Skip to main content

Surveillance and Spatial Performativity in the Scenography of Tower

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1017 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will discuss Tower, a practice-research performance first staged in Elephant and Castle in 2017. Building upon the work of Dorita Hannah and her contention that scenography or performance design can critique architecture’s power structures (Theatr Perform Des 1:126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322551.2015.1032501, 2015), to argue that the scenography in Tower exploits the notion of surveillance to go beyond the city-as panopticon, intervening into the spatiality of the site to underscore other power dynamics inherent in its architecture. By utilising the window as a tool of surveillance, the scenography of Tower draws attention to the blurred boundaries between public and private space in the city and the performativity of public selves even in seemingly private spaces. In Tower, the act of watching reveals the power dynamics of a space in flux. This chapter will explore how Tower’s scenography intervenes into the built environment, utilising surveillance to make visible the (fictive) bodies of the (real) people displaced by the regeneration, and confronting the audience with their own power as a gentrifying presence in the site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aronson, A. (2017). Foreword. In J. McKinney & S. Palmer (Eds.), Scenography Expanded (pp. xiii–xxvi). London/New York: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brejzek, T. (2011). On the Authoring of Space. In T. Brejzek (Ed.), Expanding Scenography: On the Authoring of Space (pp. 8–15). Prague: The Arts and Theatre Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brejzek, T. (2017). Between Symbolic Representation and New Critical Realism: Architecture as Scenography and Scenography as Architecture. In J. McKinney & S. Palmer (Eds.), Scenography Expanded (pp. 63–78). London/New York: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, E., & Collins, J. (2017). Scenography Matters: Performing Romani Identities. In J. McKinney & S. Palmer (Eds.), Scenography Expanded (pp. 95–109). London/New York: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomina, B. (1996). Privacy and Publicity: Modern Architecture as Mass Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, S., & Mackay, A. (Eds.). (2017). Spaces of Surveillance: States and Selves. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Reprint, 1991. ed. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College De France 1977–1978. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropius, W. (1935). The New Architecture and the Bauhaus. Reprint, 1956. ed. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., Monahan, T., & Reeves, J. (2016). Editorial: Surveillance and Performance. Surveillance & Society, 14, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, D. (2011). Event-Space: Performance Space and Spatial Performativity. In J. Pitches & S. Popat (Eds.), Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction (pp. 54–62). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, D. (2015). Constructing Barricades and Creating Borderline Events. Theatre and Performance Design, 1, 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322551.2015.1032501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, S. (2016). Performing, Translating, Fashioning: Spectatorship in the Surveillant World. Surveillance & Society, 14, 168–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K. (2008). The Ambit of Performativity: How Site Makes Meaning in Site-Specific Performance. In D. Hannah & H. Olav (Eds.), Performance Design (pp. 39–55). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotker, S., & Gough, R. (2013). On Scenography: Editorial. Performance Research, 18, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2013.818306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgrath, J. (2004). Loving Big Brother: Surveillance Culture and Performance Space. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgrath, J. (2012). Performing Surveillance. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies (pp. 83–90). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, J. (2018). Seeing Scenography: Scopic Regimes and the Body of the Spectator. In A. Aronson (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Scenography. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, J., & Palmer, S. (2017). Introducing “Expanded” Scenography. In S. Palmer & J. McKinney (Eds.), Scenography Expanded: An Introduction to Contemporary Performance Design (pp. 1–20). London/New York: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuire, S. (2013). From Glass Architecture to Big Brother: Scenes from a Cultural History of Transparency. Cultural Studies Review, 9, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v9i1.3587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff, N. (2011). The Right to Look. Critical Inquiry, 37, 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. (2011). Surveillance as Cultural Practice. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. (2015). The Right to Hide? Anti-Surveillance Camouflage and the Aestheticization of Resistance. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 12, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2015.1006646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. (2015). Surveillance Society Needs Performance Theory and Arts Practice. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 11, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2015.1084812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. (2016). Discipline and Desire: Surveillance Technologies in Performance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ranciere, J. (2009). The Emancipated Spectator. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rufford, J. (2015). Theatre and Architecture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Southwark Council, Mayor of London. (2012). Elephant and Castle Supplementary Planning Document and Opportunity Area Planning Framework Available at: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-and-building-control/planning-policy-and-transport-policy/supplementary-planning-documents-spd/spd-by-area?chapter=6 (Accessed 1st April 2018).

  • Steiner, H., & Veel, K. (2011). Living Behind Glass Facades: Surveillance Culture and New Architecture. Surveillance & Society, 9, 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornett, L. (2018). Prosthetic Scenographies: Scenographic Extension of the Senses and Mediation of the Performance Space in Tower. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2018.1413225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and Disjunction, First MIT Press Paperback Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidler, A. (1992). The Architectural Uncanny. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Arx, S. (2016). Unfolding the Public Space: Performing Space or Ephemeral Section of Architecture, PQ 2015. Theatre and Performance Design, 2, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322551.2016.1183351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenstein, S.-O. (2012). Biopolitics and the Emergence of Modern Architecture. Reprint edition. New York/London: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, P. (2002 April 13). Profits Wrangle Proves to be Elephant’s Graveyard. Estates Gazette, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, N. (2003). Intensity of Scrutiny and a Good Eyeful: Architecture and Transparency. Journal of Architectural Education, 56, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1162/104648803321672915

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucy Thornett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thornett, L. (2019). Surveillance and Spatial Performativity in the Scenography of Tower. In: Flynn, S., Mackay, A. (eds) Surveillance, Architecture and Control. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00371-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics