Skip to main content

Designing and Testing an Open-Source Learning Management System for Small-Scale Users

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover E-Learning Networked Environments and Architectures

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

  • 757 Accesses

Abstract

The vision of reusable learning resources or objects, made accessible through coordinated repository architectures and metadata structures, has gained considerable attention within education and training communities. A proliferation of standards, architectures, Web technologies, and functionality abound to help realize this promise. This chapter outlines the issues associated with designing solutions for small-scale users such as small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It describes the requirements and architecture for the development of an open-source small-scale learning object (LO) management system that supports the full management of learning objects, by bringing together the most promising advances in this field to attain a learning system for use by small-scale users to leverage the power of learning objects for improved training at an individual and organisational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hokanson, B., Hooper, S. (2000) Computers as cognitive media: the potential of computers in educations. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16(5):537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IEEE. (2002) IEEE LOM Version 1, final draft. http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  3. IMS. (2001) http://www.imsproject.org.

    Google Scholar 

  4. WebCT. (1997) WebCT—e-learning solutions for higher education. http://www.webct.com.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blackboard. (1997) Blackboard Software Company, http://www.blackboard.com.

    Google Scholar 

  6. TopClass. (1995) TopClass Computer Systems, http://www.wbtsystems.com.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Docent Docent Software Company, http://www.docent.com.

    Google Scholar 

  8. TrainerSoft TrainerSoft Company, http://www.trainersoft.com.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fallon, C., Brown, S. (2003) e-Learning Standards: A Guide to Purchasing, Developing and Deploying Standards—Conformant e-Learning. Boca Raton, Florida: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Avaltus. (2000) http://www.avaltus.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brahler, C.J., Peterson, N.S., Johnson, E.C. (1999) Developing on-line learning materials for higher education: An overview of current issues. Educational Technology and Society, 2(2):42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duval, E., Hodgins, W. (2003) A LOM research agenda. In: WWW2003. Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rust, G., Bide, M. (2000) The “indecs” metadata framework: principles, model and data dictionary, http://www.indecs.org/pdf/framework.pdf. Indecs Framework Ltd in 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sciore, E., Siegel, M., Rosenthal, A. (1994) Using semantic values to facilitate interoperability among heterogeneous information systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 19(2):254–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Drew, P., et al. (1993) Report of the workshop on semantic heterogeneity and interoperation in multidatabase systems. ACM Sigmod Record, 22(3):47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. IEEE. (1999) Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. http://www.ieee.org/ portal/index.jsp?pageID=corp_levell&path=about/whatis&file=index.xml&xsl=generic.xsl.

    Google Scholar 

  17. AICC. (1988) http://www.aicc.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ARIADNE. (2001) European ARIADNE Project. http://www.ariadne-eu.org.

    Google Scholar 

  19. UCGIS. (1998) University Consortium for Geographic Information Science (UCGIS) Research Priority White Papers—Paper 5: Interoperability of Geographic Information. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/other/ucgis/research_priorities/paper5.html.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wiley, D.A. (2000) Learning object design and sequencing theory. In: Instructional Psychology and Technology Department. Provo City, UT: Brigham Young University, p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tannenbaum, A. (1991) Computer Networks, 2nd ed. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Padrick, N. (2003) Information you can use: A Data Mart Primer. Solutions Journal, 9(2):23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dushay, N. (2002) Localising experience of digital content via structural metadata. In: International Conference on Digital Libraries. Proceedings of the second ACM/IEEECS joint conference on Digital libraries, Portland, Oregan. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. LTSC. (2002) IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Mission. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/ltsc/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gibbons, A.S., Nelson, J., Richards, R. (2000) The nature and origin of instructional objects. In: The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version., Wiley, D.A., ed., Agency for Instructional Technology, available at http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/gibbsons.doc

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hodgins, W. (2000) Into the future. http://www.leamativity.com/download/MP7. PDF.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dahl, O.J., Nygaard, K. (1966) SIMULA—an algol based simulation language. Communications of the ACM, 9(9):671–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reigeluth, CM., Nelson, L.M.(1997) A new paradigm of ISD? Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 22:24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  29. LOM. (2002) IEEE LTSC WG12—Learning object metadata. http://ltsc.ieee.org/ wg 12/.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Newsroom. (1999) Internet growing too fast for search engines. http://www.editors-service.com/articlearchive/search99.html.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cisco. (2000) Reusable learning object strategy: definition, creation process, and guidelines for building, http://www.cisco.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hodgins, W. (2000) Everything you ever wanted to know about learning standards but were afraid to ask. http://www.linezine.eom/2.1/features/wheyewtkls.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wagner, E.D. (2002) The new frontier of learning object design. http://www. elearningguild.com.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wiley, D.A. (2000) Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.

    Google Scholar 

  35. ISO. (2002) Information technology: learning by IT. http://jtc1sc36.org/doc/ 36N0264.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Friesen, N., McGreal, R. (2002) International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.2/techl1.html.

    Google Scholar 

  37. IMS. (2001) IMS content packaging (CP). http://www.imsproject.org/content/ packaging/index.cfm.

    Google Scholar 

  38. UNFOLD. (2003) The UNFOLD Project. http://www.unfold-project.net/.

    Google Scholar 

  39. ADLNet. (2000) Advanced Distributed Learning Network (ADL Net) Advanced Distributed Learning, SCORM Past. http://www.adlnet.org/index.cfm?fuseaction= scormhist.

    Google Scholar 

  40. IMS. (2001) IMS simple sequencing (SS). http://www.imsproject.org/simplesequencing/index.cfm.

    Google Scholar 

  41. ADL. (2003) Advanced distributed learning network (ADL Net). ADL Co-Labs: overview. http://www.adlnet.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=colabovr.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ariadne. (2002) ARIADNE Foundation Presentation 1.1 http://www.ariadne-eu.org/ en/about/general/benefits/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  43. ISO. (2004) About ISO, introduction. http://www.iso.org/iso/en/aboutiso/introduction/ index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  44. IEC/CEI. (2004) International Electrotechnical Commission. http://www.iec.ch/.

    Google Scholar 

  45. ISO/IEC. (2004) International Organisation for Standardisation/ International Electrotechnical Commission JTC1 SC 36. http://jtclsc36.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  46. ALIC. (2001) Advanced Learning Infrastructure Consortium. http://www.alic.gr.jp/ eng/.

    Google Scholar 

  47. XMLSPY. (2000) http://www.xmlspy.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  48. DublinCore. (1998) Dublin Core metadata element set, version 1.1—reference description. http://dublincore.org/documents/1999/07/02/dces/.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ariadne. (1999) ARIADNE metadata recommendation version 3.0. http://ariadne. unil.ch/Metadata/ariadne_metadata_v3final1.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  50. CUBER. (1999) EU 5th Framework 1ST Programme, Personalised Curriculum Builder in the Federated Virtual University of the Europe of Regions, final version of metadata specification. http://www.cuber.net/web-v1/publications/cuber-d9-1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  51. GEMSTONES GESTALT, ACTS (Advanced Communications Technologies and Services) project, courseware metadata design V3 (GEMSTONES). http://www.fdgroup.com/gestalt/D0401_3.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Moodle Moodle Web site, http://moodle.org.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gruber, T.R. (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition, 5:199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L. (1999) Ontology developement 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. http://www.standford.edu/.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Poggi, A., Bergend, F. (2000) Multi-agent systems: ontology. In: ESAW Workshop at ECAI 2000, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Protege. (2000) Technical report: using Protégé-2000 to edit RDF. http://www.smi.Stanford.edu/projects/protege/protegerdf/protege-rdf.html.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bechhofer, S., et al. (2001) OilEd:a reasonable ontology eclitorfor the semantic Web. In: KI2001, Joint German/Austrian conference on artificial intelligence, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sure, Y., et al. (2002) OntoEdit: collaborative ontology development for the semantic Web. In: International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC02), Sardinia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., Rice, J. (1996) The Ontolingua server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction. In: 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Arpírez, J.C., et al. (2001) WebODE: a scalable ontological engineering workbench. In: First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), Victoria, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Duval, E., et al. (2002) Metadata principles and practicalities. http://dlib.org/dlib/ april02/weibel/04weibel.html.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Brennan, M., Funke, S., Anderson, C. (2001) Learning Content Management Systems: a new e-learning market segment emerges http://www.idc.com.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Concannon, F., Johnson. K. (2002) Learning through learning content management systems. In: Human Computer Interaction, HCI, Brighton, England.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Cross, J., Hamilton, I. (2002) The DNA of E-learning. http://www.austrainer.com/ elearning/dna-of-elearning.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kearns, D. (2004) Open Source all stars. http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/ nt/2004/0322ntl.html.

    Google Scholar 

  66. O’Droma, M., Ganchev, I., McDonnell, F. (2003) Architectural and functional desgin and evaluation of e-learning VUIS based on the proposed IEEE LT SA reference model. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(3):263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Cisco. (1999) Cisco Systems—reusable information object strategy. http://www.dsco. com/warp/public/779/ibs/solutions/learning/whitepapers/el_cisco_rio.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  68. MySQL. (1995) http://www.mysql.com.

    Google Scholar 

  69. SPAW. (2002) http://www.solmetra.com/spaw/.

    Google Scholar 

  70. dotLRN. (2001) http://dotlrn.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  71. IMS. (2001) IMS Global Consortium, Inc IMS Background. http://www.imsproject.org/ aboutims.cfm.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., et al. (1991) Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making Thinking Visible. American Educator: The American Federation of Teachers, 15(3):6–11, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, K., Hall, T. (2007). Designing and Testing an Open-Source Learning Management System for Small-Scale Users. In: Pierre, S. (eds) E-Learning Networked Environments and Architectures. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-758-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-758-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-351-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-758-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics