Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the responses of leisure visitors who had chosen to visit a museum with natural history dioramas. Different ‘voices’ are heard from different visitors and during a visit constituent members influence what each other says because constructing meaning about the world is a social activity but their a reflection on the experience is individual as they leave. The visitor’s prior knowledge and the visitor’s interest in the exhibit, all have the potential to influence the visitor’s attitudes and responses to the exhibits. Some adults were asked questions at the diorama whilst other responses were from written responses on the questionnaire provided at the exit. The opinions of visitors to the dioramas were elicited through a questionnaire. They were asked to describe the ‘story’ of the diorama. There was a variation in responses depending on the age of the visitors. Young people’s responses were very factual and short whereas pensioners talked of memories such as working in one of the countries portrayed. Many visitors also related to what they had seen in the media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J. (2007). The historical context of science and education at the American museum on natural history. Culture Science Education, 2, 393–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. (2008). Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos. York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(1), 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Hilke, D., Kramer, R., Abrahams, C., & Dierking, L. (1997). Summative evaluation research: How thing fly- National Air and Space Museum. Unpublished evaluation report. Annapolis: Science Learning Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Lucas, K., & Ginns, L. (2003). Theoretical perspective on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, J. S. (2005). Museums as a mirror of society: A Darwinian look at the development of museums and collections of science. In P. Tirell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd conference of the International Committee for University Museums and Collections (pp. 57–65). Oklahoma: UMAC Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2010). Supporting student learning: A comparison of student discussion in museums and classrooms. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1991). Prototype interactive exhibits on rocks and minerals. Curator, 34(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2000). Moving toward innovation: Informal Science Education in University Natural History Museums. Curator, 43(2), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, Z. D., & Pekarik, A. J. (1996). Questioning the entrance narrative. Journal of Museum Education, 21(3), 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshach, H. (2006). Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. (2009). Identity and museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek: Left Coast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2009). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 8(5), 744–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors ‘agendas on museum learning. Curator, 41(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. (2009). Surrounded by science. Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1994). Fusing the boundaries between home and child care to support children’s scientific learning. Research in Science Education, 26, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (2010). The evolution of the science museum. Physics Today, 63(10), 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J., Watts, M., & Osborne, J. (1985). Eliciting student views using an interview- about- instances technique. In L. West & L. A. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure & conceptual change. Orlando: Academic Press Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1998). Learning science through practical experiences in museums. International Journal of Science Education, 2(6), 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the student in school groups. Science Education, 88(1), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S., & Kelly, L. (2010). Learning outside the classroom: A partnership with a difference. In Α. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education (pp. 179–191). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, G. (1998). Learning in the museum. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, T., & Atencio, D. (2007). Integration of play, learning and experience: What museum afford young people. Early Childhood Education, 35, 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Rosenfield, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2009). A cloud expedition at dioramas. In A. Scheersoi and S. D. Tunnicliffe (Eds.), The important role of natural history dioramas in biological learning (pp. 15–16). ICOM Natural History Committee Newsletter. No 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1994). Who goes to museums? In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The educational role of the museum (pp. 47–60). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2015, March 26). Personal interview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., & Fitzgerald, P. (2011). Cooperation, collaboration, challenge: How to work with the changing nature of educational audiences in museums. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive enquiry (pp. 77–88). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Langebek, R. (2011). L’ amenagement des collections d’ Histoire naturelle aux XVLL et XIX siecles. La Lettre d L’ OCIM, 134, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (2004). An emerging research framework for studying informal learning and schools. International Journal of Science Education, 88, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathewson, D. (2001). Museums and school: An analysis of the education ‘game’. Paper presented in the 18th Biennial Conference of the Australian Association, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, P. (1988). Good companions: More on the social determination of learning- related behavior in science museum. International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, 7, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miglietta, A., Belmonte, G., & Boero, F. (2008). A summative evaluation of science learning: A case study of the marine biology museum “Pietro Parenzan”. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mironer, L. (1996). Les musees d’histoire naturelle dans une typologie des musees. La Lettre de L’ OCIM, 55, 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monhardt, L., & Monhardt, R. (2006). Creating a context for the learning on science process skills through picture books. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34, 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moussouri, T. (1997). Family agendas and family learning in hands-on museums. Unpublished doctoral thesis. UK: University of Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, J. (2008). Beyond learning: Exploring visitors’ perceptions of the value and benefits of museum experience. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S., Yambor, K., & Packard, B. (1998). Hands- on biology: A museum school university partnership for enhancing students’ interest and learning in science. The Elementary School Journal, 98(3), 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, G. P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2013). Zoo talk. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piscitelli, B., & Anderson, D. (2001). Young children’s perspectives of museum settings and experiences. Museum Management and Curatorship, 19(3), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piscitelli, B., McAndle, F., & Weier, K. (2003). Beyond looks and learns: Investigating, implementing and evaluating interactive learning strategies for young children in museums. Final Report, QUT-Industry Research Project. Brisbane, Australia: Centre for applied studies in early childhood, Queensland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell-Cotton Museum. (2015a). Gallery 1. Retrieved from http://www.quexpark.co.uk/museum/museum-galleries/gallery-1.html. Last accessed 15 Dec 2017.

  • Powell-Cotton Museum. (2015b). Gallery 2. Retrieved from http://www.quexpark.co.uk/museum/museum-galleries/gallery-2.html. Last accessed 15 Dec 2017.

  • Powell-Cotton Museum. (2015c). Gallery 3. Retrieved from http://www.quexpark.co.uk/museum/museum-galleries/gallery-3.html. Last accessed 15 Dec 2017.

  • Powell-Cotton Museum. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.quexpark.co.uk/museum. Last accessed 29 May 2016.

  • Ramey-Gassert, L. (1997). Learning science beyond the classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rix, C., & McSorley, J. (2010). An investigation into the role that school- based interactive science centers may play in the education of primary- aged children. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, H. L. (2015). The caring museum: New models of engagement with ageing. Edinburgh: Museums Etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Scheersoi, A., Vogt, H., & Naumann, C. (2002). The development of situation interests in an informal learning environment- a visitor evaluation study in an educational exhibition on individuality. Proceedings from the IVth ERIDOB conference biology education for the real world, 22–26 October, Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. (2007). Teaching Science in Museums: The pedagogy goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91(2), 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1995). Talking about animals: studies of young children visiting zoos, a museum and a farm. Unpublished PhD thesis. London: King’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. (1999). Building a model of the environments: How do children see animals? Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Scheersoi, A. (2011). Natural history dioramas. Dusty relics or essential tools for learning. In A. Fillippoupoliti (Ed.), Science exhibitions: Communication and evaluation (pp. 186–217). Edinburgh: Museum Etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S. D., Lucas, A. M., & Osborne, J. F. (1997). School visits to zoos and museums: A missed educational opportunity? International Journal of Science Education, 19(9), 1039–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Director and staff and Susan Johnson of Quex Park for their help and enthusiasm in supporting this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eirini Gkouskou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gkouskou, E., Tunnicliffe, S.D. (2019). Leisure Visitor’s Responses to Natural History Dioramas. In: Scheersoi, A., Tunnicliffe, S. (eds) Natural History Dioramas – Traditional Exhibits for Current Educational Themes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00208-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00208-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00207-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00208-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics