st international conference tunnel safety and ventilation, Graz

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knoflacher H, Pfaffenbichler P (2001) A quantitative risk assessment model for road transport of dangerous goods. In: Proceedings of the 80th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lovreglio R, Ronchi E, Nilsson D (2015) A model of the decision-making process during pre-evacuation. Fire Saf J 78:168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Derudi M, Borghetti F, Favrin S, Frassoldati A (2018) TRAM: a new quantitative methodology for tunnel risk analysis. Chem Eng Trans 67:811–816. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1867136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caliendo C, De Guglielmo ML (2016) Quantitative risk analysis based on the impact of traffic flow in a road tunnel. Int J Math Comput Simul 10:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caliendo C, Ciambelli P, De Guglielmo ML, Meo MG, Russo P (2012) Simulation of people evacuation in the event of a road tunnel fire. SIIV—5th Int Congr—Sustain Road Infrastruct Soc Behav Sci 53:178–188

    Google Scholar 

  12. Capote JA, Alvear D, Abreu O, Cuesta A, Alonso V (2012) A real-time stochastic evacuation model for road tunnels. Saf Sci 52:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ronchi E, Colonna P, Berloco N (2013) Reviewing Italian fire safety codes for the analysis of road tunnel evacuations: advantages and limitations of using evacuation models. Saf Sci 52:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ronchi E (2013) Testing the predictive capabilities of evacuation models for tunnel fire safety analysis. Saf Sci 59:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ronchi E, Alvear D, Berloco N, Capote J, Colonna P, Cuesta A (2010) Human behavior in road tunnel fires: comparison between egress models (FDS + Evac, Steps, Pathfinder). In: International conference on fire science and engineering Interflam, pp 837–848

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ronchi E, Colonna P, Capote J, Alvear D, Berloco N, Cuesta A (2012) The evaluation of different evacuation models for assessing road tunnel safety analysis. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 30:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lovreglio R, Fonzone A, Dell’Olio L (2016) A mixed logit model for predicting exit choice during building evacuations. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 92:59–75

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alonso V, Abreu O, Cuesta A, Alvear D (2014) An evacuation model for risk analysis in Spanish road tunnels. In: XVIII Congreso Panamericano de Ingeniería de Tránsito, Transporte y Logística (PANAM 2014), Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol 162, pp 208–217

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bosco D, Lovreglio R, Frassoldati A, Derudi M, Borghetti F (2018) Queue formation and evacuation modelling in road tunnels during fires. Chem Eng Trans 67:805–810. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1867135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Glasa J, Valasek L (2014) Study on applicability of FDS + Evac for evacuation modeling in case of road tunnel fire. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 7:3603–3615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seike M, Kawabata N, Hasegawa M (2017) Quantitative assessment method for road tunnel fire safety: development of an evacuation simulation method using CFD-derived smoke behavior. Saf Sci 94:116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Borghetti F, Derudi M, Gandini P, Frassoldati A, Tavelli S (2017) Evaluation of the consequences on the users safety. In: Tunnel fire testing and modeling: the Morgex North tunnel experiment. Springer International Publishing, pp. 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49517-0_5

  23. Lovreglio R, Ronchi R, Borri D (2014) The validation of evacuation simulation models through the analysis of behavioural uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 131:166–174

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Borghetti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borghetti, F., Cerean, P., Derudi, M., Frassoldati, A. (2019). Background of Modelling Approaches and Tools. In: Road Tunnels. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00569-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00569-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00568-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00569-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics