Abstract
In the early twentieth century, control of infectious diseases, increasing longevity, and poor lifestyles resulted in chronic diseases becoming the major cause of disability and death. By the 1920s, coronary artery disease (CAD) became the leading cause of death in the United States. As treatments emerged to treat CAD, it became important to develop means for identifying those patients at risk for developing the disease and its complications. Initial diagnostic work in this regard was initiated even prior to the advent of exercise electrocardiography. In the 1920s, Master developed his famous “two-step” stress test, which allowed physicians to assess patients’ functional capacity in a semiquantitative manner and to provoke angina symptoms through physical activity. In the 1950s, treadmill testing was implemented, and in 1963, Robert Bruce published his protocol for performing graded multistage treadmill exercise with electrocardiographic monitoring, a protocol that is still used today. This development of the Bruce protocol treadmill exercise was timely since the 1960s saw the introduction of cardiac catheterization and coronary bypass surgery. With this dramatic new treatment option, a need emerged to accurately identify those patients who were at risk for cardiac events and thus potential beneficiaries of coronary artery bypass surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dalen JE, et al. The epidemic of the 20(th) century: coronary heart disease. Am J Med. 2014;127(9):807–12.
Master AM. The two-step exercise electrocardiogram: a test for coronary insufficiency. Ann Intern Med. 1950;32(5):842–63.
Bruce RA, et al. Exercising testing in adult normal subjects and cardiac patients. Pediatrics. 1963;32:SUPPL 742–56.
Coplan NL. Evaluation of patients for coronary artery bypass surgery: the role of exercise testing. Am Heart J. 1991;122(6):1800–2.
Mark DB, et al. Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(6):793–800.
Zaret BL, et al. Noninvasive regional myocardial perfusion with radioactive potassium. Study of patients at rest, with exercise and during angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1973;288(16):809–12.
Berman DS, et al. Noninvasive detection of regional myocardial ischemia using rubidium-81 and the scintillation camera: comparison with stress electrocardiography in patients with arteriographically documented coronary stenosis. Circulation. 1975;52(4):619–26.
Wackers FJ, et al. Prognostic significance of normal quantitative planar thallium-201 stress scintigraphy in patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6(1):27–30.
Germano G, et al. Quantitative LVEF and qualitative regional function from gated thallium-201 perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1997;38(5):749–54.
Garcia EV, Maddahi J, Berman DS, Waxman A. Space-time quantitation of thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 1981;22(4):309–17.
Garcia EV, Van Train K, Maddahi J, Prigent F, Friedman J, Areeda J, Waxman A, Berman DS. Quantification of rotational thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med. 1985;26(1):17–26.
Ladenheim ML, et al. Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7(3):464–71.
Weiss AT, et al. Transient ischemic dilation of the left ventricle on stress thallium-201 scintigraphy: a marker of severe and extensive coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9(4):752–9.
Berman DS, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(5):1455–64.
Hachamovitch R, et al. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2900–7.
Rozanski A, et al. Comparison of long-term mortality risk following normal exercise vs adenosine myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17(6):999–1008.
Rozanski A, et al. Long-term mortality following normal exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT according to coronary disease risk factors. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21(2):341–50.
Supariwala A, et al. Influence of mode of stress and coronary risk factor burden upon long-term mortality following normal stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(6):846–50.
Hachamovitch R, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97(6):535–43.
Kang X, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am Heart J. 1999;138(6 Pt 1):1025–32.
Yao SS, et al. Practical applications in stress echocardiography: risk stratification and prognosis in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(6):1084–90.
Rumberger JA, et al. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation. 1995;92(8):2157–62.
Budoff MJ, et al. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(18):1860–70.
Detrano R, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(13):1336–45.
Polonsky TS, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction. JAMA. 2010;303(16):1610–6.
Nasir K, et al. Interplay of coronary artery calcification and traditional risk factors for the prediction of all-cause mortality in asymptomatic individuals. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(4):467–73.
Silverman MG, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium on coronary heart disease events in individuals at the extremes of traditional risk factor burden: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(33):2232–41.
Yeboah J, et al. Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals. JAMA. 2012;308(8):788–95.
Min JK, et al. Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(8):849–60.
Shaw LJ, et al. Why all the focus on cardiac imaging? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(7):789–94.
Rozanski A, Muhlestein JB, Berman DS. Primary prevention of CVD: the role of imaging trials. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(3):304–17.
Goldstein JA, et al. The CT-STAT (coronary computed tomographic angiography for systematic triage of acute chest pain patients to treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(14):1414–22.
Goldstein JA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(8):863–71.
Litt HI, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1393–403.
Douglas PS, et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1291–300.
Hoffmann U, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):299–308.
Levsky JM, Travin MI, Haramati LB. Coronary computed tomography angiography versus radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with chest pain admitted to telemetry: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(2):133–4.
Uretsky S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: the Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(4):1267–78.
Linde JJ, et al. Long-term clinical impact of coronary CT angiography in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain: the randomized controlled CATCH trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(12):1404–13.
Investigators, S.-H. CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9985):2383–91.
Hulten E, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(8):880–92.
Williams MC, et al. Use of coronary computed tomographic angiography to guide management of patients with coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(15):1759–68.
Cury RC, et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(3):310–5.
Min JK, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012;308(12):1237–45.
Norgaard BL, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1145–55.
Rocha-Filho JA, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology. 2010;254(2):410–9.
Murthy VL, et al. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2215–24.
Berman DS, et al. Phase II safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):469–77.
Baber U, et al. Prevalence, impact, and predictive value of detecting subclinical coronary and carotid atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults: the BioImage study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(11):1065–74.
Laclaustra M, et al. Femoral and carotid subclinical atherosclerosis association with risk factors and coronary calcium: the AWHS study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(11):1263–74.
Fernandez-Friera L, et al. Prevalence, vascular distribution, and multiterritorial extent of subclinical atherosclerosis in a middle-aged cohort: the PESA (progression of early subclinical atherosclerosis) study. Circulation. 2015;131(24):2104–13.
Berman DS, Arnson Y, Rozanski A. Coronary artery calcium scanning: the Agatston score and beyond. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(12):1417–9.
Rozanski A, Slomka P, Berman SD. Extending the use of coronary calcium scanning to clinical rather than just screening populations: ready for prime time. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(5):e004876.
Rozanski A, Cohen R, Uretsky S. The coronary calcium treadmill test: a new approach to the initial workup of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20(5):719–30.
Rozanski A, et al. Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(10):1054–65.
Berman DS, Germano G, Slomka PJ. Improvement in PET myocardial perfusion image quality and quantification with flurpiridaz F 18. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(Suppl 1):S38–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Humana Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uretsky, S., Rozanski, A., Berman, D. (2019). The Long March into Clinical Practice: Cardiac CT and Its Competitors. In: Schoepf, U. (eds) CT of the Heart. Contemporary Medical Imaging. Humana, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-237-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-237-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-236-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-237-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)