Skip to main content
  • 287 Accesses

Abstract

The present study makes an attempt to provide an insight into the vast tribal knowledge, the great utility and relevance of this knowledge for all the entire mankind, and the way this knowledge has been acquired and possessed by the indigenous people of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Despite the undisputable significance of such knowledge and myriad benefits accruing from this acquisition, it is least likely that these indigenous methods can be put to use unless the possessors of this knowledge stay alive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With the adoption of an Act in 1874, the tribal areas were specified into “Scheduled Districts” to segregate the tribals to protect them. The areas were reconstituted at the time of the Government of India Act 1919. Subsection (i) of Section 92 of the Govt. of India Act 1935 is the next landmark providing for the administration of the “excluded areas” and the “partially excluded areas.”

  2. 2.

    A protected forest is defined as an “area notified under the provision of Indian Forest Act or State Forest Act having limited degree of protection. In Protected Forest all activities are permitted unless prohibited” (Forest Statistics 2002).

  3. 3.

    A reserve forest is defined as an “area notified under the provision of Indian Forest Act or State Forest Acts having full degree of protection. In reserved Forest all activities are prohibited” unless permitted (Forest Statistics 2002).

References

  • Awradi, S. A. (1990). Computerized master plan (1991–2021): For welfare of primitive tribes of Andaman & Nicobar Islands (pp. 26–27). Port Blair: Andaman and Nicobar Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • District Census Handbook Series-36. (2011). (Census 2011) (pp. 52–53). Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, K. (1989). The tribal policy of Jawaharlal Nehru. In K. K. S. Singh (Ed.), Jawaharlal Nehru, tribes and tribal policy (pp. 12–32). Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, T. N. (1998). Ecology, culture, history and world—view. The Andaman and Nicobar Islanders. Retrieved from http://ignca.nic.in.

  • Sekhsaria, P. (1999). Onge: A people in Peril. Frontline, 16(9), 26–30, April 24–May 07, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhsaria, P. (2003). Embracing disease (p. 20). Kalpvarksh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. J. (2003). In the sea of influence: A world system perspective of the Nicobar Islands (p. 105). Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arora, K. (2018). Conclusion. In: Indigenous Forest Management In the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00033-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics