Abstract
Multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a useful tool for diagnosing and evaluating coronary artery disease, as well as elucidating mediastinal anatomy pertinent to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Multiple developments in hardware, software, and technique have contributed to improved spatial and temporal resolution while imaging the heart, giving high-quality information on native coronary arteries and bypass grafts. While CCTA is not routinely used as a sole test to proceeding with CABG, it provides more information on mediastinal anatomy than ICA and is indispensable for minimally invasive CABG and off-pump CABG and for evaluating potential arterial grafts for all-arterial bypass. In addition, CCTA has been shown to accurately assess coronary artery bypass grafts for stenosis and overall patency, in both venous and arterial grafts. CCTA is indispensable to reoperative surgery in determining the location of bypass grafts and other mediastinal structures in order to avoid damage during sternal reentry. The current status of multidetector CT (MDCT) for use with CABG is promising, and advances in newer-generation CT scanners may lead to it becoming the “gatekeeper” to the catheterization lab and the operating room.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Roach GW, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(25):1857–63.
Loop FD, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(1):1–6.
Zhang B, et al. Comparison of graft patency between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an updated meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(4):1335–41.
Locker C, et al. Multiple arterial grafts improve late survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of 8622 patients with multivessel disease. Circulation. 2012;126(9):1023–30.
Arad Y, et al. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Circulation. 1996;93(11):1951–3.
Godwin JD, et al. Clinical value of coronary bypass graft evaluation with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(4):649–55.
Daniel WG, et al. Value and limitations of computed tomography in assessing aortocoronary bypass graft patency. Circulation. 1983;67(5):983–7.
Tello R, et al. Spiral CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993;17(2):253–9.
Engelmann MG, et al. Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(5):569–74.
Becker CR, et al. Current development of cardiac imaging with multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol. 2000;36(2):97–103.
Flohr T, Schmidt B. Technical aspects of dual energy CT with dual source CT systems. In: Carrascosa PM, Cury RC, Garcia MJ, Leipseic JA, editors. Dual-energy CT in cardiovascular imaging. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 11–32.
Mangold S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using 3rd-generation dual-source CT and automated tube voltage selection: clinical application in a non-obese and obese patient population. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2298.
Treede H, et al. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in coronary surgery: first experiences with a new tool for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(4):S1398–402.
Plass A, et al. Sixteen-channel multidetector row computed tomography versus coronary angiography in a surgical view. Heart Surg Forum. 2006;9(2):E572–8.
Bedi HS, Gill JA, Bakshi SS. Can we perform coronary artery bypass grafting on the basis of computed tomographic angiography alone? A comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(4):633–8.
Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Rybicki FJ. The “post-64” era of coronary CT angiography: understanding new technology from physical principles. Radiol Clin N Am. 2009;47(1):79–90.
Sadigh G, et al. Impact of coronary CT angiography on surgical decision-making for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(9):1083–90.
Botman CJ, et al. Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(6):2093–7.
Shiono Y, et al. Impact of functional focal versus diffuse coronary artery disease on bypass graft patency. Int J Cardiol. 2016;222:16–21.
Curzen NP, et al. Does the routine availability of CT-derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone?: The FFRCT RIPCORD Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(10):1188–94.
Alexopoulos D, Moulias A. In the search of coronary calcium. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(2):310–7.
Kepka C, et al. Computed tomography to predict surgical revascularization of a left anterior descending artery occlusion incompletely visualized by conventional angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27(3):184–93.
Jones CM, et al. Multi-slice computed tomography in coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(3):443–50.
Hsiao EM, Rybicki FJ, Steigner M. CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12(1):68–75.
Bauer EP, et al. Internal mammary artery anomalies. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;38(5):312–5.
Prasad A, et al. Prevalence and treatment of proximal left subclavian artery stenosis in patients referred for coronary artery bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol. 2009;133(1):109–11.
Byrne C, et al. Ten-year experience in subclavian revascularisation. A parallel comparative observational study. Vascular. 2016;24(4):378–82.
Rigatelli G, Rigatelli G. Simultaneous preoperative brachiocephalic angiography and coronary angiography to prevent coronary-subclavian steal syndrome in coronary surgery candidates. Heart Surg Forum. 2005;8(3):E175–7.
Holzhey DM, Rastan AJ, Falk V, Mohr FW. Minimally invasive myocardial revascularization. In: Cohn LH, editor. Cardiac surgery in the adult. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2012. p. 553–66.
Gulbins H, et al. Preoperative 3D-reconstructions of ultrafast-CT images for the planning of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass operation (MIDCAB). Heart Surg Forum. 1998;1(2):111–5.
Schachner T, et al. Does preoperative multislice computed tomography predict operative times in total endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting? Heart Surg Forum. 2005;8(5):E314–8.
Wehman B, et al. Patient anatomy predicts operative time in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(4):572–6.
Stevens LM, et al. Conversion after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the CORONARY trial experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;51(3):539–46.
Benedetto U, et al. Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(1):59–65; discussion 65.
Yamaguchi A, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography as preoperative evaluation of a patent internal thoracic artery graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120(4):811–2.
von Smekal A. The potential of cardio-computed tomography. Multislice CT: a practical guide. Proceedings of the 5th International Somatom CT User Conference, Zurich, June 2000.
Nieman K, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet. 2001;357(9256):599–603.
Ropers D, et al. Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(7):792–5.
Lee JH, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27(5):657–67.
Stein PD, et al. Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(12):1669–73.
Anders K, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57(3):336–44.
Yamamoto M, et al. Noninvasive assessment of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery by 16-channel multidetector-row computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(3):820–7.
Houslay ES, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency using 16-slice computed tomography angiography. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;2:27.
Tochii M, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for diseased coronary artery graft detection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(6):1906–11.
Chan M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:898–905.
Ueyama K, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46(3):322–6.
Marano R, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(8):1353–62.
Romagnoli A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in evaluating coronary artery bypass grafts and of the native coronary arteries. Radiol Med. 2010;115(8):1167–78.
de Graaf FR, et al. Diagnostic performance of 320-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(11):2285–96.
Fitzgibbon GM, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(3):616–26.
Weintraub WS, et al. Frequency of repeat coronary bypass or coronary angioplasty after coronary artery bypass surgery using saphenous venous grafts. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73(2):103–12.
Zeff RH, et al. Internal mammary artery versus saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery: prospective randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45(5):533–6.
Achouh P, et al. Reappraisal of a 20-year experience with the radial artery as a conduit for coronary bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(1):87–92.
Javadzadegan H, Javadzadegan A, Mehdizadeh Baghbani J. Factors influencing mortality after bioprosthetic valve replacement; a midterm outcome. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2013;5(4):163–5.
Ghanta RK, et al. Evolving trends of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(2):364–72.
Kaneko T, et al. Contemporary outcomes of repeat aortic valve replacement: a benchmark for transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(4):1298–304; discussion 1304.
Ghoreishi M, et al. Repeat sternotomy: no longer a risk factor in mitral valve surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(4):1358–65.
Christenson JT, Schmuziger M, Simonet F. Reoperative coronary artery bypass procedures: risk factors for early mortality and late survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11(1):129–33.
Gasparovic H, et al. Three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in planning the surgical approach for redo cardiac surgery after coronary revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(2):244–9.
Imran Hamid U, et al. Incidence and outcome of re-entry injury in redo cardiac surgery: benefits of preoperative planning. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(5):819–23.
Kamdar AR, et al. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography in planning of reoperative cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(4):1239–45.
Aviram G, et al. Open heart reoperations after coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of preoperative imaging with multidetector computed tomography. Isr Med Assoc J. 2009;11(8):465–9.
den Harder AM, et al. Effect of computed tomography before cardiac surgery on surgical strategy, mortality and stroke. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(4):744–50.
Gada H, Desai MY, Marwick TH. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic angiography before reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: a decision-analytic model. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(5):705–10.
Oda S, et al. Cardiac CT for planning redo cardiac surgery: effect of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction on image quality. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(1):58–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Humana Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Felmly, L.M. (2019). Multidetector CT Angiography for Coronary Bypass Graft Assessment and Reoperative Cardiac Surgery. In: Schoepf, U. (eds) CT of the Heart. Contemporary Medical Imaging. Humana, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-237-7_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-237-7_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-236-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-237-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)